Longitudinal evidence on whether, and under what conditions, working from home is good or bad for family life is largely absent. Using 15 waves of data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, this study investigates the association between working from home and work–family conflict among parents. Fixed-effects structural equation models reveal that more hours worked at home are associated with less work–family conflict. This association, however, is only sizeable (and significant) for those working most of their hours at home. Furthermore, mothers benefit significantly more from home working than fathers. Additionally, mediation analysis suggests the association between working from home and work–family conflict is partly mediated by the level of schedule control, commuting time, and unsocial work hours. Whereas increased schedule control and less commuting among home workers reduce work–family conflict, home working is also associated with more unsocial work hours, which increases work–family conflict.
AbendrothA-KReimannM (2018) Telework and work–family conflict across workplaces: investigating the implications of work–family supportive and high-demand workplace cultures. In: BlairSLObradovićJ (eds) The Work–Family Interface: Spillover, Complications, and Challenges. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 323–348.
2.
AcockAC (2013) Discovering Structural Equation Modeling using Stata, Revised Edition. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
3.
AllenTDJohnsonRCKiburzKM, et al. (2013) Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology66(2): 345–376.
4.
AltintasESullivanO (2016) Fifty years of change updated: cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research35: 455–470.
5.
AmmonsSKMarkhamWT (2004) Working at home: experiences of skilled white collar workers. Sociological Spectrum24(2): 191–238.
6.
BakkerABten BrummelhuisLLPrinsJT (2011) Applying the job demands–resources model to the work–home interface: a study among medical residents and their partners. Journal of Vocational Behavior79(1): 170–180.
7.
BarreroJMBloomNDavisSJ (2021) Why Working from Home Will Stick (NBER Working Paper 28731). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BellmannLHüblerO (2021) Working from home, job satisfaction and work–life balance – robust or heterogeneous links?International Journal of Manpower42(3): 424–441.
9.
ByronK (2005) A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior67(2): 169–198.
10.
ChatterjeeKChngSClarkB, et al. (2020) Commuting and wellbeing: a critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research. Transport Reviews40(1): 5–34.
11.
CrosbieTMooreJ (2004) Work–life balance and working from home. Social Policy and Society3(3): 223–233.
12.
De VosDMeijersEvan HamM (2018) Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute. The Annals of Regional Science61(2): 375–398.
13.
DelanoeijeJVerbruggenMGermeysL (2019) Boundary role transitions: a day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Human Relations72(12): 1843–1868.
14.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerF (2001) The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 499–512.
15.
DockeryAMBawaS (2014) Is working from home good work or bad work? Evidence from Australian employees. Australian Journal of Labour Economics17(2): 163–190.
16.
EngWMooreSGrunbergL (2010) What influences work–family conflict? The function of work support and working from home. Current Psychology29(2): 104–120.
FelsteadAHensekeG (2017) Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment32(3): 195–212.
19.
GajendranRSHarrisonDA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology92(6): 1524–1541.
20.
GoldenTD (2012) Altering the effects of work and family conflict on exhaustion: telework during traditional and nontraditional work hours. Journal of Business and Psychology27(3): 255–269.
21.
GoldenTDVeigaJFSimsekZ (2006) Telecommuting’s differential impact on work–family conflict: is there no place like home?Journal of Applied Psychology91(6): 1340–1350.
22.
GoodeWJ (1960) A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review25(4): 483–496.
23.
GreenhausJHBeutellNJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review10(1): 76–88.
24.
HilbrechtMShawSMJohnsonLC (2008) ‘I’m home for the kids’: contradictory implications for work–life balance of teleworking mothers. Gender, Work & Organization15(5): 454–476.
25.
HilbrechtMShawSMJohnsonLC (2013) Remixing work, family and leisure: teleworkers’ experiences of everyday life. New Technology, Work and Employment28(2): 130–144.
26.
HillEJEricksonJJHolmesEK, et al. (2010) Workplace flexibility, work hours, and work–life conflict: finding an extra day or two. Journal of Family Psychology24(3): 349–358.
27.
