The Seal of Biliteracy (SoBL) is a language education policy adopted by states to recognize students’ biliteracy. Originally implemented in high schools to recognize graduating seniors, the initiative also includes pathway awards, which can be implemented in earlier grades to promote lengthier language study and increase biliteracy attainment. This qualitative case study investigates the K-12 implementation of SoBL and pathway recognitions in the urban-intensive context of the Chicago Public Schools. Drawing from documentation and interviews with district- and school-level stakeholders, this research uncovers the nuanced policy work to promote, assess, and recognize biliteracy in a district with 322,000 students.
AnyaU. (2020). African Americans in world language study: The forged path and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190520000070
BaggettH. C. (2016). Student enrollment in world languages: L’Égalité des chances?Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12173
4.
BauerE. B.ColomerS. E.WiemeltJ. (2020). Biliteracy of African American and Latinx kindergarten students in a dual-language program: Understanding students’ translanguaging practices across informal assessments. Urban Education, 55(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918789743
5.
BorowczykM. (2019). Credentialing heritage: The role of community language schools in implementing the Seal of Biliteracy. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12439
6.
BurnetM. M. (2020). Signed, sealed, delivered: District-level adoption of the Washington state Seal of Biliteracy. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 105–122). Information Age.
7.
CastroA. (2020). Validating the linguistic strengths of English learners: Los Angeles Unified School District’s implementation of the Seal of Biliteracy. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 123–140). Information Age.
8.
CollierV. P.ThomasW. P. (2004). The astounding effectiveness of dual language education for all. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–20. Retrived from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d854ac170e64a71d1de71d3/t/5d9cb8927d796c384c56656d/1570551960353/2004-winter_njrp_astounding-effectiveness-of-dl.pdf.
9.
ColomerS. E.Chang-BaconC. K. (2020). Seal of Biliteracy graduates get critical: Incorporating critical biliteracies in dual-language programs and beyond. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1017
10.
DavinK. J. (2021). Critical language testing: Factors influencing students’ decisions to (not) pursue the Seal of Biliteracy. Harvard Educational Review, 91(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-91.2.179
11.
DavinK. J.HeinekeA. J. (2017). The Seal of Biliteracy: Variations in policy and outcomes. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12279
12.
DavinK. J.HeinekeA. J. (2018). The Seal of Biliteracy: Adding students’ voices to the conversation. Bilingual Research Journal, 41(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2018.1481896.
13.
DavinK. J.HeinekeA. J.HancockC. (2022). The Seal of Biliteracy: A retrospective. Foreign Language Annals, 55(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12596
14.
deJongE. J. (2008). Contextualizing policy appropriation: Teachers’ perspectives, local responses, and English-only ballot initiatives. Urban Review, 40(4), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0085-y
15.
DeLeonT. M.LavandezM. (2020). The new ecology of biliteracy in California: A study of the early implementation of the Seal of Biliteracy. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 49–66). Information Age.
16.
DiemS.SampsonC. (2023). Goals, rhetoric, and (in)equity: The rationale behind decentralizing a large, diverse school district. Urban Education, 58(2), 191–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920908915
17.
DornerL. M.MoonJ.BonneyE. N.OtisA. (2021). Dueling discourses in dual language schools: Multilingual ‘success for all’ versus the academic decline of Black students. In FloresN.TsengA.SubtireluN. (Eds.), Bilingualism for all? Raciolinguistic perspectives on dual language education in the United States (pp. 88–110). Multilingual Matters.
18.
ElfersA. M.StritikusT. T. (2013). How school and district leaders support classroom teachers’ work with English language learners. Education Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 305–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13492797
19.
EricksonF. (1987). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed, pp. 119–161). MacMillan.
FiskJ. K. (2020). School-level implementation of the Seal of Biliteracy: One linguistically diverse suburban Illinois high school’s journey. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 141–160). Information Age.
22.
FloresN.TsengA.SubtireluN. (2021). Bilingualism for all or just for the rich and White? Introducing a raciolinguistic perspective to dual language education. In FloresN.TsengA.SubtireluN. (Eds.), Bilingualism for all? Raciolinguistic perspectives on dual language education in the United States (pp. 1–18). Multilingual Matters.
23.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A. (2018). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English learners. Teachers College Press.
24.
HeinekeA. J. (2016). Restrictive language policy in practice: English learners in Arizona. Multilingual Matters.
25.
HeinekeA. J.DavinK. D. (2021). Implementing the Seal of Biliteracy: A multiple case study of six high-awarding districts. Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.111/modl.12708
26.
HernandezS. J. (2021). Centering raciolinguistic ideologies in two-way dual language education: The politicized role of parents in mediating their children’s bilingualism. In FloresN.TsengA.SubtireluN. (Eds.), Bilingualism for all? Raciolinguistic perspectives on dual language education in the United States (pp. 111–131). Multilingual Matters.
