Girls’ empowerment programmes have been celebrated as the ‘Smarter Economics’ of pulling girls and families out of poverty; and critiqued as neoliberal strategies for ‘delivering gendered equality through responsibilised selves. These oppositional accounts, conceptualised within institutions of the Global North, present girls as ‘victims’ in different ways, adopting narrow, liberal conceptions of agency and empowerment. Analysing a girls’ empowerment programme from south India, we argue that agency is a relational quality embedded within social relationships. Based on this understanding, we present the ethical need and possibilities for going beyond frameworks that individualise empowerment and position it as ‘rescue’ and ‘responsibilisation.’
BlanchardJFO’NeilJRameshBM, et al. (2005) Understanding the social and cultural contexts of female sex workers in Karnataka, India: implications for prevention of HIV infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases191(1:S): 139–146. DOI: 10.1086/425273.
3.
BordonaroL (2012) Agency does not mean freedom. Cape Verdean street children and the politics of children’s agency. Children’s Geographies10(4): 413–426. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2012.726068.
4.
BordonaroLPayneR (2014) Children ’ s Geographies Ambiguous agency : critical perspectives on social interventions with children and youth in Africa, (December): 37–41. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2012.726065.
5.
BoydenJ (1997) Children and the policy maker: a comparative perspective on the globalization of childhood. In: JamesAProutA (eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. London: Falmer, 190–229.
6.
Bühler-NiederbergerDSchwittekJ (2014) Young children in Kyrgyzstan: agency in tight hierarchical structures. Childhood21(4): 502–516. DOI: 10.1177/0907568213496658.
7.
ChantS (2008) The “feminisation of poverty” and the “feminisation” of anti-poverty programmes: room for revision?Journal of Development Studies44(2): 153–186.
8.
ChantS (2016a) Galvanizing girls for development? Critiquing the shift from ‘smart’ to ‘smarter economics. Progress in Development Studies16(4): 314–328. DOI: 10.1177/1464993416657209.
9.
ChantS (2016b) Addressing world poverty through women and girls: a feminised solution. Sight and Life Magazine30(2): 58–62.
10.
ChantSBrickellK (2013) Domesticating (and depatriarchalizing) the development agenda. In: RaiSNWaylenG (eds) New Frontiers in Feminist Political Economy. Oxon: Taylor and Francis, 85–113.
11.
CorsaroW (1997) The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
12.
DurhamD (2008) Apathy and agency. The romance of agency and youth in Botswana. In: ColeJ.DurhamD. (eds). Figuring the future. Globalization and the temporalities of children and youth. Santa: Fe´: School for Advanced Research Press, 151–178.
13.
EsserFBaaderMSBetzT, et al. (2016) Reconceptualising agency and childhood. In: EsserFBaaderMSBetzT, et al. (eds) Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood: An Introduction. Oxon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315722245.
14.
FingersonL (2005) Agency and the body in adolescent menstrual talk. Childhood12(1): 91–110. DOI: 10.1177/0907568205049894.
15.
JamesAProutA (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press.
16.
KabeerN (2005) Gender equality and women’s empowerment: a critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender and Development13(1): 13–24. DOI: 10.1080/13552070512331332273.
17.
KabeerN (2012) Empowerment, citizenship and gender justice: a contribution to locally grounded theories of change in women’s lives. Ethics and Social Welfare6(3): 216–232. DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2012.704055.
18.
KhaderS (2018) Passive empowerment: how women’s agency became women doing it all. Philosophical Topics46(2): 141–164.
19.
MaithreyiR (2021) Educating Youth: Regulation through Psychosocial Skilling in India. New Delhi: Sage Publishing.
20.
MccarthyA (2014) Agency and salvation in christian child rescue in colonial India: Preena and Amy Carmichael. In: ChoiHJollyM (eds) Divine Domesticities: Christian Paradoxes in Asia and the Pacific, 227–246. ANU epresshttp://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p298891/pdf/ch085.pdf
21.
MeyerJWJeppersonRL (2000) The ‘actors’ of modern society: the cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory18(1): 100–120. DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00090.
22.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and International Institute for Population Studies (2019) National Family Health Survey - 5 District Fact Sheet Koppal Karnataka. Mumbai. Available at:http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-5_FCTS/KA/Koppal.pdf
23.
MorrisonFCreeVRuchG, et al. (2019) Containment: exploring the concept of agency in children’s statutory encounters with social workers. Childhood26(1): 98–112. DOI: 10.1177/0907568218810101.
24.
NandedkarL (2017) Translating MDG 3: Gender, Empowerment and the Adolescent Girl in Maharashtra India. New Zealand: The University of Waikato.
25.
OswellD (2012) The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PrüglETrueJ (2014) Equality means business? Governing gender through transnational public-private partnerships. Review of International Political Economy21(6): 1137–1169.
27.
RamK (2009) ‘A new consciousness must come’: Affectivity and movement in Tamil dalit women’s activist engagement with cosmopolitan modernity. In: WerbnerP (ed) Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism: Rooted, Feminist and Vernacular Perspectives. Oxford: Berg, 135–155.
28.
RoyS (2017) Enacting/disrupting the will to empower: feminist governance of “child marriage” in Eastern India. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society42(4): 1–25.
29.
StoecklinD (2013) Theories of action in the field of child participation: In search of explicit frameworks. Childhood20(4): 443–457. DOI: 10.1177/0907568212466901.
30.
TarachandKC (1991) Devadasi Custom: Rural Social Structure and Flesh Markets. New Delhi: Reliance Publishing House.
31.
TrnkaSTrundleC (2014) Competing responsibilities: moving beyond neoliberal responsibilisation. Anthropological Forum: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology24(2): 136–153. DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2013.879051.
32.
WellsK (2018) Childhood Studies. Making Young Subjects. Cambridge: Polity Press.
