Most prior research about employees’ work-family balance has examined relationships to organizational characteristics or individual characteristics, but ignored the larger national context in which these relationships occur. We developed a model suggesting that the degree of national gender equality is an important contextual variable that is positively related to organizational work-family supports (i.e. supportive work-family culture and flexible work arrangements), which are in turn related to individual managers’ balance of their work and family responsibilities. We tested the model using survey responses from 505 managers and professionals from 20 European countries and United Nations’ Gender Development Index scores of national gender equality for their countries, and found some support for the predicted relationships. These results highlight the importance of considering the larger context, and especially a nation’s standing in terms of its gender equality, for understanding work-family balance.
Acker, J.Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations . Gender and Society, 1990, 4, 139-158 .
2.
Baruch, Y.Response rate in academic studies - A comparative analysis . Human Relations, 1999, 52, 421-438 .
3.
Björnberg, U.Equality and backlash: Family, gender, and social policy in Sweden. In L. L. Haas , P. Hwang & G. Russell (Eds), Organizational change and gender equity: International perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2000, pp. 57-75.
4.
Brannen, J. & Lewis, S.Workplace programmes and policies in the United Kingdom. In L. L. Haas , P. Hwang & G. Russell (Eds), Organizational change and gender equity: International perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2000, pp. 99-115.
5.
Catalyst & Opportunity Now.Breaking the barriers: Women in senior management in the UK. London: Opportunity Now , 2000.
6.
Catalyst & The Conference Board . Women in leadership: A European business imperative. New York: Catalyst & The Conference Board , 2002.
7.
Council of the European Union . Council Resolution on the 1999 Employment Guidelines. Available [accessed 22 December 2002]: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/empl&esf/empl99/guide_en.htm
8.
Den Dulk, L.Organizational responses to work-family issues in Europe: A cross-national comparison . Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc., Toronto, Canada, 2002.
9.
Dreher, G. F.Breaking the glass ceiling: The effects of sex ratios and work-life programs on female leadership at the top . Human Relations,2003, 56, 541-562 .
10.
Emrich, C. G. , Denmark, F. L. & den Hartog, D. N.Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In R. J. House , P. J. Hanges , M. Javidan , P. W. Dorfman & V. Gupta (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2004, pp. 343-394.
11.
Esping-Andersen, G.Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press , 1999.
12.
Fahy, J.Improving response rates in cross-cultural mail surveys . Industrial Marketing Management,1998, 27, 459-467 .
13.
Galinsky, E.The family friendly employer: Examples from Europe. New York: Families and Work Institute , 1992.
14.
Galinsky, E. & Bond, T.The 1998 business work-life study: A sourcebook. New York: Families and Work Institute , 1998.
15.
Glezer, H. & Wolcott, I.Conflicting commitments: Working mothers and fathers in Australia. In L. L. Haas , P. Hwang & G. Russell (Eds), Organizational change and gender equity: International perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2000, pp. 43-56.
16.
Goetschy, J.The European employment strategy: Genesis and development . European Journal of Industrial Relations,1999, 5, 117-137 .
17.
Gutek, B. A. , Searle, S. & Klepa, L.Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict . Journal of Applied Psychology,1991, 76, 560-568 .
18.
Haas, L.Parental leave and gender equality: Lessons from the European Union . Review of Policy Research,2003, 20, 89-114 .
19.
Haas, L. L. & Hwang, P.Programs and policies promoting women’s economic equality and men’s sharing of child care in Sweden. In L. L. Haas , P. Hwang & G. Russell (Eds), Organizational change and gender equity: International perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2000, pp. 133-161.
20.
Haas, L. L. , Hwang, P. & Russell, G. (Eds). Organizational change and gender equity: International perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2000.
21.
Harzing, A. W.Cross-national industrial mail surveys: Why do response rates differ between countries?Industrial Marketing Management,2000, 29, 243-254 .
22.
Hill, E. J. , Hawkins, A. J. , Ferris, M. & Weitzman, M.Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance . Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies,2001, 50, 49-58 .
23.
Hofstede, G.Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, Vol. 5. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1980.
24.
Hofstede, G.Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1991.
25.
Hoyle, R. H. & Panter, A. T.Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1995, pp. 158-176.
26.
James, L. R. & Williams, L. J.The cross-level operator in regression, ANCOVA, and contextual analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 2000, pp. 382-424.
27.
Judiesch, M. K. & Lyness, K. S.Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers’ career success . Academy of Management Journal,1999, 42, 641-651 .
28.
Kline, R. B.Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press , 1998.
29.
Kropf, M. B.Flexibility initiatives: Current approaches and effective strategies . Women in Management Review,1999, 14, 177-185 .
30.
Kropf, M. B.Part-time work arrangements and the corporation: A dynamic interaction. In R. Hertz & N. L. Marshall (Eds), Working families: The transformation of the American home. Berkeley: University of California Press , 2001, pp. 152-167.
31.
Lewis, S. & Smithson, J.Sense of entitlement to support for the reconciliation of employment and family life . Human Relations,2001, 54, 1455-1481 .
32.
Linehan, M. & Walsh, J. S.Work-family conflict and the senior female international manager . British Journal of Management,2000, 11, S49-S58 .
33.
Lyness, K. S. & Thompson, D. E.Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives . Journal of Applied Psychology,1997, 82, 359-375 .
34.
Marks, S. R. & MacDermid, S. M.Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance . Journal of Marriage and the Family,1996, 58, 417-432 .
35.
Milliken, F. J. , Dutton, J. E. & Beyer, J. M.Understanding organizational adaptation to change: The case of work-family issues . Human Resource Planning,1990, 13, 91-107 .
36.
Milliken, F. J. , Martins, L. L. & Morgan, H.Explaining organizational responsiveness to work-family issues: The role of human resource executives as issue interpreters . Academy of Management Journal,1998, 41, 580-592 .
37.
Mitchell, O. S.Work and family benefits. In F. D. Blau & R. G. Ehrenberg (Eds), Gender and family issues in the workplace. New York: Russell Sage Foundation , 1997, pp. 269-276.
38.
Oliver, E. G. & Cravens, K. S.Cultural influences on managerial choice: An empirical study of employee benefit plans in the United States . Journal of International Business Studies,1999, 30, 745-762 .
39.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) . Balancing work and family life: Helping parents into paid employment . OECD Employment Outlook, 2001, June, 129-166 .
40.
Papalexandris, N. & Kramar, R.Flexible working patterns: Towards reconciliation of family and work . Employee Relations,1997, 19, 581-595 .
41.
Plantenga, J. & Hansen, J.Assessing equal opportunities in the European Union . International Labour Review,1999, 138, 351-379 .
42.
Pugh, S. D.Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter . Academy of Management Journal,2001, 44, 1018-1027 .
43.
Tausig, M. & Fenwick, R.Unbinding time: Alternate work schedules and work-life balance . Journal of Family and Economic Issues,2001, 22, 101-119 .
44.
Thompson, C. A. , Beauvais, L. L. & Lyness, K. S.When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1999, 54, 392-415 .
45.
United Nations Development Programme . Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. New York: Oxford University Press , 2001.
46.
Wharton, A. S. & Blair-Loy, M.The ‘overtime culture’ in a global corporation: A cross-national study of finance professionals’ interest in working part-time . Work and Occupations,2002, 29, 32-63 .
47.
Yuen, E. C. & Kee, H. T.Headquarters, host-culture and organizational influences on HRM policies and practices . Management International Review,1993, 33, 361-383 .
