Hispanic-Serving Institutions’ (HSIs) diversification and Title V’s anemic funding present a ripe condition for inequity. Hence, I interviewed 29 institutional actors across 17 HSIs to understand how they view their competitiveness for these grants and sources of inequity of this program. I identified four themes, demonstrating that an HSI’s institutional capacity, (in)actions, knowledge, and leadership inform its competitiveness for Title V funding. The findings show that HSIs have unequal organizational conditions and reveal ways this program may (re)produce inequity among HSIs. Without increased Title V appropriations and policy modification, HSIs will vie for funding on increasingly unequal terms, resulting in greater inequity.
AlvaradoL. A. (2010). Dispelling the meritocracy myth: Lessons for higher education and student affairs educators. The Vermont Connection, 31, 2. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/tvc/vol31/iss1/2
Aguilar-SmithS. (2021a). Seeking to serve or $erve? Hispanic-serving institutions’ race-evasive pursuit of racialized funding. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211057097
4.
Aguilar-SmithS. (2021b). Sources of inequity in the Title V Program: A critical qualitative study of institutional agents’ understanding of Hispanic-serving institutions’ grant-seeking competitiveness (Publication No. 28493073) [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
5.
Aguilar-SmithS.YunJ. (2022). Toward ensuring the equitable allocation of federal funding: An analysis of Hispanic-serving institutions’ pursuit and receipt of Title V grants [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Counseling and higher education, DepartmentUniversity of North tEcas.
6.
BarkerC. (2002). Making sense of cultural studies: Central problems and critical debates. Sage Publications.
7.
BloomL. R.SawinP. (2009). Ethical responsibilities in feminist research: Challenging ourselves to do activist research with women in poverty. International Studies of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902835413
8.
BridgesK. (2018). Critical race theory: A primer (1st ed.) Foundation Press.
CastilloJ. M. (2019). The gap between matriculation and persistence: Title V of the Higher Education Act at rural four-year institutions (Publication No. 13883601) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
12.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.) (1995). Critical race theory: The key writing that formed the movement. The News Press.
EckelP. D.KezarA. (2016). The intersecting authority of boards, presidents, and faculty: Toward shared leadership. In BastedoM. N.AltbachP. G.GumportP. J. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economics challenges (pp. 155–187). https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/463
FelixE. R.TrinidadA. (2020). The decentralization of race: Tracing the dilution of racial equity in educational policy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1681538
21.
GarciaG. A. (2019). Becoming Hispanic-serving institutions: Opportunities for colleges and universities. Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
GriffinK. A.HurtadoS. (2011). Institutional variety in American higher education. In HarperS. R.KomivesS. R.SchuhJ. H.JonesS. R. (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (5th ed., pp. 24–42). Jossey-Bass.
KezarA.DizonJ. P. M.ScottD. (2020). Senior leadership teams in higher education: What we know and what we need to know. Innovative Higher Education, 45(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09491-9
28.
KillgoreL. (2009). Merit and competition in selective college admissions. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0083
29.
LacagninoS. (2019). The effect of participation in a Title V Program on Latinx student success at a community college (Publication No. 13880633) [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
LiuA. (2011). Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education. Higher Education, 62(4), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9394-7
Martínez-AlemánA. M.PusserB.BensimónE. M. (2015). Introduction. In Martínez-AlemánA. M.PusserB.BensimónE. M. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education: A practical introduction (pp. 1–6). John Hopkins University Press.
34.
McLaughinM. (2006). Beyond “misery research”: New opportunities for implementation research, policy, and practice. In SugrueC. (Ed.), The future of educational change: International perspectives (pp. 175–190). Routledge.
35.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
NalbandianJ. (1989). Nalbandian on the court and social equity. Public Administration Review, 49(3), 293–294. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i240040
38.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Table 333.10: Revenues of public degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by source of revenue and level of institution: Selected years, 2007-08 through 2019-20. Author. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_333.10.asp
NormanR. (1987). Free and equal. Oxford University Press.
