Three trends have characterized state policymaking for higher education in the 21st century: divestment, accountability, and race neutrality. These policy agendas are often justified as an attempt to optimize system efficiency and performance by making institutional actors (agents) responsive to the demands of state officials (principals). In this manuscript, we present quantitative evidence that these three policy initiatives have not achieved their stated purpose. We use contemporary social theory to explain why this is the case. Finally, we call for deeper re-engagement of states and their higher education systems in place of transactional and technocratic models.
AntonovicsK.BackesB. (2014). The effect of banning affirmative action on college admissions policies and student quality. The Journal of Human Resources, 49(2), 295–322.
2.
ArchibaldR. B.FeldmanD. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 618–644.
3.
BackesB. (2012). Do affirmative action bans lower minority college enrollment and attainment? Evidence from statewide bans. The Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 435–455.
4.
BakerD. J. (2019). Pathways to racial equity in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1861–1895.
5.
BarnhardtC. L.YoungR. L.SheetsJ. K. E.PhillipsC. W.ParkerE. T.IIIReyesK. (2017). Campus strategic action in the Fisher case: Organizational stakeholder advocacy across the field of higher education. Research in Higher Education, 58, 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9428-9
6.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata (Revised ed.). Stata Press.
7.
CantwellB. (2015). Are international students cash cows? Examining the relationship between new international undergraduate enrollments and institutional revenue at public colleges and universities in the US. Journal of International Students, 5(4), 512–525.
8.
CantwellB.TaylorB. J. (2015). Rise of the science and engineering postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 667–696.
ClarkB. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. University of California Press.
11.
CortesK. E. (2010). Do bans on affirmative action hurt minority students? Evidence from the Texas top 10% plan. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1110–1124.
12.
CrispG.DoranE.Salis ReyesN. A. (2018). Predicting graduation rates at 4-year broad access institutions using a Bayesian modeling approach. Research in Higher Education, 59(2), 133–155.
13.
CrispG.HornC. L.KuczynskiM.ZhouQ.CookE. (2019). Describing and differentiating four-year broad access institutions: An empirical typology. The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1373–1400.
14.
DelaneyJ. A.DoyleW. R. (2007). The role of higher education in state budgets. In ShawK. M.DoyleW. R. (Eds.), State postsecondary education research: New methods to inform policy and practice (pp. 55–76). Stylus.
15.
DelaneyJ. A.DoyleW. R. (2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 343–368.
16.
DelaneyJ. A.DoyleW. R. (2018). Patterns and volatility in state funding for higher education, 1951–2006. Teachers College Record, 120(6), 1–42.
17.
DemingD. J.WaltersC. R. (2017). The impact of price caps and spending cuts on U.S. postsecondary attainment (NBER Working Paper 23736). The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved November 25, 2017, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w23736.
EckelP. D.MorphewC. C. (2009). The organizational dynamics of privatization in public higher education. In MorphewC. C.EckelP. D. (Eds.), Privatizing the public university: Perspectives from across the academy (pp. 88–108). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
FligsteinN.McAdamD. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
23.
FosterJ. M.FowlesJ. (2018). Ethnic heterogeneity, group affinity, and state higher education spending. Research in Higher Education, 59(1), 1–28.
24.
Gallup. (2016). Most in U.S. Oppose colleges considering race in admissions. Gallup.
25.
GándaraD. (2020). How the sausage is made: An examination of a state funding model design process. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 192–221.
26.
GándaraD.JonesS. (2020). Who deserves benefits in higher education? A policy discourse analysis of a process surrounding reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. The Review of Higher Education, 44(1), 121–157.
27.
GarcesL. M. (2012). Racial diversity, legitimacy, and the citizenry: The impact of affirmative action bans on graduate school enrollment. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1S), 93–132.
28.
GarcesL. M. (2018). Don’t lose race-conscious policies. Science, 361(6403), 627.
29.
GonzalesL. D.HallK.BentonA.KanhaiD.NúñezA. M. (2021). Comfort over change: A case study of diversity and inclusivity efforts in U.S. Higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09541-7
30.
GonzalesL. D.NunezA. M. (2014). The ranking regime and the production of knowledge: Implications for academia. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(31).
31.
GriswoldC. P.MarineG. M. (1996). Political influences on state policy: Higher-tuition, higher-aid and the real world. The Review of Higher Education, 19(4), 361–389.