HillEJHawkinsAJMillerBC (1996) Work and family in the virtual office: perceived influences of mobile telework. Family Relations45(3): 293–301.
28.
HookJL (2006) Care in context: men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review71(4): 639–660.
29.
HornungSGlaserJ (2009) Home-based telecommuting and quality of life: further evidence on an employee-oriented human resource practice. Psychological Reports104(2): 395–402.
30.
HoskingAWesternM (2008) The effects of non-standard employment on work–family conflict. Journal of Sociology44(1): 5–27.
31.
KelliherCAndersonD (2010) Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations63(1): 83–106.
32.
KimJ (2020) Workplace flexibility and parent–child interactions among working parents in the U.S. Social Indicators Research151(2): 427–469.
33.
KimJHenlyJRGoldenLM, et al. (2020) Workplace flexibility and worker well-being by gender. Journal of Marriage and Family82(3): 892–910.
34.
LaßIWoodenM (2020) Trends in the prevalence of non-standard employment in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations62(1): 3–32.
35.
LaßIWoodenM (2022) Weekend work and work–family conflict: evidence from Australian panel data. Journal of Marriage and Family84(1): 250–272.
36.
McQuaidRWChenT (2012) Commuting times – the role of gender, children and part-time work. Research in Transportation Economics34(1): 66–73.
37.
MadsenSR (2003) The effects of home-based teleworking on work–family conflict. Human Resource Development Quarterly14(1): 35–58.
38.
MannSHoldsworthL (2003) The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment18(3): 196–211.
39.
MarshallNLBarnettRC (1993) Work–family strains and gains among two-earner couples. Journal of Community Psychology21(1): 64–78.
40.
MeloPCDe AbreueSilvaJ (2017) Home telework and household commuting patterns in Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice103: 1–24.
41.
MichelJSKotrbaLMMitchelsonJ (2011) Antecedents of work–family conflict: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior32(5): 689–725.
OECD (2021) OECD Employment Outlook 2021: Navigating the COVID-19 Crisis and Recovery. Paris: OECD Publishing.
44.
PalumboR (2020) Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work–life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management33(6/7): 771–790.
45.
PearlinLI (1989) The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior30(3): 241–256.
46.
PetersPVan der LippeT (2007) The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 430–447.
47.
PetersPTijdensKGWetzelsC (2004) Employees’ opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption. Information & Management41(4): 469–482.
48.
PhillipsS (2020) Working through the pandemic: accelerating the transition to remote working. Business Information Review37(3): 129–134.
49.
PowellACraigL (2015) Gender differences in working at home and time use patterns: evidence from Australia. Work, Employment and Society29(4): 571–589.
50.
RaghuramSWiesenfeldB (2004) Work–nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management43(2–3): 259–277.
51.
SkoraTRügerHStawarzN (2020) Commuting and the motherhood wage gap: evidence from Germany. Sustainability12(14): 5692.
52.
StandenPDanielsKLamondD (1999) The home as a workplace: work–family interaction and psychological well-being in telework. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology4(4): 368–381.
53.
SteiberN (2009) Reported levels of time-based and strain-based conflict between work and family roles in Europe: a multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research93(3): 469–488.
54.
SullivanCSmithsonJ (2007) Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 448–461.
55.
SummerfieldMGarrardGHahnM, et al. (2020) HILDA User Manual – Release 19. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
56.
Van der LippeTLippényiZ (2020) Beyond formal access: organizational context, working from home, and work–family conflict of men and women in European workplaces. Social Indicators Research151(2): 383–402.
57.
VoydanoffP (2005a) Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and perceived stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology10(4): 491–503.
58.
VoydanoffP (2005b) Work demands and work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Family Issues26(6): 707–726.
59.
WilkinsRLaßIButterworthP (2019) The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey: Selected Findings from Waves 1 to 17. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
60.
WöhrmannAMEbnerC (2021) Understanding the bright side and the dark side of telework: an empirical analysis of working conditions and psychosomatic health complaints. New Technology, Work and Employment36(3): 348–370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
