The literature on nonprofit governance and boards has grown substantially during the past 50 years as researchers from a variety of disciplines and fields have studied governance systems and processes to examine how they are organized, the practices they employ, and their relations with and impacts on nonprofits. This essay offers a domain-based narrative review of the research on the governance of nonprofit organizations and how it has developed over these 50 years. Building on literature reviews and a Delphi study, we summarize the progression of nonprofit governance research, employ a multi-dimensional framework to summarize and assess the state of the field, and offer recommendations for future study. We find the increasingly multinational and multicultural literature of the field has become more rich, nuanced, and increasingly inclusive of contingency, complexity, paradox, and the diverse theoretical perspectives that will enhance our understanding of nonprofit governance.
Abd KadirR.IdrisK.OmarZ. (2018). The role of social network, social norms and trust towards board active participation behavior in cooperative governance. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 4(2), 263–280.
2.
ÅbergC.BankewitzM.KnockaertM. (2019). Service tasks of board of directors: A literature review and research agenda in an era of new governance practices. European Management Journal, 37(5), 648–663.
3.
Andres-AlonsoP.de CruzN. M.Romero-MerinoM. E. (2006). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Empirical evidence from nongovernmental development organizations in Spain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 588–604.
4.
Andres-AlonsoP. deAzofra-PalenzuelaV.Romero-MerinoM. E. (2009). Determinants of nonprofit board size and composition: The case of Spanish foundations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 784–809.
5.
AnderssonF. O.RenzD. O. (2021). Who really governs? Nonprofit governance, stakeholder theory and the dominant coalition perspective. In Donnelly-CoxG.MeyerM.WickstromF. (Eds.), Research handbook on nonprofit governance (pp. 196–219). Edward Elgar Publishing.
6.
AnsellC.DobersteinC.HendersonH.SiddikiS.‘t HartP. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: A mixed methods approach. Policy and Society, 39(4), 570–591.
7.
AshforthB. E.RogersK. M.CorleyK. G. (2011). Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization Science, 22(5), 1144–1156.
8.
BalduckA.-L.Van RossemA.BuelensM. (2010). Identifying competencies of volunteer board members of community sports clubs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 213–235.
9.
Barroso-CastroC.Pérez-CaleroL.Vecino-GravelJ. D.Villegas-PeriñánM. d. M. (2020). The challenge of board composition: Effects of board resource variety and faultlines on the degree of a firm’s international activity. Long Range Planning, 55, Article 102047.
10.
BeckD. (2014). Learning to be, learning about: A sociocultural approach to board practice. In CornforthC.BrownW. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 103–122). Routledge.
11.
BernsteinR.BuseK.SlattenL. A. (2015). Nonprofit board performance: Board members’ understanding their roles and responsibilities. American Journal of Management, 15(1), 24–35.
12.
BielefeldW.AnderssonF. (2021). Nonprofit governance and external environments. In Donnelly-CoxG.MeyerM.WickstromF. (Eds.), Research handbook on nonprofit governance (pp. 71–97). Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
Boardsource. (2017). Leading with intent: 2017 national index of nonprofit board practices.
14.
BoutchkovaM.GonzalezA.MainB. G.SilaV. (2021). Gender diversity and the spillover effects of women on boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29, 2–21.
15.
BradshawP. (2009). A contingency approach to nonprofit governance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(1), 61–81.
16.
BradshawP.ToubianaM. (2014). The dynamics of nested governance: A systems perspective. In CornforthC.BrownW. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 231–248). Routledge.
17.
BrownW. A. (2002). Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 369–386.
18.
BrownW. A. (2007). Board development practices and competent board members: Implications for performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17, 301–317.
19.
BrownW. A. (2014). Antecedents to board member engagement and participation in deliberation and decision-making. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 84–100). Routledge.
20.
BrownW. A.GuoC. (2010). Exploring the key roles for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 536–546.
21.
BrudneyJ.NobbieP. (2001). Training policy governance in nonprofit boards of directors: The view of trainer-consultants. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12, 387–409.
22.
BrysonJ.CrosbyB.StoneM. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75, 647–663.