32.
HaddadN. (2021). Philanthropic foundations and higher education: The politics of intermediary organizations. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(6), 897–926.
33.
HagoodL. P. (2019). The financial benefits and burdens of performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41, 189–213. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719837318
34.
HanC.JaquetteO.SalazarK. (2019). Recruiting the out-of-state university: Off-campus recruiting by public research universities. The Joyce Foundation.
35.
HearnJ. C. (2001). Access to postsecondary education: Financing equity in an evolving context. In PaulsenM. B.SmartJ. C. (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy and practice (pp. 439–460). Agathon Press.
36.
HillmanN. W. (2012). Tuition discounting for revenue management. Research in Higher Education, 53(3), 263–281.
37.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.GrossJ. P. K. (2014a). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions?The Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 826–857.
38.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.GrossJ. P. K. (2014b). Market-based higher education: Does Colorado’s voucher model improve higher education access and efficiency?Research in Higher Education, 55(6), 601–625.
39.
HillmanN. W. (2018). Accountability and racial fairness to advance civil rights – A way forward. In OrfieldG.HillmanN. W. (Eds.), Accountability and opportunity in higher education (pp. 175–180). Harvard Education Press.
40.
HillmanN. W.Crespín-TrujilloV. (2018). State accountability policies: Can performance funding be equitable? In OrfieldG.HillmanN. W. (Eds.), Accountability and opportunity in higher education (pp. 45–60). Harvard Education Press.
41.
HillmanN. W.Hicklin FryarA.Crespín-TrujilloV. (2018). Evaluating the impact of performance funding in Ohio and Tennessee. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 144–170.
42.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.FryarA. H. (2015). Evaluating the impacts of “new” performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 501–519.
43.
HinrichsP. (2014). Affirmative action bans and college graduation rates. Economics of Education Review, 42, 43–52.
44.
HollandM. M.FordK. S. (2021). Legitimating prestige through diversity: How higher education institutions represent ethno-racial diversity across levels of selectivity. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(1), 1–30.
45.
HoSangD. M. (2010). Racial propositions: Ballot initiatives and the making of postwar California. University of California Press.
46.
JaquetteO.CursB. R. (2015). Creating the out-of-state university: Do public universities increase nonresident freshman enrollment in response to declining state appropriations?Research in Higher Education, 56(6), 535–565.
47.
JaquetteO.ParraE. (2016). The problem with the Delta Cost Project database. Research in Higher Education, 57(5), 630–651.
48.
JonesS. M. (2014). Diversity leadership under race-neutral policies in higher education. Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal, 33(8), 708–720.
49.
JonesT. (2016). A historical mission in the accountability era: A public HBCU and state performance funding. Educational Policy, 30(7), 999–1041.
50.
JonesT.NicholsA. H. (2020a). Hard truths: why race-conscious policies can fix racism in higher education. The Education Trust. https://edtrust.org/resource/hard-truths/
51.
JonesT.NicholsA. H. (2020b). Hard truths: Why only race-conscious policies can fix racism in higher education. The Education Trust.
52.
JonesV. (2020). Challenging race neutral rhetoric: Black student leaders’ counternarratives of racial salience in PWI student organizations. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(1), 23–32.
53.
JonesV. A.BriscoeK. (2022). Resistance or racism? Unpacking critical race theory bans in a sociopolitical era of anti-racism. The Spencer Foundation.
54.
KelchenR. (2018). Higher education accountability. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
KelchenR.RosingerK. O.OrtagusJ. C. (2019). How to create and use state-level policy data sets in education research. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–14.
56.
LabareeD. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.
57.
LadermanS.KunkleK. (2022). State higher education Finance 2021. SHEEO.
58.
LaneJ. E. (2007). The spider web of oversight: An analysis of external oversight of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 615–644.
59.
LaneJ. E.KivistoJ. A. (2008). Interests, information, and incentives in higher education: Principal-agent theory and its potential applications to the study of higher education governance. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 141–179). Springer.
60.
LeslieL. L.SlaughterS.TaylorB. J.ZhangL. (2012). How do revenue variations affect expenditures within U.S. research universities?Research in Higher Education, 53(6), 614–639.
61.
LiA. Y. (2019). The weight of the metric: Performance funding and the retention of historically underserved students. The Journal of Higher Education, 90, 965–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1602391
62.
