Contemporary considerations of childhood research ethics recognize children’s competence and agency, their rights to be informed about research and their capabilities to negotiate participation. There is also a recognition of children’s assent as ongoing and formed in the relationship with the researcher. Drawing on two different data sets, we investigate information and assent as they appear in child–researcher, child–child and child–parent interactions. We argue for the need to pay attention to participants’ own meaning-making with regard to informed assent, and show how the presence or non-presence of the researcher in data collection may affect information and assent.
AldersonPMorrowV (2004) Ethics, Social Research and Consulting with Children and Young People, 2nd edn.Ilford: Barnardo’s.
2.
AllenL (2009) ‘Caught in the act’: Ethics committee review and researching the sexual culture of schools. Qualitative Research9(4): 395–410.
3.
CameronDFrazerEHarveyPet al. (1993) Ethics, advocacy and empowerment: Issues of method in researching language. Language & Communication13(2): 81–94.
4.
ChristensenPJamesA (eds) (2008) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
5.
CibulkaPAndrénM (2016) Self-touching behaviour in social interaction: Shifting in and out of speakership. In: CibulkaP (ed.) A Universal of Human Interaction? Manual Movement as Interactional Practice in Spoken and Signed Conversation (PhD thesis). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. Available at: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/42407.
6.
CocksA (2006) The ethical maze: Finding an inclusive path towards gaining children’s agreement to research participation. Childhood13(2): 247–266.
7.
CorsaroWA (2015) The Sociology of Childhood, 4th edn.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
8.
DanbySFarrellA (2005) Opening the research conversation. In: FarrellA (ed.) Ethical Research with Children. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 49–67.
9.
D’ArcyA (2013) Advances in sociolinguistic transcription methods. In: MallinsonCChildsBVan HerkG (eds) Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications. London: Routledge, pp. 187–190.
10.
DockettSPerryB (2011) Researching with young children: Seeking assent. Child Indicators Research4: 231–247.
11.
EldénS (2013a) Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and ‘children’s voices’. Childhood20(1): 66–81.
12.
EldénS (2013b) ‘Your child is just wonderful’: On ethics and access in research with children. Journal of Comparative Social Work2: 1–24.
13.
FlewittR (2005) Conducting research with young children: Some ethical considerations. Early Child Development and Care175(6): 553–565.
14.
FordKSankeyJCrispJ (2007) Development of children’s assent documents using a child-centred approach. Journal of Child Health Care11(1): 19–28.
15.
ForresterM (2010) Ethnomethodology and adult-child conversation: Whose development? In: GardnerHForresterM (eds) Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Insights from Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 42–58.
16.
GabbJ (2010) Home truths: Ethical issues in family research. Qualitative Research10(4): 461–478.
17.
GardnerHForresterM (eds) (2010) Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Insights from Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
18.
GarfinkelH (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
GordonH (2013) Beyond the observer’s paradox: The audio-recorder as a resource for the display of identity. Qualitative Research13(3): 299–317.
20.
HarcourtDConroyH (2005) Informed assent: Ethics and processes when researching with young children. Early Child Development and Care175(6): 567–577.
21.
HarrisCJacksonLMayblinLet al. (2015) ‘Big Brother welcomes you’: Exploring innovative methods for research with children and young people outside of the home and school environments. Qualitative Research15(5): 583–599.
22.
HollandSWilliamsAForresterD (2014) Navigating ethical moments when researching substance misuse with parents and their children. Qualitative Research14(4): 411–427.
23.
JamesAProutA (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, 2nd edn.London; New York: Routledge.
24.
LabovW (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
LinellP (2005) En dialogisk grammatik? In: AnwardJNordbergB (eds) Samtal och grammatik: Studier i svenskt samtalsspraâk. Lund: Studentlitteratur, pp. 231–328.
26.
MayallB (2002) Towards a Sociology for Childhood: Thinking from Children’s Lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27.
MazzoniVHarcourtDS (2014) An international experience of research with children: Moving forward on the idea of children’s participation. Qualitative Research14(2): 252–268.
28.
MonahanTFisherJA (2010) Benefits of ‘observer effects’: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research10(3): 357–376.
29.
MondadaL (2014) The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 32–56.
30.
MorrowV (2008) Ethical dilemmas in research with children and young people about their social environments. Children’s Geographies6(1): 49–61.
31.
MortensenKK (2015) Language and sexuality in an online-mediated world: Interactional workings of desire in heterosexual online dating. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
32.
OttesjöC (2015) Insamling och bearbetning av talspråksmaterial [Collection and analysis of spoken language data]. In: BoydSEricssonS (eds) Sociolingvistik i Praktiken [Sociolinguistics in Practice]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, pp. 75–92.
33.
PinterAZandianS (2015) ‘I thought it would be tiny little one phrase that we said, in a huge big pile of papers’: Children’s reflections on their involvement in participatory research. Qualitative Research15(2): 235–250.
34.
RenoldEHollandSRossNJet al. (2008) ‘Becoming participant’: Problematizing ‘informed consent’ in participatory research with young people in care. Qualitative Social Work7(4): 427–447.
35.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
36.
SchegloffES (1992) On talk and its institutional occasions. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–134.
37.
SpeerSAHutchbyI (2003) From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology37(2): 315–337.
38.
StreeckJGoodwinCLeBaronC (eds) (2011) Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
The Swedish code of statutes (SFS) (2003) Om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor [Concerning the ethical review of research involving humans], SFS number: 2003: 460. Available at: http://www.epn.se/media/2348/the_ethical_review_act.pdf.
40.
TrontoJC (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. London: Routledge.
