Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the classic school choice market model, school districts are conceived as exerting competitive pressure on each other by improving conditions in the schools and programs within their boundaries. In this article, we examine an invasive action where a school district increased student enrollment by actively bussing students from within another district’s boundaries (bussing district), an invasive action that deviates from the classic school choice market model. In our focused analysis of three Phoenix elementary districts using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the bussing district realized a “bump” of 44.7 students on average per school, after controlling for distance and school quality, via transporting students directly from within its neighbor district’s boundaries. The findings may portend more aggressive actions that mirror the market behaviors of charter schools as districts face declining student enrollment counts due to the proliferation of market reforms that increase competition.

Keywords

market-based reforms school choice school district administration finance geographic information systems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arizona Revised Statutes § 15‑816.01. (2025). Open enrollment policies; preference; selection process; transportation; reporting requirements; public awareness effort.

Arizona Revised Statutes, § 15‑901. (2025). Definitions.

Arizona School Boards Association. (2025). Become a school board member. https://azsba.org/services-resources/become-school-board-member/

Armor

D. J.

Peiser

B. M.

(1997). Competition in education: Interdistrict choice in Massachusetts. Harvard University.

Arsen

Plank

D. N.

Sykes

(2002). School Choice Policies: How have they affected Michigan’s education system? (Working Paper No. 10). The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.

Arsen

Plank

Sykes

(1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. http://edtech.connect.msu.edu/choice/conference/default.asp.

Bell

(2009). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493–521.

Bell

C. A.

(2007). Space and place: Urban parents’ geographical preferences for schools. Urban Review, 39(4), 375–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0059-5

Brunner

E. J.

Cho

S. W.

Reback

(2012). Mobility, housing markets, and schools: Estimating the effects of inter-district choice programs. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7–8), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.04.002

10.

Burgess

Greaves

Vignoles

Wilson

(2015). What parents want: School preferences and school choice. Economic Journal, 125(587), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12153

11.

Carlson

Lavery

Witte

J. F.

(2011). The determinants of interdistrict open enrollment flows: Evidence from two states. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710388643

12.

Carpenter

D. M.

(2014). School choice signals: Research review and survey Experiments. The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.

13.

Chubb

J. E.

Moe

T. M.

(1990). Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. The Brookings Institution.

14.

Cobb

C. D.

(2020). Geospatial analysis: A new window into educational equity, access, and opportunity. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 97–129. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907362

15.

Cobb

C. D.

Glass

G. V.

(1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1).

16.

Cowen

J. M.

Creed

Keesler

V. A.

(2015). Dynamic participation in inter-disrict open enrollment: Evidence from Michigan 2005-2013 (Working Paper No. 49). The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.

17.

Dimond

P. R.

(2005). Beyond busing: Reflections on urban segregation, the courts, and equal opportunity. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.168455

18.

Education Commission of the States. (2022a). 50-state comparison: Open enrollment policies. Retrieved May 13, 2024, from https://www.ecs.org/50-state-comparison-open-enrollment-policies/

19.

Education Commission of the States. (2022b). Open enrollment policies 2022: Who is responsible for student transportation? Retrieved February 23, 2024 from https://reports.ecs.org/comparisons/open-enrollment-policies-2022-07

20.

Fowler

(2014). Participation in Ohio’s interdistrict open enrollment option: Exploring the supply-side of choice. Educational Policy, 10(4), 518–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904896010004006

21.

Ghosh

(2010). Strategic interaction among public school districts: Evidence on spatial interdependence in school inputs. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.001

22.

Gill

B. P.

Timpane

P. M.

Ross

K. E.

Brewer

D. J.

Booker

(2001). Rhetoric versus reality : What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Rand Education. Retrieved February 28, 2024 from https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1118-1.html

23.

Glazerman

Dotter

(2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717702964

24.

Google Maps. (n.d.). Distance matrix API request and response. Retrieved May 9, 2024, from https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/distance-matrix/distance-matrix#TextValueObject

25.

Green

T. L.

Sánchez

Germain

(2017). Communities and school ratings: Examining geography of opportunity in an urban school district located in a resource-rich city. Urban Review, 49(5), 777–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0421-1

26.

