The effect of the impactor nose shape on the penetration behavior of
polymethacrylimide foams is investigated in the velocity range of 4—8 m/s. It
is observed from experimental results that penetration load depends on the geometry
of the impactor and the density of the foam. An analytical model is developed to
predict the penetration behavior of polymeric foams; good agreement between
analytical predictions and experimental data is obtained.
Abrate S.Impact on composite structures. New
York: Cambridge University Press,
1998.
2.
Evonik Röhm GmbH.Data CD `ROHACELL ® - The Core for Sandwich Solutions'.
Darmstadt, Germany: EVONIK Röhm
GmbH, 2008.
3.
Li QM, Magkiriadis I. and Harrigan JJCompressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular
solids . J Cell Plast2006; 42:
371-392.
4.
Li QM, Mines RAW and Birch RSThe crush behaviour of Rohacell-51WF structural foam.
Int J Solids Struct2000; 37:
6321-6341.
5.
Li QM and Mines RAW.Strain measures for rigid crushable foam in uniaxial
compression. Strain2002; 38:
132-140.
6.
Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM and Mines RAW.Degradation of elastic modulus of progressively crushable foams in
uniaxial compression . J Cell Plast2008; 44:
415-434.
7.
Sun CT and Wu CLLow velocity impact of composite sandwich panels. In:
Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural
Dynamics and Materials Conference, Baltimore,
1991.
8.
Rizov V., Shipsha A. and Zenkert D.Indentation study of foam core sandwich composite
panels. Compos Struct2005; 69:
95-102.
9.
Chen CP, Anderson WB and Lakes RSRelating the properties of foam to the properties of the solid from
which it is made. Cell Polym1994; 13:
16-32.
10.
Chen CP and Lakes RSAnalysis of the structure-property relations of foam
materials. Cell Polym1995; 14:
186-202.
11.
Hanssen AG, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M. and Ilstad H.Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium
foams. Int J Mech Sci2002; 44:
359-406.
12.
Harrigan JJ , Reid SR and Reddy TYInertial effects on the crushing strength of wood loaded along the
grain. In: Experimental Mechanics: Advances in Design,
Testing and Analysis: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on
Experimental Mechanics. Oxford : A.A. Balkema ,
1998.
13.
Maji AK, Schreyer HL, Donald S., Zuo Q. and Satpathi D.Mechanical properties of polyurethane-foam impact
limiters. J Eng Mech1995; 121:
528-540.
Zhang J., Kikuchi N., Li V., Yee A. and Nusholtz G.Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic
crash loading. Int J Impact Eng1998; 21:
369-386.
16.
Rizov VILow velocity localized impact study of cellular foams.
Mater Des2007; 28:
2632-2640.
17.
Wen HM, Reddy TY, Reid SR and Soden PDIndentation, penetration and perforation of composite laminate and
sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading.
Key Eng Mater1998; 141-143:
501-552.
18.
Shitta-Bey OT , Carruthers JJ, Soutis C. and Found MSThe localized low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycombs and
sandwich panels for occupant head protection: experimental characterization and
analytical modelling . Int J Crashworth2007; 12:
549-558.
19.
Mills NJ and Moosa ASI.Impacts of hemispherical strikers on polystyrene bead
foam. J Cell Plast1999; 35:
289-310.
20.
Flores-Johnson EA and Li QMIndentation into polymeric foams . Int J
Solids Struct2010; 47:
1987-1995.
21.
Li QM, Mines RAW and Birch RSStatic and dynamic behaviour of composite riveted joints in
tension . Int J Mech Sci2001; 43:
1591-1610.
22.
Lifshitz JM , Gov F. and Gandelsman M.Instrumented low-velocity impact of CFRP beams .
Int J Impact Eng1995; 16:
201-215.
23.
Hernández W.Improving the response of an accelerometer by using optimal
filtering. Sens Actuators A Phys2001; 88:
198-208.
24.
Song B., Chen W., Yanagita T. and Frew DJConfinement effects on the dynamic compressive properties of an epoxy
syntactic foam. Compos Struct2005; 67:
279-287.
25.
Olurin OB, Fleck NA and Ashby MFIndentation resistance of an aluminium foam.
Script Mater2000; 43:
983-989.
