South Korea experienced international scrutiny over its irregular intercountry adoption practices in the 1980s. However, it eventually came to be viewed as a model of transparent and efficient adoptions. This façade disguises an orphan adoption system that has become entrenched over the decades. Today, adoptees continue to lobby for their right to origins. This paper explores South Korea’s laws and policies, which nullified the rights of adoptees, and it calls for receiving countries to assume co-responsibility to restore these rights.
JungMParkM (2020) Current state and solution of the U.S. legislation for the problem of adoptees’ non-acquisition of U.S. citizenship. Foreign Legislation: Trends and Analysis, National Assembly Research Service48.
11.
KaneS (1993) The movement of children for international adoption: an epidemiologic perspective. The Social Science Journal30: 323–339.
12.
KimCCarrollT (1975) Intercountry adoption of South Korean orphans: a lawyer’s guide. Journal of Family Law14(2): 223–253.
13.
LeeK (2017) International legal protection of the rights of the child in intercountry adoption. PhD Thesis. Republic of Korea: Seoul National University.
14.
LeeK (2021) The global orphan adoption system: south korea’s impact on its origin and development. Seoul: KoRoot.
15.
LovelockK (2000) intercountry adoption as migratory practice: a comparative analysis of intercountry adoption and immigration policy and practice in the United States, Canada, and New Zealand in the post WWII period. International Migration Review34: 907–949.
16.
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (MOHASA) (1958) Kunkuk 10junyn Bogunsahoihangjung-Kaygwan[10th Anniversary of founding of government; health and social administration overview].
17.
Ministry of Health and Welfare of the Republic of Korea (MOHAW) (2007∼2020) Annual Press Release on Adoption Day withan’guk u˘i Kukoe Ibyang Hyo˘nhwang[The Current State of Korea's Domestic and Overseas Adoptions].
18.
Ministry of Health and Welfare (2008) International Adoptee Survey and Research on Efficient Post-Adoption Service.
19.
OhA (2015) To Save the Children of Korea: The Cold War Origins of International Adoption. Calif: Stanford University Press.
20.
OhJLeeHLeeH, et al (2008) Research for the protection of the rights of abused child and public intervention to the parental rights. Korean Child Welfare Studies21: 29–57.
21.
SelmanP (2014) Intercountry adoption of children from Asia in the twenty-first century. Children’s Geographies13(3): 1–16.
22.
SmolinDM (2013) The corrupting influence of the united states on a vulnerable intercountry adoption system: a guide for stakeholders, hague and non-hague nations, NGOs, and concerned parties. Journal of Law and Family Studies15: 81–151.
23.
Social Welfare Services (2004) Five Decades of SWS (1954-2003).
UN CRC (1996) Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 44 of the Convention Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Republic of Korea (CRC/C/15/Add.51).
26.
UN CRC (2003) Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 44 of the Convention Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Republic of Korea (CRC/C/15/Add.197).
27.
UN CRC (2011) Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 44 of the Convention Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Republic of Korea (CRC/C/KOR/CO/3–4).
28.
UN CRC (2013) General Comment No. 14: On the Rights of the Child to Have His or Her Best Interests Taken as a Primary Consideration (CRC/C/GC/14).
29.
U.N. Human Rights Council (2010) Guidelines for the alternative care of children (A/Res/64/142). New York, NY: United Nations. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4c3acd162.html.
30.
U.N. Human Rights Council (2013) Birth registration and the right of everyone to recognition everywhere as a person before the law: Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/RES/22/7). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/53bfacfa4.html (accessed 3 April 2021).