Gulosino

d’Entremont

(2011). Circles of influence: An analysis of charter school location and racial patterns at varying geographic scales. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v19n8.2011

27.

Gulosino

Lubienski

(2011). School’s strategic responses to competition in segregated urban areas: Patterns in school locations in metropolitan Detroit. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/829

28.

Hamlin

Cheng

(2020). Parental empowerment, involvement, and satisfaction: A comparison of choosers of charter, Catholic, Christian, and district-run public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 641–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19888013

29.

Hastings

J. S.

Kane

T. J.

Staiger

D. O.

(2006). Parental Preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program (Working Paper No. 11805). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11805

30.

Hayes

(2022, December 31). Gentlemen’s agreement: History and examples, limitations. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gentlemansagreement.asp

31.

Hogrebe

M. C.

Tate

W. F.

(2012). Geospatial perspective: Toward a visual political literacy project in education, health, and human services. Review of Research in Education, 36(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X11422861

32.

Holme

J. J.

Richards

M. P.

(2009). School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560902810120

33.

Hoxby

C. M.

(2003). School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In Hoxby

C. M.

(Ed.), The Economics of School Choice (p. 352). University of Chicago Press.

34.

Jabbar

(2015). “Every kid is money”: Market-like competition and school leader strategies in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 638–659. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715577447

35.

Jimerson

(2002). Interdistrict open enrollment: The benign choice? The clearing house: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 76(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650209604940

36.

Jochim

Dearmond

Gross

Lake

(2014). Making school choice work series: How parents experience public school choice. https://crpe.org/wp-content/uploads/crpe_how-parents-experience-public-school-choice_1_1.pdf

37.

Ladner

Brouillette

M. J.

(2000). The impact of limited school choice on public school districts: Case studies of how school districts in Michigan’s largest county are responding to competition from charter schools and public “schools of choice.” www.mackinac.org

38.

Lafleur

J. C.

(2016). Locating Chicago’s charter schools: A socio-spatial analysis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(4), 33. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v24.1745

39.

Lavery

Carlson

(2015). Dynamic participation in interdistrict open enrollment. Educational Policy, 29(5), 746–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813518103

40.

Lenhoff

S. W.

(2020). Unregulated open enrollment and inequitable access to schools of choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(3), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1776072

41.

Lincove

J. A.

Cowen

J. M.

Imbrogno

J. P.

(2018). What’s in your Portfolio? How parents rank traditional public, private, and charter schools in post-katrina New Orleans’ citywide system of school choice. Education Finance and Policy, 13(2), 194–226. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00222

42.

Lubienski

(2005). School choice as a civil right: District responses to competition and equal educational opportunity. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(4), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680500299809

43.

Lubienski

(2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124507303994

44.

Lubienski

Gulosino

Weitzel

(2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647. https://doi.org/10.1086/599778

45.

Lubienski

Lee

(2017). Geo-spatial analyses in education research: The critical challenge and methodological possibilities. Geographical Research, 55(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12188

46.

McShane

M. Q.

Shaw

(2020). Transporting school choice students: A primer on states’ transportation policies related to private, charter, and open enrollment students. https://www.edchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Transporting-School-Choice-Students-by-Michael-Q-McShane-and-Michael-Shaw.pdf

47.

Mikulecky

M. T.

(2013). Open enrollment is on the menu-but you can order it? www.ecs.org

48.

Minnesota Department of Administration. (2013). A legislative study of student transportation. Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://mn.gov/admin/assets/Study_Student_Transportation_tcm36-209188.pdf

49.

Minnesota Department of Education. (2021). Transportation of public school enrollment options students. Retrieved February 27, 2024, from https://education.mn.gov/mdeprod/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dDocName=002375&RevisionSelectionMethod=latestReleased&Rendition=primary

50.

Orfield

(1978). Must we bus? Segregation and national policy (1st ed.). Brookings Institute.

51.

Parrish

(2023, December 13). Facing sudden enrollment drop, phoenix union launches marketing campaign. AZCentral. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2023/12/13/how-phoenix-union-hopes-to-halt-enrollment-drop-with-covid-funds/71842899007/

52.

Pogodzinski

Lenhoff

S. W.

Addonizio

M. F.

(2018). The push and pull of open enrolment policy in metro Detroit. Educational Review, 70(5), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1359148

53.

