We examine whether having at least a portion of an endowment free from donor restrictions (i.e., a board-designated endowment [“BDE”]) affects endowment objectives related to intergenerational equity, rainy-day funding, or accumulation. Our results provide some evidence consistent with restricted endowments serving accumulation or rainy-day funding objectives. Holding at least some funds in a BDE does not appear to influence the attainment of these objectives. Moreover, we find no evidence that a BDE incrementally affects a nonprofit organization’s (“NPO”) sensitivity of spending on programs, administration, or capital expenditures to operating revenue. Finally, we also do not find any evidence that BDEs alleviate agency conflicts associated with unrestricted net assets with respect to spending on programs or CEO compensation. While BDEs have unique features that should facilitate greater flexibility than donor-restricted endowments and greater board oversight than unrestricted net assets held outside an endowment, our results suggest they do not produce different outcomes in spending.
BalsamS.HarrisE. E. (2018). Nonprofit executive incentive pay. Review of Accounting Studies, 23, 1665–1714.
2.
BowmanW.TuckmanH. P.YoungD. R. (2012). Issues in nonprofit finance research: Surplus, endowment, and endowment portfolios. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 560–579.
3.
BrownJ. R.DimmockS. G.KangJ.WeisbennerS. J. (2014). How university endowments respond to financial market shocks: Evidence and implications. American Economic Review, 104(3), 931–962.
4.
CalabreseT. D. (2013). Running on empty: The operating reserves of U.S. nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 23(5), 281–302.
5.
CalabreseT. D.ElyT. L. (2017). Understanding and measuring endowment in public charities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(4), 659–873.
6.
CalabreseT. D.ElyT. L. (2022). How US private foundations change payouts based on financial shocks: Revealed publicness or revealed privateness?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(1), 166–182.
7.
CalabreseT. D.GuptaA. (2019). A replication of “agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profit firms” (Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2006). Public Finance Review, 47(4), 747–774.
8.
Conti-BrownP. (2011). Scarcity amidst wealth: The law, finance, and culture of elite university endowments in financial crisis. Stanford Law Review, 63, 699–749.
9.
CoreJ. E.GuayW. R.VerdiS. (2006). Agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41, 307–333.
10.
DahiyaS.YermackD. (2021). Investment returns and distribution policies of non-profit endowment funds [Unpublished manuscript]. Georgetown University and New York University.
11.
DholeS.KhumawalaS. B.MishraS.RanasingheT. (2015). Executive compensation and regulation-imposed governance: Evidence from the California Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 443–466.
12.
ElyT. L.KatzJ.CalabreseT. D. (2023). Endowment building and use by nonprofits: An integration of theory and practice. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 34(2), 317–343.
13.
ExleyC. L.LehrN. H.TerryS. J. (2023). Nonprofits in good times and bad times. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 1(1), 42–79.
FismanR.HubbardR. G. (2003a). Endowments, governance, and the nonprofit form. In GlaeserE. L. (Ed.), The governance of not-for-profit organizations (pp.37–51). University of Chicago Press.
16.
FismanR.HubbardR. G. (2003b). The role of nonprofit endowments. In GlaeserE. L. (Ed.), The governance of not-for-profit organizations (pp.217–218). University of Chicago Press.
17.
FismanR.HubbardR. G. (2005). Precautionary savings and the governance of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2231–2243.
18.
GilbertT.HrdlickaC. (2015). Why are university endowments large and risky?The Review of Financial Studies, 28(9), 2643–2686.
19.
HansmannH. (1990). Why do universities have endowments?The Journal of Legal Studies, 19(1), 3–42.
20.
JonesC. L.KitchingK. A.RobertsA. A.SmithP. C. (2013). The spend-save decision: An analysis of how charities respond to revenue changes. Accounting Horizons, 27(1), 75–89.
21.
MensahY. M.WernerR. (2003). Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 293–323.
22.
MillerJ. L. (2002). The board as a monitor of organizational activity: The applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 429–450.
OstrowerF.StoneM. M. (2006). Governance: Research trends, gaps, and future prospects. In PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 612–628). Yale University Press.
QuH. (2021). Endowment for a rainy day? An empirical analysis of endowment spending by operating public charities. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(4), 571–594.
27.
RosenH. S.SappingtonA. J. (2019). The impact of endowment shocks on payouts. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(5), 690–716.
28.
YermackD. (2017). Donor governance and financial management in prominent US art museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(3), 215–235.
29.
YetmanM. H.YetmanR. J. (2012). The effects of governance on the accuracy of charitable expenses reported by nonprofit organizations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 738–767.
