A discussion on the ethical context and barriers to include children’s voices in research and clarify the role of Research Ethic Committees. Twenty-one researchers from eight countries participated in two focus groups and ten individual in-depth interviews. The results highlight the need for reforming ethical regulations to facilitate greater and more meaningful participation of children and adolescent in research. This reform, however, requires a paradigm shift to balance the notions of protecting children and adolescents from harm with empowerment and autonomy.
AldersonP (2005) As crianças como pesquisadoras: os efeitos dos direitos de participação sobre a metodologia de pesquisa. Educação & Sociedade26(91): 419–442.
2.
AlvesHBritoISilvaT, et al. (2017) Adolescent pregnancy and local co-planning: a diagnostic approach based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. Revista de Enfermagem ReferênciaIV Série: 35–44. DOI: 10.12707/RIV16058.
3.
AlvesHBritoISilvaT, et al. (2020) ‘Fatores intervenientes da gravidez na adolescência a partir de um modelo de promoção da saúde baseado na comunidade’. Adolesc. Saúde17( 1): 08–17.
4.
AriésP (1981) História social da criança e da família. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.
5.
BrandãoCR (2003) A pergunta a várias mãos: a experiência da pesquisa no trabalho do educador. São Paulo: Cortez.
6.
BritoI (2018) Participatory health research in the education of health and social work professionals. In: WrightMKongatsK (eds) Participatory Health Research: Voices from Around the World. Cham: Springer, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8.
7.
CarrollTWGutmannMP (2011) The limits of autonomy: the belmont report and the history of childhood. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences66(1): 82–115.
8.
ChakrabortyKNansenBGibbsL, et al. (2012) Ethical negotiations: committees, methods and research with children. The International Journal of Children's Rights20(4): 541–553. DOI: 10.1163/157181812x634472.
9.
CraneSBroomeME (2017) Understanding ethical issues of research participation from the perspective of participating children and adolescents: a systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing14(3): 200–209.
10.
DoveESAvardDBlackL, et al. (2013) Emerging issues in paediatric health research consent forms in Canada: working towards best practices. BMC Medical Ethics14(1): 14–25. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-5.
11.
FrancischiniRFernandesN (2016) Os desafios da pesquisa ética com crianças. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)33(1): 61–69. DOI: 10.1590/1982-02752016000100007.
12.
FreireP (1981) Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
13.
FreireP (1992) Pedagogia da Esperança: um reencontro com a pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
14.
FreireP (2002) Educação como prática da liberdade. São PauloPaz e Terra.
15.
GallacherLAGallagherM (2008) Methodological immaturity in childhood research?Childhood15(4): 499–516.
16.
GiattiLL (2018) Pesquisa participativa em saúde: vertentes e veredas. São Paulo: Instituto de Saúde.
17.
GusmanCRRodriguesDARodriguesDA, et al. (2016) Trâmites éticos, ética e burocracia em uma experiência de pesquisa com população indígena. Saúde e Sociedade25(4): 930–942.
18.
HeinIMDe VriesMCTroostPW, et al. (2015) Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research. BMC Medical Ethics16(1): 76–83.
19.
HirataH (2014) ‘Gênero, classe e raça Interseccionalidade e consubstancialidade das relações sociais’. Tempo Social26(1): 61–73.
KipperDJ (2016) Ética em pesquisa com crianças e adolescentes: à procura de normas e diretrizes virtuosas. Revista Bioética24(1): 37–48.
26.
LunaF (2008) Consentimento livre e esclarecido: ainda uma ferramenta útil na ética em pesquisa. Ética em Pesquisa Temas Globais. Brasília: LetrasLivres/Editora UnB, 153–186.
27.
MartinsPCSaniAI (2020) Consent for research on violence against children: dilemmas and contradictions. Societies10(15): 15–7. DOI: 10.3390/soc10010015.
28.
MeadM (1963) Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29.
MelucciA (1997) Juventude, tempo e movimentos sociais. Revista Brasileira de Educação5/6: 5–14.
30.
MinayoMCS (2010) O desafio do conhecimento. 12th edition. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.
31.
PattonGCSawyerSMSantelliJS, et al. (2016) The Lancet Commissions: Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and Wellbeing. Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 387, 2423–2478. Available at: http://10.0.3.248/S0140-6736(16)00579-1.
RosembergFMarianoCLS (2010) A convenção internacional sobre os direitos da criança: debates e tensões. Cadernos de Pesquisa40(141): 693–728.
34.
PowellMAMcArthurMChalmersJ, et al. (2018) Sensitive topics in social research involving children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology21(6): 647–660.
35.
SantosBSMenesesMP (2010). Epistemologias do Sul. São Paulo: Editora Cortez.
36.
ShierH (2015) Children as researchers in Nicaragua: children’s consultancy to transformative research. Global Studies of Childhood5(2): 206–219.
37.
SillmannMSáM (2015) ‘A recusa de tratamento médico por crianças e adolescentes: uma análise a partir da competência de Gillick’. Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil em perspectiva1(2): 70–89.
38.
TanakaLHSantanaC (eds), (2018) ‘Grupo Focal como importante ferramenta de pesquisa participativa em Saúde’, Pesquisa participativa em saúde: vertentes e veredas. São Paulo: Instituto de Saúde.
WallersteinNDuranBOetzelJG, et al. (2018) Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity. 3rd edition. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
42.
WallersteinNDuranB (2010) Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health100(Suppl 1): S40–S46. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036.
YbarraMLPrescottTLPhillipsGL, et al. (2016) Ethical considerations in recruiting online and implementing a text messaging-based HIV prevention program with gay, bisexual, and queer adolescent males. Journal of Adolescent Health59(1): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.020.
47.
ZuluJMAliJHallezK, et al. (2018) Ethics challenges and guidance related to research involving adolescent post-abortion care: a scoping review. Reproductive Health, 15, pp. 71–81.
