The Situational Occurrences Theory of Job Satisfaction

Abstract

A two-phase study was conducted to test the Situational Occurrences Theory of Job Satisfaction. The theory was designed to address the following anomalies: (1) why do employees holding seemingly excellent jobs in terms of the traditional job facets such as pay and benefits sometimes report low satisfaction, (2) why do employees holding similar jobs at the same or different organizations with similar pay, etc. have different job satisfaction levels, and (3) why do employee job satisfaction levels change over time when pay, etc. remains relatively stable? The theory posits that job satisfaction is a function of a relatively finite and stable set of variables called Situational Characteristics and a broader based, fluid set of variables called Situational Occurrences. It was hypothesized that overall job satisfaction could best be predicted from a combination of Situational Occurrences and Situational Characteristics than by either alone. It was also hypothesized that Situational Occurrences play a dominant role in determining subsequent satisfaction with the job. Both hypotheses were supported. In addition, male and female differences in the relative importance of Situational Characteristics and Situational Determinants were found.

Keywords

job satisfaction determinants of job satisfaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

FISHBEIN, M. , & AJZEN, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1975.

FURNHAM, A. , & SCHAEFFER, R. Pcrson-environment fit, job satisfaction and mental health. Journal of Occupational Psycliologu, 1984, 57, 295-307.

HACKMAN, J. R. , & OLDHAM, G. R. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.

HERZBERG, F. Work and ihe nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1966.

HODGSON, A. The civil service road to satisfaction. Personnel Management, 1985, 17, 54-57.

HOUSE, R. J. , & WIGDOR, L. A. Herzberg's dual-factor thcory of job satisfaction and motivation: A review of the evidence and a criticism. Personnel P.sycholog, 1967, 20(4), 369-389.

IVANCEVICH, J. M. , & MATTESON, M.T. Organization belhavlior lnd management. Piano, Texas: Business Publications, 1987.

KAVANAGH, M. J. , HURST, M. W. , & ROSE, R. The relationship between job satisfaction and psychiatric health symptoms for air traffic controllers. Personnel Psyclhology, 1981, 34, 691-707.

KHALEQUE, A. Job satisfaction, perceived effort and heart rate in light industrial work. Ergonomics, 1981, 24, 735-742.

10.

LOCKE, E. A. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psycholoD,0. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.

11.

MASLOW, A. H. A theory ofl human motivation. Psychological Revsiew, 1943, 50, 370-396.

12.

MILBURNE, G., Jr. , & FRANCIS, G. J. All about job satisfaciol. Suiperl'i.Soi) Mainagement, 1981, 26(8), 35-43.

13.

MIRVIS, P. H. , & LAWLER, E. E. Mcasuring the fiinacial impact ol cniployce attitudes. Journal of Applied P.s)'choloq.y, 1977, 62, 1-8.

14.

MITCHELL, T. R. , & LARSON, J. R. People in oiganizations: An ititroduction to organizational behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987.

15.

MOWDAY, R. T. Viewing turnover from the perspective to those who remain: The relationship of job attitudes to attribution of the causcs of turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 121-123.

16.

PORTER, L. W. , & STEERS, R. M. Organization, vork aind personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 8O, 151-176.

17.

SCARPELLO, V. , & CAMPBELL, J. P. Job satisfaction aind tlic fit between individual needs and organizational rewards. Journal of Occupational Psyclolok', 1983, 56, 315-328.

18.

SHIPLEY, P. A study of quality of life and work in a profcssional group. In R. G. Sell and P. Shipley (Eds.), Satisfactions in work deis,'i: Eionomics aid at/ier app/)roaclies. London: Taylor and Francis, 1979.

19.

VROOM, V. H. Work and motii'ationi. Ncw York: Wilcy, 1964.