27.
HikidaM.TaylorL. A. (2023). As the test collapses in”: Teaching and learning amid high-stakes testing in two urban elementary classrooms. Urban Educaton, 58(6), 1032–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920902263
28.
HonigM. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1–24). SUNY Press.
Illinois State Seal of Biliteracy, § 23.680.20, 44 Ill. Reg. 9976 (2013).
34.
JansaT.BrezichaK. (2017). The Georgia Seal of Biliteracy: Exploring the nexus of politics and language education. Dimension, 45(1), 32–48. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://www.scolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2_Georgia-Seal-Biliteracy_Jansa_2.pdf.
35.
JohnsonD. C. (2013). Language policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
JohnsonD. C.FreemanR. (2010). Appropriating language policy on the local level: Working the spaces for bilingual education. In MenkenK.GarcíaO. (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 13–31). Routledge.
37.
LevinsonB. A.WinsteadT.SuttonM. (2020). An anthropological approach to education policy as a practice of power: Concepts and methods. In FanG.PopkewitzT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy studies (Vol. 1, pp. 363–380). Springer Open.
38.
LuX.TroyanF. (2021). Diversity and inclusion of culturally and linguistically diverse students in K-12 Chinese language education. Foreign Language Annals, 55(3), 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12639
39.
MarichalN.Rosario RoldánA.CoadyM. (2021). My language learners seemed like ghosts”: A rural teacher’s transformational journey implementing the Seal of Biliteracy. Rural Educator, 42(1), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v42i1.1180
40.
McCartyT. (2011). Ethnography and language policy. Routledge.
41.
MehtaJ. (2013). The allure of order: High hopes, dashed expectations, and the troubled quest to remake American schooling. Oxford.
42.
MilnerH. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
MuroJ. A. (2021). Helping or being helped? The influence of raciolinguistic ideologies on parental involvement in dual immersion. In FloresN.TsengA.SubtireluN. (Eds.), Bilingualism for all? Raciolinguistic perspectives on dual language education in the United States (pp. 132–155). Multilingual Matters.
45.
OkraskiC. V.HancockC. R.DavinK. J. (2020). An innovative approach to the Seal of Biliteracy in Minnesota. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 67–84). Information Age.
46.
OlsenL. (2020). The history of the movement: Enacting the State Seal of Biliteracy in the state of California. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 17–32). Information Age.
47.
PortzJ. (2021). Next-generation” accountability? Evidence from three school districts. Urban Education, 56(8), 1297–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917741727
48.
PufahlI.RhodesN. C. (2011). Foreign language instruction in US schools: Results of a national survey of elementary and secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 258–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01130.x
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford.
51.
SalavartR.SzalkiewiczmD. (2020). The Seal of Biliteracy, graduates with global competence, is on the rise. NECTFL Review, 85(1), 29–49. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1251339.pdf.
52.
SchoenerH.McKenzieK. (2016). Equity traps redux: Inequitable access to foreign language courses for African American high school students. Equity and Excellence in Education, 49(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1194099
53.
SchwedhelmM. C.KingK. A. (2019). The neoliberal logic of the state Seals of Biliteracy. Foreign Language Annals, 2020, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12438
SherfN. L.HardyP. R.SolórzanoH. (2020). A collaborative model for Seal of Biliteracy implementation in the Massachusetts pilot program. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 85–104). Information Age.
56.
ShohamyE. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
57.
SpillaneJ. P.ReiserB. J.GómezL. M. (2006). Policy implementation and cognition: The role of human, social, and distributed cognition in framing policy implementation. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 47–64). SUNY Press.
58.
SpolskyB. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge.
59.
SubtireluN. (2020). Raciolinguistic ideology, the Seal of the Biliteracy, and the politics of language education. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 161–176). Information Age.
60.
SubtireluN. C.BorowczykM.Thorson HernándezR.VeneziaF. (2019). Recognizing whose bilingualism? A critical policy analysis of the Seal of Biliteracy. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12556
61.
ValdésG. (1997). Dual-language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 67(3), 391–429. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.3.n5q175qp86120948
62.
ValdésG. (2020). The future of the Seal of Biliteracy: Issues of equity and inclusion. In HeinekeA. J.DavinK. J. (Eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation (pp. 177–204). Information Age.
63.
WileyT. G. (2014). Diversity, super-diversity, and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance?Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 24–55. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X13511047
64.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed). Sage.
65.
ZhengB. (2020). Neoliberal multilingualism and “humanitarian connections”: Discourses around parents’ experiences with a Mandarin Chinese immersion school. Language and Education, 35(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1828451
