Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research ethics boards adjudicate between competing sacred discourses in the knowledge industries. The traditional rights of researchers to initiate and conduct enquiry, the rights of research subjects to have stewardship over their own experiential knowledge and the legal responsibilities of universities and other institutions often compete in the process of adjudication. The justification narrative leading to the establishment of boards is reviewed along with the governmental and institutional actions that have led to the ethics codes in existence. Also discussed is divisiveness between researchers and boards, changes brought about by shifting moral bases, trust and confidentiality, privacy, informed consent, the creation of cultures of research ethics and the unresolved issues awaiting future discussion.

Keywords

entitlements in research future problems history of research ethics informed consent research ethics boards

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appell, G.N. , Ed. (1978). Ethical dilemmas in anthropological inquiry: A case book. Waltham, MA: Crossroads Press .

Bok, S. (1984). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Vintage .

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon .

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon .

Freedman, B. (1987). Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: A proposed explication . IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 9, 7-10 .

Hayes, G.J. , Hayes, S.C. and Dykstra, T. (1995). A survey of university institutional review boards: Characteristics, policies, and procedures . RIB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17, 1-6 .

Horowitz, I.L. (1967). The rise and fall of Project Camelot. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press .

Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago, IL: Aldine .

Jones, J.H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment, expanded edn. New York: Free Press .

10.

Katz, J. , Capron, A.M. and Glass, E.S. (1972). Experimentation with human beings: The authority of the investigator, subject, profession and the state in the human experimentation process. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .

11.

Keyserlingk, E.W. , Glass, K. , Kogan, S. and Gauthier, S. (1995). Proposed guidelines for the participation of persons with dementia as research subjects . Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 38, 319-362 .

12.

Kirsch, G.E. (1999). Ethical dilemmas in feminist research: The politics of location. Albany, NY: State University of New York .

13.

Mencken, H.L. (1959). The vintage Mencken. Gathered by A. Cooke. New York: Vintage Books .

14.

Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. London: Routledge .

15.

Olesen, V.L. and Whittaker, E. (1968). The silent dialogue. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .

16.

Radin, P. (1926). Crashing thunder: The autobiography of a Winnebago Indian. New York: Appleton .

17.

Rynkiewich, M.A. and Spradley, J.P. , Eds. (1976). Ethics and anthropology: Dilemmas in fieldwork. New York: Wiley & Sons .

18.

Sieber, J.E. , Ed. (1981). Ethics of social research: Fieldwork, regulation and publication. New York: Springer-Verlag .

19.

Sieber, J.E. (1982). Deception in social research I: Kinds of deception and the wrongs they may involve . IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 4, 1-5 .

20.

Sieber, J.E. (1983). Deception in social research II: Evaluating the potential for harm or wrong . IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 5, 1-6 .

21.

Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous people. London: Zed Books .

22.

Tong, R. (1997). Feminist approaches to bioethics: Theoretical reflections and practical applications. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .

23.

Von Hoffman, N. (1970). Sociological snoopers . Washington Post, 30 January: B1, B9 .

24.

Wakin, E. (1992). Anthropology goes to war: Professional ethics and counterinsurgency in Thailand. Madison, WI: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin , Monograph Number 7.

25.

Weijer, C. , Shapiro, S. , Fuks, A. , Glass, K.C. and Skrutkowska, M. (1995). Monitoring clinical research: An obligation unfulfilled . Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152, 173-180 .

26.

Whittaker, E. (1981). Anthropological ethics, fieldwork and epistemological disjunctures . Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 437-451 .

27.

Whittaker, E. (1994). Decolonizing knowledge, toward a cross-cultural feminist ethic and methodology. In J.S. Grewal and H. Johnston (Eds.), The India-Canada relationship, exploring the political, economic and cultural dimensions, pp. 347-365. New Delhi: Sage Publications .

28.

Whittaker, E. (1999). Towards the ethical practice of social science. In A. Kazancigil and D. Makinson (Eds.), World social science report 1999, pp. 213-219. Paris: UNESCO/Elsevier .

Adjudicating entitlements: the emerging discourses of research ethics boards

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References