Ideological clarity has been defined as a catalyst for more equitable educational practice. However, in the absence of concrete analytic tools, research on ideological clarity has not adequately accounted for why some educators find space to take corresponding sociopolitical action where others do not. In this exploratory qualitative study, I examined the role of ideological clarity in educators’ sensemaking of English language development (ELD) policy. Informed by interviews with 26 ELD educators, I propose a framework and demonstrate its utility for understanding the role of ideological clarity in (en)countering the theoretical and ideological complexities of policies aimed at educational equity.
AlfaroC.QuezadaR. L. (2010). International teacher professional development: Teacher reflections of authentic teaching and learning experiences. Teaching Education, 21(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210903466943
2.
BartoloméL. I. (2004). Critical pedagogy and teacher education: Radicalizing prospective teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(1), 97–122.
3.
BartoloméL. I.BalderramaM. V. (2001). The need for educators with political and ideological clarity: Providing our children with “the best”. In ReyesM. D. L. L.HalcónJ. J. (Eds.), The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students (pp. 48–64). Teachers College Press.
4.
BhansariR. S. (2024). “I’ve become what I’m trying to fight. . .”: Classroom language policy navigation and embodied critical consciousness. Language Policy, 23(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-023-09660-9
5.
BlevinsB.MagillK.SalinasC. (2020). Critical historical inquiry: The intersection of ideological clarity and pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.09.003
6.
Bonacina-PughF. (2020). Legitimizing multilingual practices in the classroom: The role of the ‘practiced language policy’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1372359
7.
Bridwell-MitchellE. N. (2015). Theorizing teacher agency and reform: How institutionalized instructional practices change and persist. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715575559
8.
Bridwell-MitchellE. N. (2018). Too Legit to quit: Institutional perspectives on the study of schools as organizations. In ConnollyM.Eddy-SpicerD. H.JamesC.KruseS. D. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of school organization (1st ed.) (pp. 139–155). Sage Inc.
9.
CabralB. (2023). Linguistic confinement: Rethinking the racialized interplay between educational language learning and carcerality. Race Ethnicity and Education, 26, 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2022.2069742
10.
California Department of Education. (n.d). Multilingual learners [Government]. California Department of Education. https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/ml/
11.
Cervantes-SoonC. G.DornerL.PalmerD.HeimanD.SchwerdtfegerR.ChoiJ. (2017). Combating inequalities in Two-Way language immersion programs: Toward Critical Consciousness in bilingual education spaces. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x17690120
12.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.
13.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
14.
EstradaP. (2022). Classroom composition policy for elementary students labeled English Learner: The best of intentions gone away and rectification. Educational Forum, 86(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2022.1997522
15.
FlushmanT.HeggS.GuiseM.SanfordJ.StauchN. (2024). Negotiations and reconciliations in the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104744
16.
GerringJ. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994.
17.
GoodwinC. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
GutiérrezR. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In Herbel-EisenmannB.ChoppinJ.WagnerD.PimmD. (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies. (pp. 17–33). Springer.
20.
HernandezS. J. (2017). Are they all language learners?: Educational labeling and raciolinguistic identifying in a California Middle School Dual Language Program. The CATESOL Journal, 29(1), 133–154.
21.
HillL.BettsJ.HopkinsM.LavadenzM.BachoferK.HayesJ.LeeA.MurilloM. A.VahdaniT.ZauA. C. (2019). Academic progress for English learners: The role of school language environment and course placement in grades 6-12. Public Policy Institute of California.
22.
HillL.LeeA.HayesJ. (2021). Surveying the landscape of California’s English learner reclassification policy. Public Policy Institute of California.
23.
HopkinsM. (2016). Beliefs in context: Understanding language policy implementation at a systems level. Educational Policy, 30(4), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814550073
24.
HopkinsM.WeddleH.LavadenzM.MurilloM. A.VahdaniT. (2022). Examining the English learner policy ecology: How educators navigated the provision of designated English language development (ELD) support at the secondary level. Peabody Journal of Education, 97(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2022.2026719
25.
HornbergerN. H. (2005). Opening and filling up implementation and ideological spaces in heritage language education. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 605–609.
26.
HornbergerN. H.JohnsonD. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.
27.
KatznelsonN.BernsteinK. A. (2017). Rebranding bilingualism: The shifting discourses of language education policy in California’s 2016 election. Linguistics and Education, 40, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.05.002
28.
KeislerL.Ordoñez-JasisR.MejiaM. (2024). Subversive thinking toward liberatory literacy leadership: Centering the voices of critical teachers of color. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2298208
29.
KohliR. (2019). Lessons for teacher education: The role of critical professional development in teacher of color retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118767645
30.
LarriveeB. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207451
31.
LevittH. M. (2021). Essentials of critical-constructivist grounded theory research. American Psychological Association.
32.
MavrogordatoM.WhiteR. S. (2020). Leveraging policy implementation for social justice: How school leaders shape educational opportunity when implementing policy for English learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x18821364
33.
NaL.GregoryJ. C.TéllezK. (2021). English language standards in California, China and Mexico: History, comparison, and analysis. Interchange, 52(4), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09432-6
34.
PhilipT. M. (2012). Desegregation, the attack on public education, and the inadvertent critiques of social justice educators: Implications for teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(2), 29–41.
35.
RanschaertR. (2023). When shutting the door won’t do: Teaching with the specter of community backlash and the implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231180831
36.
RavitchS. M.CarlN. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Sage.
37.
RizviF.LingardB. (2011). Social equity and the assemblage of values in Australian higher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2010.549459
38.
RosaJ. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12116
39.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publishing.
40.
SantibañezL.UmanskyI. M. (2018). English learners: Charting their experiences and mapping their futures in California schools. (Getting Down to Facts II) [Research Brief]. Policy Analysis for California Education.
41.
ValdésG. (2018). Analyzing the curricularization of language in two-way immersion education: Restating two cautionary notes. Bilingual Research Journal, 41(4), 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2018.1539886
42.
ValdésG. (2020). (Mis)educating the children of Mexican-origin people in the United States: The challenge of internal language borders. Intercultural Education, 31(5), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2020.1794122
43.
Venegas-WeberP.NegretteG. M. (2023). From ideological clarity to linguistic ideological clarity: Critical reflections, examination of language ideologies & interrogation of pedagogical practices. Linguistics and Education, 77, 101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101201
44.
WatsonW. (2017). Educating in a ‘regressive era’: Exploring the race-full ideological standpoint of Black Women Teachers. Urban Review, 49(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0398-9
45.
WattsR. J.Hipolito-DelgadoC. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation?: Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. Urban Review, 47(5), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0341-x
46.
ZeichnerK.BowmanM.GuillenL.NapolitanK. (2016). Engaging and working in solidarity with local communities in preparing the teachers of their children. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660623
