This article presents the results of qualitative research conducted with 20 adoptees, specifically the experiences of four French adoptees from Romania, who discovered significant irregularities in their adoptions. In the form of four ethnographic cases followed by a discussion, it describes the adoptees' bewilderment at their pre-adoptive trajectories and discusses the absence of collective frameworks and narratives in France through which they could apprehend their individual trajectories.
BrownTWRobyJ (2016) Exploitation of intercountry adoption. Toward common understanding and action. Adoption Quarterly19(2): 63–80.
5.
Ceniza ChoyC (2013) To make historical their own stories. Adoptee narratives as Asian American history. In: Global Families. A History of Asian International Adoption in America. New York: NYU Press, pp. 131–160.
6.
CollardCLeblicI (2009) Enfances en péril: Abandon, capture, inceste. Anthropologie et Sociétés33(1): 7.
7.
DenéchèreY (2013) L’adoption des ‘enfants de Ceauşescu’. Un fait social au cœur des relations franco-roumaines dans les années 1980. Cahier d’histoire Immédiate: 171–184.
8.
DenéchèreYDrouxJ (2015) Enfants et relations internationales. Chantiers de recherche. Relations Internationales161(1): 3–12.
9.
DenéchèreYScutaruB (2010) International adoption of Romanian children and Romania’s admission to the European Union (1990-2007). Eastern Journal of European Studies1(1): 135–151.
10.
DickensJ (2002) The paradox of inter-country adoption: Analysing Romania’s experience as a sending country. International Journal of Social Welfare11(1): 76–83.
11.
GesteiraS (2014a) Buscar el ‘origen biológico’ Parentesco y familia en organizaciones de personas ‘adoptadas’. Kairos. Revista de temas sociales 33. San Luis: Universidad Nacional de San Luis, pp. 1–25.
12.
GesteiraS (2014b) Más allá de la apropiación criminal de niños : el surgimiento de organizaciones de personas ‘adoptadas’ que buscan su ‘identidad biológica’ en Argentina. Runa35(1): 61–76.
13.
HCCH (2008) The Implementation and Operation of the 1993 Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention. Guide to Good Practice No.1. Bristol, England: Jordan Publishing Limited.
14.
IusmenI (2013) The EU and international adoption from Romania. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family27(1): 1–27.
15.
JacobyWLataianuGLataianuCM (2009) Success in slow motion. The europeanization of Romanian child protection policy. The Review of International Organizations4(2): 111–133.
16.
KimE (2010) Adopted Territory. Transnational Korean Adoptees and the Politics of Belonging. Duke University Press Books.
17.
KligmanG (1992) Abortion and international adoption in Post-Ceausescu Romania. Feminist Studies18(2): 405–419.
18.
KligmanG (1995) Political demography. The banning of abortion in Ceausescu’s Romania. In: Conceiving the New World Order. The Global Politics of Reproduction. University of California Press, pp. 234–255.
19.
LégautJ-P (2009) Les enfants de l’État. Bulletin de l’Institut Pierre Renouvin29(1): 79–88.
20.
LégautJ-P (2019) Enfants Perdus de Roumanie. Histoire Des Orphelinats de Ceausescu. Chroniques. Paris: Vendémiaire.
21.
MarreD (2009) Los silencios de la adopción en España. Revista de Antropología Social30.
22.
NeaguM (2015) Children by request. Romania’s children between rights and international politics. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family29(2): 215–236.
23.
OHCHR (2016) Report of the special rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. A/HRC/34/55, December. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
24.
PattonS (2000) BirthMarks. Transracial Adoption in Contemporary America. New York: New York University Press.
25.
PopescuRMunteanAJufferF (2020) Adoption in Romania. Historical perspectives and recent statistics. Adoption Quarterly23(1): 1–26.
26.
PostR (2007) Romania. For Export Only. The Untold Story of the Romanian ‘Orphans’. Bruxelles: EuroComment Diffusion.
27.
RobyJLIfeJ (2009) Human rights, politics and intercountry adoption. An examination of two sending countries. International Social Work52(5): 661–671.
28.
Salvo AgogliaIAlfaro MonsalveK (2019) ‘Irregular adoptions’ in Chile: New political narratives about the right to Know One’s Origins. Children & Society33(3): 201–212.
29.
San RománBRotabiKS (2019) Rescue, red tape, child abduction, illicit adoptions, and discourse: Intercountry adoption attitudes in Spain. International Social Work62(1): 198–211. DOI: 10.1177/0020872817714314.
30.
ScutaruB (2015) Images d’enfants roumains et médias occidentaux. La construction d’une cause (1989-1990). Relations Internationales161(1): 95.
31.
SelmanP (2008) From Bucharest to Beijing. Changes in countries sending children for international adoption 1990 to 2006. In: International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice. London: John Wiley, pp. 41–69.
32.
UNICEF (1998) Intercountry Adoption. Innocenti Digest 4. Florence, Italy: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.
33.
VerderyK (1996) From parent-state to family patriarchs. Gender and nation in contemporary Eastern Europe. In: What Was Socialism and what Comes Next ?Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 61–82.
34.
VillaltaC (2010) De los derechos de los adoptantes al derecho a la identidad: Los procedimientos de adopción y la apropiación criminal de niños en la Argentina: De los derechos de los adoptantes al derecho a la identidad. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology15(2): 338–362.