23.
CallenJ. L.KleinA.TinkelmanD. (2010). The contextual impact of nonprofit board composition and structure on organizational performance: Agency and resource dependence perspectives. Voluntas, 21, 101–125.
24.
ChaitR.RyanW.TaylorB. (2004). Governance as leadership. Reframing the work of nonprofit boards. John Wiley.
25.
ChenG.KanferR. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223–267.
26.
CornforthC. (2001). What makes boards effective? An examination of the relationships between board inputs, structures, processes and effectiveness in non-profit organizations. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 217–229.
27.
CornforthC. (2004). The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11–32.
28.
CornforthC. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135.
29.
CornforthC. (2014). Nonprofit governance research: The need for innovative perspectives and approaches. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
30.
CouleT. (2015). Nonprofit governance and accountability: Broadening the theoretical perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 4(1), 475–497.
31.
CroninM. A.WeingartL. R.TodorovaG. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet?Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571–612.
32.
DaftR. L.WeickK. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.
33.
DohertyA.HoyeR. (2011). Role ambiguity and volunteer board member performance in nonprofit sport organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(1), 107–128.
34.
Donnelly-CoxG.MeyerM.WijkströmF. (2021). Deepening and broadening the field: Introduction. In Donnelly-CoxG.MeyerM.WijkströmF. (Eds.), Research handbook on nonprofit governance (pp. 1–25). Edward Elgar Publishing.
35.
Du BoisC.CaersR.JegersM.De CoomanR.De GeiterS.PepermansR. (2007). The non-profit board: A concise review of the empirical literature. Zeitschrift Für Öffentliche und Gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen (Journal for Public and Nonprofit Services), 30(1), 55–64.
36.
EbrahimA. (2016). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. Chapter Four. In RenzD. O. (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (4th ed., pp. 102–123). John Wiley.
37.
EikenberryA.MirabellaR.SandbergB. (Eds.). (2019). Reframing nonprofit organizations: Democracy, inclusion, and social change. Melvin & Leigh Publishing.
38.
EngleM.BrownW. (2019). Recruit the right board: Proven processes for selecting critical competencies. American Society of Association Executives.
39.
FrancoeurC.AubéC.SponemS.FarzanehF. (2018). What do we know about what is going on inside the boardroom?Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 24(5/6), 250–264.
40.
FredetteC.BradshawP.KrauseH. (2016). From diversity to inclusion: A multimethod study of diverse governing groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1S), 28S–51S.
41.
FreiwirthJ. (2014). Community-engagement governance: Engaging stakeholders for community impact. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 183–209). Routledge.
42.
GabrielssonJ.HuseM. (2004). Context, behavior, and evolution: Challenges in research on boards and governance. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 34(2), 11–36.
43.
GazleyB.ChangW. K.BinghamL. B. (2010). Board diversity, stakeholder representation, and collaborative performance in community mediation centers. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 610–620.
44.
GillM.FlynnR. J.ReissingE. (2005). The governance self-assessment checklist: An instrument for assessing board effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 271–294.
45.
Golden-BiddleK.RaoH. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611.
46.
GreenJ. C.GriesingerD. W. (1996). Board performance and organizational effectiveness in nonprofit social services organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 381–402.
47.
GuerreroS.LapalmeM.-È.SéguinM. (2014). Board chair authentic leadership and nonexecutives’ motivation and commitment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 88–101.
48.
GuerreroS.SeguinM. (2012). Motivational drivers of non-executive directors, cooperation, and engagement in board roles. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24(1), 61–77.
49.
GuoC. (2007). When government becomes the principal philanthropist: The effects of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 458–473.
50.
GuoC.MetelskyB.BradshawP. (2014). Out of the shadows: Nonprofit governance research from democratic and critical perspectives. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 47–67). Routledge.
51.
GuoC.MussoJ. A. (2007). Representation in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: A conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 308–326.
HambrickD. C.MisangyiV. F.ParkC. A. (2015). The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 323–344.
54.
HambrickD. C.van WerderA. V.ZajacE. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19, 381–385.
55.
