Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study compared the reading growth of students with and without learning disabilities, and students with and without reading deficits in response to tier 2 reading interventions within a response-to-intervention framework. Participants were 499 second- and third-grade students in six urban schools. Students who scored at or below the 10th percentile on the fall reading screening assessment were identified as having a severe reading deficit and received a tier 2 reading intervention that was targeted to their needs. Results showed a significant effect between groups on reading growth. Students with severe reading deficits receiving targeted tier 2 intervention grew at a rate that equaled the rate of growth of students without reading deficits and was significantly higher than students who were receiving special education services for reading. Implications for practice, suggestions for future research, and study limitations are discussed.

Keywords

response to intervention reading response to intervention (tier 2/tier 3)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AIMSweb. (2012). Technical manual. NCS Pearson. https://aimsweb.pearson.com/downloads/AIMSweb_TM.pdf

Baker

S. K.

Smolkowski

Katz

Fien

Seeley

J. R.

Kame’enui

E. J.

Beck

C. T.

(2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low-performing, high-poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18–37.

Balu

Zhu

Doolittle

Schiller

Jenkins

Gersten

(2015). Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading (NCEE 2016-4000). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Berkeley

Bender

W. N.

Peaster

L. G.

Saunders

(2009). Implementation of response to intervention a snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95.

Brown

R. S.

Coughlin

(2007). The predictive validity of selected benchmark assessments used in the Mid-Atlantic Region (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007—No. 017). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/midatlantic/pdf/REL_2007017_sum.pdf

Burns

M. K.

Appleton

J. J.

Stehouwer

J. D.

(2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.

Burns

M. K.

Maki

K. E.

Karich

A. C.

Hall

McComas

Helman

(2016). Problem analysis at tier 2: Using data to find the category of the problem. In Jimerson

S. R.

Burns

M. K.

VanDerHeyden

(Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (2nd ed., pp. 293–307). Springer.

Burns

M. K.

Ysseldyke

J. E.

(2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3–11.

Christ

T. J.

Silberglitt

Yeo

Cormier

(2010). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: An evaluation of growth rates and seasonal effects among students served in general and special education. School Psychology Review, 39, 447–462.

10.

Deno

S. L.

Fuchs

L. S.

Marston

Shin

(2001). Using curriculum-based measurements to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507–524.

11.

Ehri

L. C.

Dreyer

L. G.

Flugman

Gross

(2007). Reading rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language-minority students who are struggling readers in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 414–448.

12.

Elkonin

(1971). Development of speech. In Zaporozhets

A. V.

Elkonin

D. B.

(Eds.), The psychology of preschool children (pp. 111–185). MIT Press.

13.

Fountas

I. C.

Pinnell

G. S

. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Heinemann.

14.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2014). Rethinking service delivery for students with significant learning problems: Developing and implementing intensive instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 105–111.

15.

Fuchs

L. S.

Stecker

P. M.

(2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600304

16.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Hamlett

C. L.

Walz

Germann

(1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–27.

17.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Hosp

M. K.

Jenkins

J. R.

(2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.

18.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Schumacher

R. F.

Seethaler

P. M.

(2013). Instructional intervention for students with mathematical learning disabilities. In Swanson

H. L.

Harris

K. R.

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 388–405). Guilford Press.

19.

Gersten

Compton

Connor

C. M.

Dimino

Santoro

Linan-Thompson

Tilly

W. D.

(2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

20.

Hall

M. S.

Burns

M. K.

(2018). Meta-analysis of targeted small-group reading interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 54–66.

21.

Harn

B. A.

Stoolmiller

Chard

D. J.

(2008). Measuring the dimensions of alphabetic principle on the reading development of first graders: The role of automaticity and unitization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 143–157.

22.

Kavale

K. A.

Forness

S. R.

(2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In Gersten

Schiller

E. P.

Vaughn

(Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Synthesis of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281–326). Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

Kavale

K. A.

Fuchs

Scruggs

T. E.

(1994). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: Implications for policymaking. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 70–77.

