In 2018, the Ethiopian government banned intercountry adoptions due to detected irregularities. This paper draws from the experiences of Spanish adoptive families, providing evidence of these irregularities and other abuses substantiated by adoptive families during their “search for origins” or reconnection with their children’s birth families. We argue that these searches and contacts within the adoptive triad represent informal reparative initiatives among Spanish adoptive families.
CadoretA (2004) Pluri-parentesco y familia de referencia. In: MarreDBestardJ (eds) La Adopción Y El Acogimiento: Presente Y Perspectivas. Barcelona: Estudis d’Antropologia Social i Cultural, 273–282.
6.
CantwellN (2003) La adopción internacional: un comentario sobre el número de niños «adoptables» y el número de personas que buscan adoptar internacionalmente. Boletín para los jueces de la Conferencia de la Haya de Derecho Internacional PrivadoV: 40–41. https://www.hcch.net/upload/spring2003_s.pdf (accessed 18 June 2020).
7.
CheneyK (2023) Why The Hague Convention is not enough: addressing enabling environments for criminality in intercountry adoption. In: NelenHSiegelD (eds) Organized Crime in the 21st Century. Cham: Springer, 191–206.
8.
CheneyKRotabiK (2017) Addicted to orphans: how the global orphan industrial complex jeopardizes local child protection systems. In: HarkerCHörschelmannK (eds) Conflict, Violence and Peace. Geographies of Children and Young People. Singapore: Springer, 1–19.
9.
CheneyKUcembeS (2019) The orphan industrial complex: the charitable commodification of children and its consequences for child protection. In: CheneyKSinervoA (eds) Disadvantaged Childhoods and Humanitarian Intervention. Palgrave Studies on Children and Development. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 37–61.
10.
Clemente-MartínezCK (2022) Active waiting and hope in transnational adoptions: Nepali birth families and their children. Asian Studies Review47(3): 426–443.
De LorenziMGallegoAFernándezP, et al. (2019) El acceso a los orígenes en Argentina, Chile y España. América Latina Hoy83: 7–23.
13.
DenéchèreYMacedoF (2023) Étude historique sur les pratiques illicites dans l’adoption internationale en France. Université d’Angers. https://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-03972497v1 (accessed 2 March 2024).
14.
DuressaA (2002) Guddifachaa”: Adoption Practice in Oromo Society with Particular Reference to the Borana Oromo. PhD Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
15.
FronekPRotabiKSCommonR (2021) Intercountry adoption swimming against the tide: restitution in Samoa. Childhood28(4): 525–539.
16.
GallegoA (2014) La mirada autoetnográfica entre infinitas miradas en la construcción del conocimiento aplicado al Trabajo Social en la adopción internacional. Humanismo y Trabajo Social13–14: 309–333.
17.
GallegoA (2016) “Mi hijo me reclama ver a su familia…”: la búsqueda de orígenes en el contexto hispano-etíope. In GallegoAEspinosaM (ed) Miradas no adultocéntricas sobre la infancia y la adolescencia: Transexualidad, orígenes en la adopción, ciudadanía y justicia juvenil. Granada, España: Comares, pp.67-84.
18.
GallegoAMClemente-MartínezCK (2021) Irregularities in transnational adoptions and child appropriations: challenges for reparation practices. Childhood28(4): 467–476.
19.
GrotevantHDWrobelGMVon KorffL, et al. (2007) Many faces of openness in adoption: perspectives of adopted adolescents and their parents. Adoption Quarterly10(3–4): 79–101.
20.
HailuD (2017) Children for families: an ethnography of illegal intercountry adoption from Ethiopia. Adoption Quarterly20(3): 201–221.
HögbackaR (2016) Global Families, Inequality and Transnational Adoption: The De-kinning of First Mothers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HögbackaR (2017) Intercountry adoption and the social production of abandonment. International Social Work62(1): 271–282.
27.
ISS/IRC Centro Internacional de Referencia para los Derechos del Niño Privado de Familia del Servicio Social Internacional (2006) «Adopción simple» versus «adopción plena»: una elección nacional con repercusiones internacionales. Boletín mensual1(January): 1–2. https://iss-ssi.org/index.php/en/2-uncategorised/235-boletines-mensuales (accessed 3 January 2020).
