FentonS.S.A., SchaubelD.E., DesmeulesM., MorrisonH.I., MaoY., CoplestonP.Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates.Am J Kidney Dis.1997; 30: 334–42.
2.
MaiorcaR., CancariniG., ZubaniR., CameriniC., ManiliL., BrimoriG.CAPD viability: A long-term comparison with hemodialysis.Perit Dial Int.1996; 16: 276–87.
3.
GokalR., OreopoulosD.Is long term CAPD possible?Perit Dial Int.1996; 16: 553–5.
4.
NissensonA.R., PrichardS.S., ChengI., GokalR., KubotaM., MaiorcaR.Non-medical factors that impact on ESRD modality selection.Kidney Int.1993; 38(Suppl 40): S120–7.
5.
NissensonA.R., PrichardS.S., ChengI.P.S., GokalR., KubotaM., MaiorcaR.ESRD modality selection into the 21st century: The impact of non-medical factors.ASAIO J.1997; 43: 143–50.
6.
NolphK.D.Why are reported relative mortality risks for CAPD and HD so variable?Perit Dial Int.1996; 16: 15–18.
7.
BloembergenW.E., PortF.K., MaugerE.A., WolfeR.A.A comparison of mortality between patients treated with haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol.1995; 6: 177–83.
8.
ChurchillD.N., TaylorD.W., VasSI, and the Canadian CAPD Clinical Trials Group. Peritonitis in CAPD: A multi-centre randomised clinical trial comparing the y-connector disinfectant system to standard system.Perit Dial Int.1989; 9: 159–63.
9.
HolleyJ.L., BernardiniJ., PirainoB.Infecting organisms in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients on the y-set.Am J Kidney Dis.1994; 23: 569–73.
10.
Canada-U.S.A. (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes.J Am Soc Nephrol.1996; 7: 198–207.
11.
National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative.Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy.Am J Kidney Dis.1997; 30(Suppl 2): S67–136.
12.
FlessnerM.F.Peritoneal transport physiology: Insights from basic research.J Am Sac Nephrol.1991; 2: 122–35.
13.
Ho-dac-PannekeetM.M., KredietR.T.Water channels in the peritoneum.Perit Dial Int.1996; 16: 255–9.
14.
Ho-dac-PannekeetM.M., AtaseverB., StruijkD.G., KredietR.T.Analysis of ultrafiltration failure in peritoneal dialysis patients by means of a standard permeability analysis (SPA).Perit Dial Int.1997; 17: 144–50.
15.
ChurchillD.N., ThorpeK.E., NolphK.D., KeshaviahP.R., OreopoulosD.G., PageD.Increased peritoneal transport - association with decreased patient and technique survival.J Am Soc Nephrol.1998; 9: 1285–92.
16.
DaviesS.J., BryanJ., PhillipsL., RussellG.I.Longitudinal changes in peritoneal kinetics: The effects of peritoneal dialysis and peritonitis.Nephrol Dial Transplant.1996; 11: 498–506.
17.
RottembourgJ.Residual renal function and recovery of renal function in patients treated by CAPD.Kidney Int.1993; 43(Suppl 40): S106–10.
18.
ColesG.A.Have we underestimated the importance of fluid balance for the survival of PD patients?Perit Dial Int.1997; 17: 321–6.
19.
JörresA., WilliamsJ.D., TopleyN.Peritoneal dialysis solution biocompatibility: Inhibitory mechanisms and recent studies with bicarbonate buffered solutions.Perit Dial Int.1997; 17(Suppl 2): S42–5.
20.
NakayamaM., KawaguchiY., YamadaK., HasegawaT., TakazoeK., KatohN.Immunohistochemical detection of advanced glycosylation end-products in the peritoneum and its possible pathophysiological role in CAPD.Kidney Int.1997; 51: 182–6.
21.
GotloibL., ShostakA., WajsbrotV.Detrimental effects of peritoneal dialysis solutions upon in vivo and in situ exposed mesothelium.Perit Dial Int.1997; 17(Suppl 2): S13–16.
22.