24.

Lemons

C. J.

Kearns

D. M.

Davidson

K. A

. (2014). Data-based individualization in reading: Intensifying interventions for students with significant reading disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 20–29.

25.

Lovett

M. W.

Barron

R. W.

Frijters

J. C.

(2013). Word identification difficulties in children and adolescents with reading disabilities: Intervention research findings. In Swanson

H. L.

Harris

K. R.

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 329–360). Guilford Press.

26.

Maki

K. E.

Floyd

R. G.

Roberson

(2015). State learning disability eligibility criteria: A comprehensive review. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 457–469.

27.

Miciak

Fletcher

J. M.

Stuebing

K. K.

Vaughn

Tolar

T. D.

(2014). Patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses: Identification rates, agreement, and validity for learning disabilities identification. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 21–37.

28.

Morgan

P. L.

Frisco

M. L.

Farkas

Hibel

(2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 236–254.

29.

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2017). Digest of educational statistics. U.S. Department of Education.

30.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

31.

Nese

J. F.

Biancarosa

Cummings

Kennedy

Alonzo

Tindal

(2013). In search of average growth: Describing within-year oral reading fluency growth across grades 1–8. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 625–642.

32.

Northwest Evaluation Association. (2003). Technical manual for measures of academic progress (MAP) and measures of academic progress for primary grades (MPG). Author.

33.

Path to Reading Excellence in School Sites Research Group. (2014). PRESS intervention manual. Minnesota Center for Reading Research.

34.

Piasta

S. B.

Wagner

R. K.

(2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8–38.

35.

Rasinski

T. V.

(2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. Scholastic.

36.

Samuels

S. J.

(1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.

37.

Scammacca

N. K.

Roberts

Vaughn

Edmonds

Wexler

Reutebuch

C. K.

Torgesen

(2007). Intervention for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implication for practice. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

38.

Scammacca

N. K.

Roberts

Vaughn

Stuebing

K. K.

(2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 369–390.

39.

Shinn

M. R.

(Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. Guilford Press.

40.

Shinn

M. R.

Brown

(2016). Much ado about little: The dangers of disseminating the RTI outcome study without careful analysis. RTI Action Network, National Center for Learning Disabilities.

41.

SRA/McGraw Hill. (2008). Reading mastery. McGraw Hill.

42.

Stuebing

K. K.

Fletcher

J. M.

Branum-Martin

Francis

D. J.

(2012). Evaluation of the technical adequacy of three methods for identifying specific learning disabilities based on cognitive discrepancies. School Psychology Review, 41, 3–22.

43.

Torgesen

J. K.

(2009). The response to intervention instructional model: Some outcomes from a large-scale implementation in reading first schools. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 38–40.

44.

Treptow

M. A.

Burns

M. K.

McComas

J. J.

(2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on students’ reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review, 36, 159–166.

45.

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). Reading assessment. U.S. Department of Education.

46.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2006). IDEA regulations: Individualized Education Program (IEP).

47.

Vaughn

Mathes

Linan-Thompson

Cirino

Carlson

Pollard-Durodola

. . . Francis

(2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elementary School Journal, 107, 153–180.

48.

Vaughn

Wanzek

(2014). Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful impacts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 46–53.

49.

Vaughn

Wanzek

Wexler

Barth

Cirino

Fletcher

. . . Francis

(2010). The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 23, 931–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9183-9

50.

Wanzek

Vaughn

Scammacca

Gatlin

Walker

M. A.

Capin

. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 551–576.

51.

Yeo

(2011). Reliability generalization of curriculum-based measurement reading aloud: A meta-analytic review. Exceptionality, 19, 75–93.

Comparison of Reading Growth Among Students With Severe Reading Deficits Who Received Intervention to Typically Achieving Students and Students Receiving Special Education

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References