This study investigated how Finnish, Taiwanese, and U.S. children (N = 66; 6-8 years) conceptualized and experienced care. Thematic analysis revealed that children across cultures associate care with (1) helping others and (2) being together. Culture impacted whether care involved helping the vulnerable, being kind, nice, and helpful, being able to call for help, accompanying others, playing with and letting one play, and respecting personal space. The findings suggest that children actively reflect on family care and highlight the importance of culture in expanding definitions of what it means to care.
AarnioKRotkirchA (2022) Parental relationships and family functioning of Finnish children living with LGBTQ+ parents. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research30(4): 249–263.
2.
AlcaláLCervera MontejanoMDFernandezYS (2021) How Yucatec Maya children learn to help at home. Human Development65(4): 191–203.
3.
AllenLRKellyBB (2015) Transforming the Workforce for Children Birth through Age 8: A Unifying Foundation. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK310545
4.
Bakermans-KranenburgMJVan IjzendoornMH (2021) Dimensions, determinants, and development of prosocial behaviour: a differential susceptibility hypothesis on attachment and moral character. In: HardcourtE (ed) Attachment and Character. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44–70.
5.
BoyatzisR (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2022) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.
8.
BrittoPRLyeSJProulxK, et al. (2017) Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. The Lancet389(10064): 91–102.
9.
BrownellCA and Early Social Development Research Lab (2016) Prosocial behavior in infancy: the role of socialization. Child Development Perspectives10(4): 222–227.
10.
ChuangSSGlozmanJGreenDS, et al. (2018) Parenting and family relationships in Chinese families: a critical ecological approach. Journal of Family Theory and Review10(2): 367–383.
11.
ChungWYYeungWJJDrobničS (2021) Family policies and care regimes in Asia. International Journal of Social Welfare30(4): 371–384.
12.
CoppensADRogoffB (2022) Cultural variation in the early development of initiative in children's prosocial helping. Social Development31(3): 656–678.
13.
CoppensADAlcaláLRogoffB, et al. (2016) Children’s contributions in family work: two cultural paradigms. In: SkeltonTPunchSVanderbeckR (eds) Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations. Singapore: Springer, 187–213.
14.
CruzAMLaibleDCarloG (2024) The moderating role of gender and acculturative status in the socialization of cultural values in US Mexican families. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, Epub ahead of print 4 April 2024. DOI: 10.1037/cdp0000661.
15.
CuiMJanhonen-AbruquahHDarlingCA, et al. (2019) Helicopter parenting and young adults’ well-being: a comparison between United States and Finland. Cross-Cultural Research53(4): 410–427.
16.
CuocoAArcadiPFiguraMC, et al. (2022) Designing and conducting qualitative research across countries and cultures: challenges for inclusiveness and rigour. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing21(8): 873–879.
17.
DamingerA (2019) The cognitive dimension of household labor. American Sociological Review84(4): 609–633.
18.
EerolaPNärviJTeräväJ, et al. (2021) Negotiating parenting practices: the arguments and justifications of Finnish couples. Families, Relationships and Societies10(1): 119–135.
19.
FairchildLDuncanLG (2025) “I now see my toddler as a helper, not just somebody in need of help”: raising Helpful Toddlers training. Early Childhood Research Quarterly70: 1–18.
20.
FerreiraJMMidgetteAJ (2024) Learning and teaching care within the family: experiential learning reflecting informal teaching. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships41(4): 971–996.
21.
FuligniAJ (2019) The need to contribute during adolescence. Perspectives on Psychological Science14(3): 331–343.
22.
GaskinsS (2020) Integrating cultural values through everyday experiences. In: JensenLA (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Moral Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 186–202.
23.
GlennEN (2010) Forced to Care: Coercion and Caregiving in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24.
GraciaPGarcia‐RomanJOinasT, et al. (2020) Child and adolescent time use: a cross‐national study. Journal of Marriage and Family82(4): 1304–1325.
25.
HwangSH (2018) Family life education in Taiwan. In: RobilaMTaylorAC (eds) Global Perspectives on Family Life Education. Cham: Springer International, 49–62.
26.
JeffreyAJAugerRWPepperellJL (2013) “If we’re ever in trouble they’re always there”: a qualitative study of teacher-student caring. The Elementary School Journal114(1): 100–117.
27.
KakkarP (2016) Cultural variations on parenting: a cross cultural analysis between Indian and Finnish families. (Master's thesis, P. Kakkar). https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-201606042357
28.
