Early Adopters: Private School Leaders Respond to the Introduction of Targeted School Vouchers

Abstract

The North Carolina Opportunity Scholarship Program awarded private school vouchers to over 7,000 low-income students in 2017-18, yet only 61% of the state’s private schools registered to participate in the Opportunity Scholarship Program and just over half of schools (54%) actually enrolled voucher recipients. Given that the program is anticipated to grow by $10 million per year for 10 years, private school supply will be an important consideration as student participation rises. Using rich focus group and survey data collected from private school leaders between 2014 and 2017, this analysis probes the participation decisions of private school leaders.

Keywords

school supply private school choice market-based reforms vouchers tax-credit scholarships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antoszyk

. (2016). Opportunity scholarships and school choice. EducationNC. Retrieved from https://www.ednc.org/map/2016/08/opportunity-scholarships/

Austin

. (2015). Schools’ responses to voucher policy: Participation decisions and early implementation experiences in the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program. Journal of School Choice, 9(3), 354–379.doi:10.1080/15582159.2015.1061384

Austin

. (2019). Organizational and social costs of schools’ participation in a voucher program. In Berends

Waddington

R. J.

Schoenig

(Eds.), School choice at the crossroads research perspectives (pp. 30–51). New York City, NY: Routledge.

Bush v. Holmes , 919 So.2d 392 (2006).

Catterall

J. S

. (1992). Theory and practice of family choice in education: Taking stock — review essay. Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 407–416.doi:10.1016/0272-7757(92)90045-5

EdChoice . (2019). The ABCs of school choice. Indianapolis, IN: EdChoice.

Egalite

A. J

. (2014). Effects of choice program design. In McShane

(Ed.), School Choice: Encouraging New and Better Schools (pp. 163–183). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Egalite

A. J.

Gray

Stallings

D. T

. (2017). Parent perspectives: Applicants to North Carolina’s Opportunity Scholarship Program share their experiences. OS Evaluation Report No. 2. Retrieved from https://ced.ncsu.edu/elphd/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/07/Parent-Perspectives.pdf

Fleming

D. J

. (2015). The Religious and Secular Supply of Schools in Choice Programs. In McShane

M. Q.

(Ed.), The supply side of school choice (pp. 185–208). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

10.

Friedman

. (1955). The role of government in education. In Solo

R. A.

(Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 123–144). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

11.

Fusarelli

L. D

. (2002). Tightly coupled policy in loosely coupled systems: Institutional capacity and organizational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 561–575.doi:10.1108/09578230210446045

12.

Gershenson

. (2018). Grade inflation in high schools (2005–2016). Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http://edex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/(2018.09.19)%20Grade%20Inflation%20in%20High%20Schools%20(2005-2016).pdf.

13.

Glenn

. (2011). Contrasting models of state and school: a comparative historical study of parental choice and state control. New York and London: Continuum.

14.

Harris

D. N.

Herrington

C. D.

Albee

. (2007). The future of vouchers: Lessons from the adoption, design, and court challenges of Florida’s three voucher programs. Educational Policy, 21(1), 215–244.

15.

Harris

D. N.

Larsen

M. F

. (2015). What schools do families want (and why)? School demand and information before and after the New Orleans post-Katrina school reforms. New Orleans, LA: Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. Retrieved from http://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/Technical-Report-Final-Combined.pdf.

16.

Hayek

F. A

. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

17.

Henderson

M. B.

Houston

Peterson

P. E.

West

M. W

. (2020). Public support grows for higher teacher pay and expanded school choice: Results from the 2019 education next poll. Education Next, 20(1).

18.

Kisida

Wolf

P. J.

Rhinesmith

. (2015). Views from private schools: Attitudes about school choice programs in three states. Washington D.C.: The American Enterprise Institute.

19.

McDonald

Schultz

. (2018). United States Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools 2017-2018. Arlington, VA: National Catholic Educational Association.

20.

McShane

M. Q.

. (Ed.). (2014). New and better schools: The supply side of school choice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

21.

North Carolina State Education Assistance Authority . (2018). Opportunity scholarship program. Retrieved from http://www.ncseaa.edu/documents/OPS_Summary_Data.pdf

22.

Ridley

Terrier

. (2018). Fiscal and education spillovers from charter school expansion (SEII Discussion Paper No. 2018.02). Cambridge, MA: School Effectiveness & Inequality Initiative at MIT. Retrieved from https://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2018.02-Ridley-Terrier.pdf.

23.

Schumpeter

. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York City, NY: Harper and Brothers.

24.

Stewart

Jacob

A. M.

Jensen

. (2012). School site visits: What can we learn from choice schools in Milwaukee? (SCDP Milwaukee Evaluation Report 34). Fayetteville, AR: School Choice Demonstration Project.

25.

Stuit

Doan

. (2013). School choice regulations: Red tape or red herring? Washington D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

26.

Sude

DeAngelis

C. A.

Wolf

P. J

. (2018). Supplying choice: An analysis of school participation decisions in voucher programs in Washington, DC, Indiana, and Louisiana. Journal of School Choice, 12(1), 8–33.doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1345232

27.

Tye

. (2000). Hard truths: Uncovering the deep structure of schooling. New York City, NY: Teachers College Press.