Powers

J. M.

Topper

A. M.

Potterton

A. U.

(2018). Interdistrict mobility and charter schools in Arizona: Understanding the dynamics of public school choice. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, 25(3), 62–93.

54.

Powers

J. M.

Topper

A. M.

Silver

(2012). Public school choice and student mobility in metropolitan phoenix. Journal of School Choice, 6(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2012.673862

55.

Reback

(2008). Demand (and supply) in an inter-district public school choice program. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.001

56.

Reese

(2011, November 7). Gilbert school board member up for marketing job in Mesa district. Mesa Tribune. https://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/education/gilbert-school-board-member-up-for-marketing-job-in-mesa-district/article_bc39c49a-098c-11e1-b55c-001cc4c002e0.html

57.

Reese

(2013, September 24). Tempe union buses pick up kids outside district. East Valley Tribune. https://www.eastvalleytribune.com/news/tempe-union-buses-pick-up-kids-outside-district/article_0d45846b-36d3-5321-9ee9-263ba4d2582b.html

58.

Rincke

(2006). Competition in the public school sector: Evidence on strategic interaction among US school districts. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.12.003

59.

Rothbart

M. W.

(2020). The impact of school choice on public school budgets: Evidence from open enrollment in New York City. Public Budgeting and Finance, 40(4), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12267

60.

Ruijs

Oosterbeek

(2019). School choice in Amsterdam: Which schools are chosen when school choice is free? Education Finance and Policy, 14(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00237

61.

Safier

(2019, June 26). Did I underestimate the impact of open enrollment in my last post? Tucson Weekly. https://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2019/06/26/did-i-underestimate-the-impact-of-open-enrollment-in-my-last-post

62.

Sampson

Garcia

D. R.

Hom

M. O.

Bertrand

(2022). Open enrollment and disrupting the political ecology of U.S. public education. Peabody Journal of Education, 97(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2022.2026721

63.

Saporito

Sohoni

(2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79(April), 81–105.

64.

Saultz

Fitzpatrick

Jacobsen

(2015). Exploring the supply side: Factors related to charter school openings in NYC. Journal of School Choice, 9(3), 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2015.1028829

65.

Saultz

Yaluma

C. B.

(2017). Equal Access? Analyzing charter location relative to demographics in Ohio. Journal of School Choice, 11(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1345239

66.

Schneider

Schiller

K. S.

Coleman

J. S.

(1996). Public school choice: Some evidence from the national education longitudinal Study of 1988. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373701800101

67.

Siegel-Hawley

(2013). Educational gerrymandering? Race and attendance boundaries in a demographically changing suburb. Harvard Educational Review, 83(4), 580–612. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.4.k385375245677131

68.

Singleton

A. D.

Longley

P. A.

Allen

O’Brien

(2011). Estimating secondary school catchment areas and the spatial equity of access. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.09.006

69.

Teske

Fitzpatrick

O’brien

(2009). Drivers of choice: Parents, transportation, and school choice. www.crpe.org

70.

Tiebout

(1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.

71.

Trajkovski

Zabel

Schwartz

A. E.

(2021). Do school buses make school choice work? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 86, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103607

72.

Urban Institute Student Transportation Working Group. (2017). Student transportation and educational access. https://www.urban.org/student-transportation-and-educational-access

73.

Weiss

J. A.

(1998). Policy theories of school choice. Social Science Quarterly, 79(3), 523–532.

74.

Welsch

D. M.

Statz

Skidmore

(2010). An examination of inter-district public school transfers in Wisconsin. Economics of Education Review, 29(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.008

75.

Wilson

E. J.

Marshall

Wilson

Krizek

K. J.

(2010). By foot, bus or car: Children’s school travel and school choice policy. Environment and Planning A, 42(9), 2168–2185. https://doi.org/10.1068/a435

76.

Wixom

Kelly

(2018). 50-State comparison: Open enrollment policies (2018 Update). https://www.ecs.org/open-enrollment-policies/

77.

Wohlstetter

Nayfack

M. B.

Mora-Flores

(2008). Charter schools and “Customer” satisfaction: Lessons from field testing a parent survey. Journal of School Choice, 2(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582150802007424

School Districts as Invasive Actors in a Market School Choice Environment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References