This paper presents the systems-level changes that were adopted by a school in Mumbai, India, to implement Tier 2 reading interventions. We specifically report on three areas at the micro level of change: universal screening for proactive support, systematic intervention for strategic support, and team collaboration for coordinated support; and four areas at the macro level of change: capable leadership, team capacity, inclusive culture, and continuous improvement. The purpose of this paper is to provide practitioners in the Indian context insight into how to create a sustainable framework for implementing reading interventions at the Tier 2 level.
AnnamalaiE. (2004). Medium of power: the question of English education in India. In TollefsonJ. W.TsuiA. B. M. (Eds.), Medium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda? (pp. 177–1930). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
ASER Centre. (2018). Annual status of education report (rural).
6.
BarnettD. W.ElliottN.WolsingL.BungerC. E.HaskiH.McKissickC.Vander MeerC. D. (2006). Response to intervention for young children with extremely challenging behaviors: what it might look like. School Psychology Review, 35(4), 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2006.12087962
7.
BerkeleyS.ScanlonD.BaileyT. R.SuttonJ. C.SaccoD. M. (2020). A snapshot of RTI implementation a decade later: new picture, same story. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420915867
8.
Brown-ChidseyR.BickfordR. (2016). Multi-tiered Systems of Support. Building Academic and Behavioral Success in Schools. Guilford.
9.
CavendishW.HarryB.MendaA. M.EspinosaA.MahotiereM. (2016). Implementing response to intervention: challenges of diversity and system change in a high-stakes environment. Teachers College Record, 118(5), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800505
10.
ChoiJ. H.McCartA. B.SailorW. (2020). Achievement of students with IEPs and associated relationships with an inclusive RTI framework. The Journal of Special Education, 54(3), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919897408
11.
DixonP.SchagenI.SeedhouseP. (2011). The impact of an intervention on children’s reading and spelling ability in low-income schools in India. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(4), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.625125
12.
FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention: preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
13.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: what, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2017). Critique of the national evaluation of response to intervention: a case for simpler frameworks. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917693580
16.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28.
17.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: a decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203.
18.
GartlandD.StrosniderR. (2020). The use of response to intervention to inform special education eligibility decisions for students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720949964
19.
GerstenR.Newman-GoncharR.HaymondK. S.DiminoJ. (2017). What is the Evidence Base to Support Reading Interventions for Improving Student Outcomes in Grades 1-3?Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573686.pdf
GuptaR. (2014). Change in teaching practices: case of phonics instruction in India. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(1), 3911–3915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.865
22.
HarnB.ParisiD.StoolmillerM. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: what do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools?Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402913079002051
23.
HattieJ. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis.
24.
JosephL. M.KasteinL. A.KonradM.ChanP. E.PetersM. T.RessaV. A. (2014). Collecting and documenting evidence: methods for helping teachers improve instruction and promote academic success. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(2), 86–95. https://doi-org.libproxy.unm.edu/10.1177/10534512145360
25.
KaliaV. (2007). Assessing the role of book reading practices in Indian bilingual children’s English language and literacy development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0179-2
26.
KalyanpurM. (2008). Equality, quality and quantity: challenges in inclusive education policy and service provision in India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110601103162
27.
KurowskiM.ČernýM.TraplF. (2022). A review study of research articles on the barriers to inclusive education in primary schools. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 15(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2022.150206
National Education Policy. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education, Government of India.
35.
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
36.
NilviusC.CarlssonR.FälthL.NordströmT. (2021). Tier 2 interventions within the RTI-model for developing students’ word decoding – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1994105
37.
NishanimutS. P.JohnstonR. S.JoshiR. M.ThomasP. J.PadakannayaP. (2013). Effect of synthetic phonics instruction on literacy skills in an ESL setting. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 47–53.
38.
Poon-McBrayerK. F. (2018). Practicing response-to-intervention model: a case of leadership practices. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 14(1), 154–171. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1183588
39.
RamachandranV.PalM.JainS.ShekarS.SharmaJ. (2005). Teacher Motivation in India. Discussion Paper (pp. 96-103). Azim Premji Foundation.
RuffiniS. J.MiskellR.LindsayJ.McInerneyM.WaiteW. (2016). Measuring the Implementation Fidelity of the Response to Intervention Framework in Milwaukee Public Schools. REL 2017-192. Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570889.pdf
42.
SanettiL. M.CookB. G.CookL. (2021). Treatment fidelity: what it is and why it matters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12238
43.
ShenoyS.IyerA.ZahediS. (2022). Phonics-based instruction and improvement in foundational reading skills of kindergartners in the Indian schooling context. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01396-1
44.
ShepleyC.Grisham-BrownJ. (2019). Multi-tiered systems of support for preschool-aged children: a review and meta-analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.01.004
45.
ShepleyC.Grisham-BrownJ.LaneJ. D. (2022). Multitiered systems of support in preschool settings: a review and meta-analysis of single-case research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419899720
46.
SingalN. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in efforts towards inclusive education: reflections from India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7-8), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1624845
47.
SingalN.MuthukrishnaN. (2016). Reflexive re-storying of inclusive education: evidence from India and South Africa. In GrechS.SoldaticK. (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook (pp. 199–216). Springer Cham.
SrivastavaM.de BoerA.PijlS. J. (2015). Inclusive education in developing countries: a closer look at its implementation in the last 10 years. Educational Review, 67(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.847061
50.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and schoolwide positive behavior supports: integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903235375
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. D.BarthA.RomainM.FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087786
54.
VaughnS.FallA. M.RobertsG.WanzekJ.SwansonE.MartinezL. R. (2019). Class percentage of students with Reading difficulties on content knowledge and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775117
55.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390020401
56.
VijayanP.NaomiG. V. (2017). RTI and the Indian context: a case study. In NaomiG. V. (Ed.), Response to Intervention (RTI): In Indian Context, 1 (pp. 1–12). Xlibris US.
ZahediS.IyerA.JafferR.ShenoyS.ShourieR. (2022). A systems approach to improving foundational reading skills at a preschool in India. Education Sciences, 12(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120878
59.
ZahediS.ShenoyS.IyerA.VenkatP.ShourieR. (2025). Operationalizing inclusion: A case study on implementing RTI with fidelity at a school in India. [Manuscript under review].
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