LanYH (2018). The Core Competencies for Chinese Language Teachers in Taiwan: A Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach. Dissertation. 795. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/795
29.
LeeCFTangSM (2022) Young children’s housework participation in Taiwan: serial multiple mediations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(23): 15448.
30.
LiWXieY (2020) The influence of family background on educational expectations: a comparative study. Chinese Sociological Review52(3): 269–294.
31.
LinG-XMikolajczakMKellerH, et al. (2023) Parenting culture(s): ideal-parent beliefs across 37 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology54(1): 4–24.
32.
MaltiTSpeidelR (2024) Development of prosociality and the effects of adversity. Nature Reviews Psychology3: 524–535.
33.
Martinez-MoraMGDahlA (2025) Young children's and caregivers' evaluations about household helping: balancing the interests of helper and recipient. Child Development, Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.14216.
34.
Mejía-ArauzRRogoffBDexterA (2022) Advances in understanding Learning by Observing and Pitching in to family and community endeavours (LOPI). Introduction to the special issue. Journal for the Study of Education and Development45(3): 479–493.
35.
MentaGLepinteurA (2021) Boys don’t cry (or do the dishes): family size and the housework gender gap. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization186: 164–188.
36.
MesmanJEmmenRA (2021). Cultural perspectives on parenting. The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and parenting, 97-114.
37.
MidgetteAJFerreiraJM (2024) Conceptualizing care: US and Finnish caregivers’ reflections on caregiving within the family. Journal of Child and Family Studies33(1): 253–270.
38.
NoddingsN (2002) Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
39.
NomaguchiKMilkieMA (2019) What should children learn? Americans’ changing socialization values, 1986–2018. Socius5: 237802311987901.
40.
O'BrienM (2010) The conceptualization and measurement of need: a key to guiding policy and practice in children's services. Child & Family Social Work15(4): 432–440.
41.
OchsEKremer-SadlikT (2013) Fast-forward Family: Home, Work, and Relationships in Middle-Class America. Univ of California Press.
42.
Padilla‐WalkerLMCarloGNielsonMG (2015) Does helping keep teens protected? Longitudinal bidirectional relations between prosocial behavior and problem behavior. Child Development86(6): 1759–1772.
43.
Padilla‐WalkerLMCarloGMemmott‐ElisonMK (2018) Longitudinal change in adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence28(3): 698–710.
44.
ParkHLauAS (2016) Socioeconomic status and parenting priorities: child independence and obedience around the world. Journal of Marriage and Family78(1): 43–59.
45.
RautakiviTSiriprasertchokRMelinH (2022) A Critical Evaluation of Individualism, Collectivism and Collective Action. Tampere University Press, 191.
46.
RogoffBMejía-ArauzR (2022) The key role of community in Learning by Observing and Pitching in to family and community endeavours. Journal for the Study of Education and Development45(3): 494–548.
47.
RogoffBMorelliG (1989) Perspectives on children’s development from cultural psychology. American Psychologist44(2): 343–348.
48.
SequeiraME (2023) Fairness, partner choice, and punishment: an ethnographic study of cooperative behavior among children in Helsinki, Finland. Ethos51(2): 217–233.
49.
ShihYP (2019) Parenting in Three-generation Taiwanese families: the dynamics of collaboration and conflicts. In: Transitions into Parenthood: Examining the Complexities of Childrearing. Emerald Publishing Limited, 231–256.
50.
SpinradTLGalDE (2018) Fostering prosocial behavior and empathy in young children. Current opinion in psychology20: 40–44.
51.
StevensonB (2016) Children’s independence: a conceptual argument for connecting the conduct of everyday life and learning in Finland. Children's Geographies15(4): 439–451.
52.
SuYChungYH (2023) Exploring Taiwanese preschool children’s perspectives on the value of caring. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal31(4): 492–511.
53.
TomaselloM (2020) The adaptive origins of uniquely human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B375(1803): 20190493.
54.
TrontoJ (2013) Democratic caring and global responsibilities for care. In: Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Hollywood, CA, 28-30 March 2013, 1–10.
55.
YehK-HYiC-CTsaoW-C, et al. (2013) Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: a comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology28(3): 277–296.
56.
ZhangXMadureira FerreiraJLiuJ, et al. (2025) Learning to care on one’s own: Chinese children’s caregivers’ reflections on family care. Family Relations74(1): 288–307.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