ColesG., GokalR., OggC., JaniF., O'DonoghueD., CancariniG.A randomized controlled trial of a bicarbonate and bicarbonate/lactate containing dialysis fluid in CAPD.Perit Dial Int.1997; 17: 48–51.
23.
PeersE., GokalR.Icodextrin: Overview of clinical experience.Perit Dial Int.1997; 17: 22–6.
24.
RippeB., SimonsenO., WieslanderA., LandrenC.Clinical and physiological effects of a new, less toxic and less acidic fluid for peritoneal dialysis.Perit Dial Int.1997; 17: 27–34.
25.
WilkieM.E., PlantM.J., EdwardsJ., BrownC.Icodextrin 7.5% dialysate solution (glucose polymer) in patients with ultrafiltration failure: Extension of CAPD technique survival.Perit Dial Int.1997; 17: 84–7.
26.
GokalR., AlexanderS., AshS., ChenW., DanielsonA., HolmesC.Peritoneal catheter and exit site practices towards optimum peritoneal access: 1998 update.Perit Dial Int.1998; 18: 11–33.
27.
The Mupirocin Study Group. Nasal mupirocin prevents Staphylococcus aureus exit-site infections during peritoneal dialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol.1997; 11: 2403–8.
28.
ThodisE., BhaskaranS., PasadakisP., BargmanJ., VasS.I., OreopoulosD.G.Decrease in Staphylococcus aureus exit-site infections and peritonitis in CAPD patients by local application of mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site.Perit Dial Int.1998; 18: 261–70.
29.
Van BiesenW., De VogeleereP., VijtD., VanholderR., LameireN.Integrated care can improve long-term survival of ESRD patients [Abstract].Perit Dial Int.1998; 18: 138.
30.
CharytanC., SpinovitzB.S., GallerM.A comparative study of CAPD and in centre HD.Arch Intern Med.1986; 146: 1138–43.
31.
BurtonP.R., WallsJ.A selection adjusted comparison of life expectancy of patients on CAPD, haemodialysis and renal transplantation.Lancet.1987; 1: 1115–19.
32.
GokalR., JakubowskiC., KingC., HuntL., BoyleS., BaillodR.Outcome in patients on CAPD and hemodialysis: A four year analysis of a prospective multicentre study.Lancet.1987; II: 1105–9.
33.
SerkesK.D., BlaggC.R., NolphK.D., VoneshE., ShapiroF.Comparison of patients and techniques in CAPD and hemodialysis: A multi-center study.Perit Dial Int.1990; 10: 15–19.
34.
CavalliP., ViglinoG., GoiaF., CottinoR., MarianoF., GandolfoC.CAPD versus hemodialysis: 7 years experience. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1989; 5: 52–5.
35.
MaiorcaR., VoneshE.F., CavalliP.L., De VecchiA., GiangrandeA., LaGrecaG.A multicentre selection adjusted comparison of patient and technique survival on CAPD and hemodialysis.Perit Dial Int.1991; 11: 1148–57.
36.
DisneyA.P.S., for the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis, and Transplant Registry. Demography and survival of patients receiving treatment for chronic renal failure in Australia and New Zealand.Am J Kidney Dis.1995; 25: 165–75.
37.
MallickN.P., JonesE., SelwoodN.The European (European Dialysis and Transplantation Association -European Renal Association) Registry.Am J Kidney Dis.1995; 25: 176–87.
38.
LupoA., TarchiniR., CancariniG., CatizoneL., CocchiR., De VecchiA.Long term outcome in CAPD: A 10 year survey by the Italian Cooperative Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.Am J Kidney Dis.1994; 24: 826–37.
39.
TeraokaS., TomaH., NiheiH., OtaK., BabazonoT., IshikawaI.Current status of renal replacement therapy in Japan.Am J Kidney Dis.1995; 25: 151–64.
40.
HeldP.J., PortF.K., TurenneM.N., GaylinD.S., HamburgerR.T., WolfeR.A.CAPD and hemodialysis: Comparison of patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditions.Kidney Int.1994; 45: 1163–9.