LoebS.DynarskiS.McFarlandD.MorrisP.ReardonS.ReberS. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers (NCEE 2017–4023). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
63.
LongM. C.BatemanN. A. (2020). Long-run changes in underrepresentation after affirmative action bans in public universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 188–207.
64.
LyallK.SellK. R. (2006). The true genius of America at risk: Are we losing our public universities to de facto privatization?Greenwood Publishing Group.
65.
MaJ.PenderM. (2022). Trends in college pricing and student aid 2022. The College Board.
66.
MarginsonS. (2012). The “public” contribution of universities in an increasingly global world. In PusserB.KempnerK.MarginsonS.OdorikaI. (Eds.), Universities and the public sphere (pp. 7–25). Routledge.
67.
McClureK. R.BarringerS. N.BrownJ. T. (2020). Privatization as the new normal: Synthesizing literature and reinvigorating research through a multilevel framework. In PernaL. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 589–666). Springer.
68.
McMahonW. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
MusselinC. (2019). Reforms in France: When competition and cooperation clash. International Higher Education, 99, 28–29.
70.
NicholsA. H.Evans-BellD. (2017). A look at Black student success: Identifying top and bottom performing institutions. The Education Trust.
71.
OrphanC. M. (2018). Public purpose under pressure: Examining the effects of neoliberal public policy on the missions of regional comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(2), 59–101.
72.
OrphanC. M.MillerG. N. S. (2020). The company regional comprehensive universities desire to keep: Choosing institutional membership associations. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 300–325.
73.
OrtagusJ.RosingerK.KelchenR. (2021). InformEd states performance-based funding policies dataset. InformEd States. informedstates.org.
74.
Popp BermanE. (2022). Thinking like an economist. Princeton University Press.
RodriguezA.DeaneK. C.DavisC. H.III. (2022). Towards a framework of racialized policymaking in higher education. In PernaL. W. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 37, pp. 519–599). Springer International Publishing.
RosingerK. O.OrtagusJ.KelchenR.CassellA.BrownL. C. (2022). New evidence on the evolution and landscape of performance funding for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 93, 735–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2066269
79.
SaichaieK.MorphewC. C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 499–530.
80.
SauderM.EspelandW. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.
81.
Siegel-HawleyG.FrankenbergE. (2011). Redefining diversity: Political responses to the Post-PICS environment. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(5), 529–552.
StephanP. (2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard University Press.
84.
TaylorB. J. (2022). Wrecked: Deinstitutionalization and partial defenses in state higher education policy. Rutgers University Press.
85.
TaylorB. J.BarringerS. N.WarshawJ. B. (2018). Affiliated nonprofit organizations: Strategic action and research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(4), 422–452.
86.
TaylorB. J.CantwellB. (2015). Global competition, U.S. research universities, and international doctoral education: Growth and consolidation of an organizational field. Research in Higher Education, 56(5), 411–441.
87.
TaylorB. J.CantwellB. (2019). Unequal higher education: Wealth, status and student opportunity. Rutgers University Press.
88.
TaylorB. J.CantwellB.SlaughterS. (2013). Quasi-markets in U.S. higher education: The humanities and institutional revenues. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(5), 675–707.
89.
TaylorB. J.CantwellB.WattsK.WoodO. (2020). Partisanship, White racial resentment, and state support for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(6), 858–887.
90.
ThomasJ. M. (2020). Diversity regimes: Why talk is not enough to fix racial inequality at universities. Rutgers University Press.
91.
TuchmanG. (2009). Wannabe U. University of Chicago Press.
92.
UmbrichtM. R.FernandezF.OrtagusJ. C. (2017). An examination of the (un)intended consequences of performance funding in higher education. Educational Policy, 31(5), 643–673.
93.
WebberD. A. (2017). State divestment and tuition at public institutions. Economics of Education Review, 60, 1–4.
94.
WeertsD. J.RoncaJ. M. (2012). Understanding differences in state support for higher education across states, sectors, and institutions: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(2), 155–185.
95.
Winkle-WagnerR.SulèV. T.MarambaD. C. (2014). When race disappears: College admissions policy discourse in the state of Texas. Educational Policy, 28(4), 516–546.
96.
ZhangL.HuS.SunL.PuS. (2016). The effect of Florida’s Bright Futures program on college choice: A regression discontinuity approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 115–146.