41.
NúñezA.-M. (2017). Flipping the HSI narrative: An HSI positionality. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 11(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.24974/amae.11.3.370
42.
NúñezA.-M.CrispG.ElizondoD. (2016). Mapping Hispanic-serving institutions: A typology of institutional diversity. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2016.0001
43.
PerdomoR. (2019). Hispanic serving institutions, funding, and prestige: Who engages with the Title V grant? (Publication No. 27544622) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
44.
PerezL. (2020). To what extent are Title V grants and educational expenditures associated with educational attainment of Latinxs at Hispanic-serving institutions?Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1538192718801792
45.
PiñedaD. (2010). A federal intervention to improve Latino college participation: evidence from the Title V developing Hispanic-serving institutions program (Publication No. 3441316) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
SalasG. (2011). HACU the advocate. In the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU) (Ed.), 25 years of championing Hispanic higher education: A historical review and a glimpse into the future (pp. 19–30). https://www.hacu.net/images/hacu/about/HACU_History_1986-2011F.pdf
49.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.
SantiagoD. A.TaylorM.Calderón GaldeanoE. (2016). From capacity to success: HSIs, Title V, and Latino students. Excelencia in Education. http://www.edExcelencia.org/research/capacity
53.
SolórzanoD. G. (1994). The baccalaureate origins of Chicana and Chicano doctorates in the physical, life, and engineering sciences: 1980–1990. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1(4), 253–272. https://www.doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v1.i4.10
54.
SolórzanoD. G. (1995). The baccalaureate origins of Chicana and Chicano doctorates in the social sciences. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863950171001
55.
SvaraH.BrunetR.JenningsE. (2004). Filling in the skeletal pillar: Addressing social equity in introductory courses in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 99–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215644
56.
ThelinJ. R. (2017). Research and development: the enterprising campus. In ThelinJ. R. (Ed.), American higher education: Issues and Institutions (1st ed., pp. 250–275). Taylor & Francis.
57.
ThelinJ. R. (2019). A history of American higher education (3rd ed.). John Hopkins Press.
58.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD.Avent-HoltD. (2019). Relational inequalities: An organizational approach. Oxford University Press
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2004). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Department of education could improve its monitoring and assistance (GAO-04-961). Author. https://www.gao.gov/assets/250/244186.pdf
61.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Education has taken steps to improve monitoring and assistance, but further progress is needed (GAO-07-926T). Author. https://www.gao.gov/assets/120/116820.pdf
62.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Management attention to long-standing concerns needed to improve education’s oversight of grant programs (GAO-09-409). Author. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09309.pdf
63.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Sustained attention needed to improve education’s oversight of grant programs (GAO-10-659T). Author. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-659T
64.
ValdezP. L. (2015). An overview of Hispanic-serving institutions’ legislation: Legislation policy formation between 1979 and 1992. In MendezJ. P.Bonner IIF. A.Méndez-NegreteJ.PalmerR. T. (Eds.), Hispanic-Serving Institutions in American Higher Education (pp. 5–29). Stylus Publishing.
65.
VargasN. (2018). Racial expropriation in higher education: Are whiter Hispanic serving institutions more likely to receive minority-serving institution funds?Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118794077
66.
VargasN.Villa-PalominoJ. (2019). Racing to serve or race-ing for money? Hispanic-serving institutions and the colorblind allocation of racialized federal funding. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 5(3), 104–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218769409
67.
WetherholtM. S. (2013). Infrastructure, human resource, and environmental context factor effects on federal R&D funding at state comprehensive universities (Publication No. 3604450) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
68.
WilderC. S. (2013). Ebony and ivory. Bony & ivy: Race, slavery, and the troubled history of America’s universities. Bloomsbury Press.
69.
YoungM. D. (1959). The rise of the meritocracy, 1870–2033: The new elite of our social revolution. Random House.