HarrisonY.MurrayV.CornforthC. (2013). Perceptions of board chair leadership effectiveness in nonprofit and voluntary sector organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 688–712.
56.
HarrisonY. D.MurrayV. (2015). The effect of an online self-assessment tool on nonprofit board performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1129–1151.
57.
HeemskerkK.HeemskerkE. M.WatsM. (2015). Behavioral determinants of nonprofit board performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(4), 417–430.
58.
HermanR. D.RenzD. O. (2000) Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. American Review of Public Administration. 30(2), 146–160.
59.
HermanR. D.RenzD. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704.
60.
HermanR. D.RenzD. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(4), 399–415.
61.
HillmanA. J.NicholsonG.ShropshireC. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456.
62.
HollandT. P.JacksonD. K. (1998). Strengthening board performance: Findings and lessons from demonstration projects. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 9(2), 121–134.
63.
HoughA.McGregor-LowndesM.RyanC. (2014) Board monitoring and judgement as processes of sensemaking. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 142–159). Routledge.
64.
HuseM.HoskissonR.ZattoniA.ViganoR. (2011). New perspectives on board research: Changing the research agenda. Journal of Management and Governance, 15, 5–28.
65.
HuseM.ZattoniA. (2008). Trust, firm life cycle, and actual board behavior: Evidence from “One of the Lads” in the board of three small firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 38(3), 71–97.
66.
HuybrechtsJ.VoordeckersW.D’EspallierB.LybaertN.Van GilsA. (2016). The board’s demography—Firm performance relationship revisited: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(3), 992–1007.
67.
IecovichE.Bar-MorH. (2007). Relationships between chairpersons and CEOs in nonprofit organizations. Administration in Social Work, 31, 21–40.
68.
InglisS.CleaveS. (2006). A scale to assess board member motivations in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(1), 83–101.
69.
JacksonD. K.HollandT. P. (1998). Measuring the effectiveness of nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 159–182.
70.
JeavonsT. H. (2016). Ethical nonprofit management core values and key practices. In RenzD. O. (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (4th ed., pp. 188–216). John Wiley.
71.
JegersM. (2009). “Corporate” governance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20, 143–164.
72.
JonnergårdK.StafsuddA. (2011). The making of active boards in Swedish public companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 15(1), 123–155.
73.
KaczmarekS.KiminoS.PyeA. (2012). Board task-related faultlines and firm performance: A decade of evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20, 337–351.
74.
KerwinS.DohertyA.HarmanA. (2011). It’s not conflict, it’s “differences of opinion.”Small Group Research, 42(5), 562–594.
75.
KreutzerK.JacobsC. (2011). Balancing control and coaching in CSO governance. A paradox perspective on board behavior. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 613–638.
76.
LeblancR.SchwartzM. S. (2007). The black box of board process: Gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 843–851.
77.
LichtsteinerH.LutzV. (2012). Use of self-assessment by nonprofit organization boards: The Swiss case. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 484–506.
MiddletonM. (1987). Nonprofit boards of directors: Beyond the governance function. In WoodW. W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 141–153). Yale University Press.
80.
Miller-MillesenJ. L. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory driven approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 521–547.
81.
MillesenJ. L.CarmanJ. G. (2019). Building capacity in nonprofit boards: Learning from board self-assessments. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 5(1), 74–94.
82.
MinichilliA.ZattoniA.ZonaF. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20, 55–74.
83.
MoiS.MonteduroF.GnanL. (2014). Empirical research on nonprofit boards: Main features and differences from the literature on corporate and public boards. In LucaG.HinnaA.MonteduroF. (Eds.), Mechanisms, roles and consequences of governance: Emerging issues (pp. 127–158). Emerald Group.
84.
MordauntJ.CornforthC. (2004). The role of boards in the failure and turnaround of nonprofit organizations. Public Money & Management, 24(4), 227–234.
85.
MorrisonE. W.MillikenF. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.
86.
NicholsonG.NewtonC.McGregor-LowndesM. (2012). The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 461–481.
87.
O’ReganK.OsterS. (2002). Does government funding alter nonprofit governance? Evidence from New York City nonprofit contractors. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(3), 359–379.
