Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a preferred dialysis modality in many patients and healthcare settings, as it enables patient independence, reduces hospital visits, and health costs when compared to center-based hemodialysis (HD). However, PD technique failure due to loss of residual kidney function and/or loss of peritoneal membrane function may require patients to transition to HD, where hybrid dialysis (combining PD and HD) may be a viable alternative to thrice-weekly HD, while also promoting patient-centered care. However, hybrid dialysis is not advocated in current clinical practice guidelines, potentially due to a lack of clinician experience or high certainty evidence on the benefits, safety, and cost of combining PD and HD. In this narrative review, we summarize the existing data on health and economic outcomes in patients transitioning from PD alone to combined PD and HD, which may inform patient selection, dialysis prescription, and evaluation of dialysis quality for clinicians and patients considering hybrid dialysis.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