28.
KastroADulleaK (2020) Community-based prevention of child trafficking in Southern Ethiopia. International Social Work63(2): 133–146.
29.
LoiblEC (2021) The aftermath of transnational illegal adoptions: redressing human rights violations in the intercountry adoption system with instruments of transitional justice. Childhood28(4): 477–491.
30.
LoiblEMackenzieS (2023) Organisation of crime in the transnational adoption market. In: NelenHSiegelD (eds) Organized Crime in the 21st Century. Cham: Springer, 25–41.
31.
MarreDBriggsK (2009) International Adoption: Global Inequalities and the Circulation of Children. New York: New York University Press.
32.
MarreDClemente-MartínezC (2022) Suprimir la identidad para “reparar” el (mal) origen. In: De LorenziM (ed) Derecho a conocer los orígenes de niños, niñas y adolescentes. Buenos Aires: Editorial Rubinzal Culzoni, 99–118.
33.
McColdPWachtelT (2003) In pursuit of paradigm: a theory of restorative justice. In: XIII World Congress of Criminology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10–15 August 2003, pp. 1–3. https://www.iirp.edu/images/pdf/paradigm.pdf (accessed 28 February 2024).
34.
Medina RodríguezMVGallego MolineroAClemente-MartínezCK (2024) Búsqueda de orígenes en procesos adoptivos: Dificultades, tensiones y desafíos. In: Caldevilla DomínguezD (ed) Legalidad derecho y política. Marcos jurídicos parra un nuevo contrato social. Berlin: Peter Lang.
35.
MezmurBD (2010) “The sins of the ‘saviours’”: Child Trafficking in the Context of Intercountry Adoption in Africa, Paper presented at the Special Commission of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, The Hague Netherlands, 3. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/a901d48c-3eba-4a9a-8026-fe42681e8126.pdf (accessed 15 March 2020).
36.
MezmurBD (2015) From Angelina (to Madonna) to Zoe’s ark: what are the A–Z lessons for intercountry adoptions in Africa? In: BallardRGoodnoNCochranR, et al. (eds) The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 651–675.
37.
PatriziE (2021) Redressing forced removals of Yenish children in Switzerland in the 20th century: an analysis through transitional justice lens. Childhood28(4): 540–554.
38.
PNUD (2021/22) Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2021/22: Tiempos inciertos, vidas inestables. Configurar nuestro futuro en un mundo en transformación. https://report.hdr.undp.org/es/(accessed 27 February 2024).
39.
QuirozPA (2011) Restorative justice and the impact of thr Hague Convention on US transnational adoption. Comtemporary Justicie Review14(4): 407–424.
40.
RotabiKS (2010) From Guatemala to Ethiopia: shifts in intercountry adoption leaves Ethiopia vulnerable for child sales and other unethical practices. Social Work and Society News Magazine8 June: 1–7.
41.
RotabiKSBromfieldNF (2017) From Intercountry Adoption to Global Surrogacy: A Human Rights History and New Fertility Frontiers. Abingdon: Routledge.
42.
RotabiKSBunkersKM (2008) Intercountry adoption reform based on the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: an update on Guatemala in 2008. Social Work and Society News Magazine.November: 1–7.
43.
San RománBRotabiKS (2017) Rescue, red tape, child abduction, illicit adoptions, and discourse: intercountry adoption attitudes in Spain. International Social Work62: 198–211.
44.
SelmanP (2009) The movement of children for international adoption: developments and trends in receiving states and states of origin, 1998–2004. In: MarreDBriggsL (eds) International Adoption Global Inequalities and the Circulation of Children. New York: New York University Press, 32–51.
45.
SteenrodS (2021) The legacy of exploitation in intercountry adoptions from Ethiopia: “we were under the impression that her birth parents had died”. Adoption Quarterly25(2): 81–108.
46.
TorpeyJ (2015) The political field of reparations. World Environment and Island Studies5(2): 73–79.
47.
UN (2005) Principios y directrices básicos sobre el derecho a un recurso y reparación para las víctimas de violaciones manifiestas del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos y violaciones graves del derecho internacional humanitario. March.
48.
WenarL (2006) Reparations for the future. Journal of Social Philosophy27(3): 396–405.