88.
OstrowerF. (2007). National survey of nonprofit governance. Urban Institute.
89.
OstrowerF.StoneM. M. (2006). Governance: Research trends, gaps and future prospects. In PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 612–628). Yale University Press.
90.
OstrowerF.StoneM. M. (2010). Moving governance research forward: A contingency-based framework and data application. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 901–924.
91.
PostmesT.SpearsR.CihangirS. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 918–930.
92.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
93.
PuglieseA.NicholsonG.BezemerP.-J. (2015). An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 1–25.
94.
ReidW.TurbideJ. (2012). Board/staff relationships in a growth crisis: Implications for nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 82–99.
95.
RenzD. O. (2020). Reframing governance III. Nonprofit Quarterly, 27(2), 48–54.
96.
RenzD. O.AnderssonF. O. (2014). Nonprofit governance: A review of the field. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 17–46). Routledge.
97.
SaidelJ. R. (1998). Expanding the governance construct: Functions and contributions of nonprofit advisory groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(4), 421–436.
98.
SaidelJ. R. (2002). Guide to the literature on governance: An annotated bibliography. BoardSource.
99.
SchoenbergG.CuskellyG.AuldC. (2016). The role of intragroup dynamics in nonprofit governance models: A systematic quantitative literature review. Managing Sport and Leisure, 21(1), 1–22.
100.
SleesmanD. J.ConlonD. E.McNamaraG.MilesJ. E. (2012). Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 541–532.
101.
SmallmanC.McDonaldG.MuellerJ. (2010). Governing the corporation: Structure, process and behaviour. Journal of Management & Organization, 16, 194–198.
102.
SmithS. R. (2014). Hybridity and nonprofit organizations: The research agenda. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(11), 1494–1508.
103.
SolanskyS. T.DuchonD.PlowmanD. A.MartínezP. G. (2008). On the same page: The value of paid and volunteer leaders sharing mental models in churches. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(2), 203–219.
104.
StephensonM. O.SchnitzerM. H.ArroyaveV. M. (2009). Nonprofit governance, management, and organizational learning: Exploring the implications of one “mega-gift.”American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 43–59.
105.
StoneM. M.CrosbyB. C.BrysonJ. M. (2010). Governing public-nonprofit collaborations: Understanding their complexity and the implications for research. Voluntary Sector Review, 309–334.
106.
StoneM. M.OstrowerF. (2007). Acting in the public interest? Another look at research on nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 416–438.
107.
StrykerS.BurkeP. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
108.
SuarezC. (2021). Infrastructure for a new world. Nonprofit Quarterly, 28(1), 40–49.
109.
TrostJ. K.SkerlavajM.AnzengruberJ. (2016). The ability motivation opportunity framework for team innovation: Efficacy, beliefs, proactive personalities, supportive supervision and team innovation. Economic and Business Review, 18(1), 77–101.
110.
UseemM. (2006). How well-run boards make decisions. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 130–138.
111.
Van EesH.GabrielssonJ.HuseM. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319.
112.
Van PuyveldeS. (2016). Nonprofit organization governance: A theoretical review. Voluntaristics Review, 3, 1–70.
113.
WellensL.JegersM. (2014). Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach. European Management Journal, 32, 223–243.
114.
WestphalJ. D.BednarM. K. (2005). Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms’ strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 262–298.
115.
WillemsJ.AnderssonF. O.JegersM.RenzD. O. (2017). A coalition perspective on nonprofit governance quality: Analyzing dimensions of influence in an exploratory comparative case analysis. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(4), 1422–1447.
116.
ZajacE. J.WestphalJ. D. (1998). Toward a behavioral theory of the CEO/board relationship: How research can enhance our understanding of corporate governance practices. In HambrickD. C.NadlerD. A.TushmanM. L. (Eds.), Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation (pp. 256–277). Harvard Business Press.
117.
ZimmerA.SmithS. R. (2021). Nonprofit organizations in public governance. In Donnelly-CoxG.MeyerM.WickstromF. (Eds.), Research handbook on nonprofit governance (pp. 327–351). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
