Studies of care workers frequently reveal relatively high levels of job satisfaction despite poor employment conditions. The rewarding nature of care work, altruistic motivations and gendered social norms have all been used to explain why subjective job satisfaction is high despite poor pay and terms and conditions. Using data collected in case-study research with domiciliary and residential care workers, this article offers a new direction for care worker research that contextualizes the taken-for-granted assumption that care workers tolerate poor pay and conditions because women find the work satisfying and intrinsically rewarding. The article draws on cultural analyses of class to offer an alternative framework that identifies the wider social processes that can shape care workers’ job satisfaction.
AtkinsonCLucasR (2013) Worker responses to HR practice in adult social care in England. Human Resource Management Journal23(3): 296–312.
2.
AtkinsonW (2010) The myth of the reflexive worker: class and work histories in neo-liberal times. Work, Employment and Society24(3): 413–29.
3.
BoltonS (2005) Emotion Management in the Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
5.
BourdieuP (1988) Vive la Crise! For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society19(5): 773–88.
6.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BrownACharlwoodAFordeCSpencerD (2007) Job quality and the economics of New Labour: a critical appraisal using subjective survey data. Cambridge Journal of Economics31(9): 941–71.
8.
BrownACharlwoodASpencerD (2012) Not all that it might seem: why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor measure of job quality. Work, Employment and Society26(6): 1007–18.
9.
CorbySStanworthC (2009) A price worth paying? Women and work – choice, constraint or satisficing. Equal Opportunities International22(2): 162–78.
10.
DuffyM (2005) Reproducing labor inequalities: challenges for feminist conceptualizing care at the intersections of gender, race and class. Gender and Society19(1): 66–82.
11.
EborallC (2003) The State of the Social Care Workforce in England. Leeds: England Workforce Intelligence Unit, TOPSS England.
12.
EnglandPFolbreN (1999) Emotional labor in the service economy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science561(January): 39–51.
13.
EnglandPBudigMFolbreN (2002) Wages of virtue: the relative pay of care work. Social Problems49(4): 455–73.
14.
FolbreN (2012) Should women care less? Intrinsic motivation and gender inequality. Journal of Industrial Relations50(4): 597–619.
15.
HebsonG (2009) Renewing class analysis in studies of the workplace: a comparison of working-class and middle-class women’s aspirations and identities. Sociology43(1): 27–44.
16.
HimmelweitS (1999) Caring labour. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science561(1): 27–38.
KaineS (2012) Regulation and employee voice in the residential aged care sector. Human Resource Management Journal22(3): 316–31.
19.
Low Pay Commission (2013) National Minimum Wage: Low Pay Commission Report 2013. London: The Stationery Office.
20.
LyonD (2010) Intersections and boundaries of work and non-work. European Societies12(2): 163–85.
21.
McBrideAHebsonGHolgateJ (2014) Intersectionality – are we taking enough notice in the field of work and employment relations?Work, Employment and Society. Epub ahead of print 8September. DOI: 10.1177/0950017014538337.
22.
McClimontBGroveK (2004) Who Cares Now? An Updated Profile of the Independent Sector Home Care Workforce in England. Wallington: UKHCA.
23.
MittalVRosenJLeanaC (2009) A dual driver model of retention and turnover in the direct care workforce. Gerontologist49(5): 623–34.
24.
Office for National Statistics (2011) Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings: 2011 Provisional Results (SOC 2000). London: Office for National Statistics.
25.
PalmerPEvelineJ (2012) Sustaining low pay in aged care work. Gender, Work and Organization19(3): 254–75.
26.
RakovskiCPrice-GlynnK (2010) Caring labour, intersectionality and worker satisfaction. Sociology of Health and Illness32(3): 400–14.
27.
ReayD (2004) It’s all becoming a habitus: beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Sociology of Education25(4): 431–44.
28.
RoseM (2003) Good deal or bad deal? Job satisfaction in occupations. Work, Employment and Society17(3): 503–30.
29.
RuberyJUrwinP (2011) Bringing the employer back in: why social care needs a standard employment relationship. Human Resource Management Journal21(2): 122–37.
30.
RuberyJHebsonGGrimshawDCarrollMMarchingtonLSmithL. (2011) The Recruitment and Retention of a Care Workforce for Older People. London: Department of Health.
31.
SayerA (2011) Habitus, work and contributive justice. Sociology45(1): 7–21.
32.
SkeggsB (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: SAGE.
33.
Skills for Care (2007) National Survey of Care Workers: Report for Skills for Care. JN 142079. Available (consulted 5 November 2014) at: www.skillsforcare.org.uk/publications/
34.
StaceyCL (2005) Finding dignity in dirty work: the constraints and rewards of low-wage home care labour. Sociology of Health and Illness27(6): 831–54.
35.
WaltersS (2005) Making the best of a bad job? Female part-timers’ orientations and attitudes to work. Gender, Work and Organization12(3): 193–216.
