Florida Senate Bill 1720 drastically changed developmental education, beginning in fall 2014. This paper considers affected faculty members’ perceptions and experiences with the passage and implementation of reform, according to focus group data provided by 294 participants at 21 Florida College System institutions between 2014 and 2019. We found that faculty members experienced feelings of powerlessness and meaninglessness—the two main components of policy alienation—related to the passage of SB 1720, with some reported opportunities for discretion and innovation at a local level. Despite feelings of alienation, faculty worked hard to facilitate student success through the changes.
BaileyT.JaggarsS. S.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2013). Characterizing the effectiveness of developmental education: A response to recent criticism. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
2.
BilskyJ. (2011). Crossing boundaries: Postsecondary readiness assessment in Florida. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(4), 20–24.
3.
BilskyJ.NeuhardI.LockeM. G. (2012). The evolution of workforce baccalaureate degrees in Florida. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2012, 35–46.
4.
Bridwell-MitchellE. N.ShererD. G. (2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247.
5.
BrooksJ. S.HughesR. M.BrooksM. C. (2008). Fear and trembling in the American high school. Educational Policy, 22(1), 45–62.
6.
BrowerR. L.MokherC. G.Bertrand JonesT.CoxB. E.HuS. (2020). From democratic to “need to know”: Linking distributed leadership to data cultures in the Florida College system. AERA Open, 6(1), 1–15.
7.
BrowerR. L.NixA. N.DanielsH.HuX.JonesT. B.HuS. (2021). A pedagogy of preparation: Helping underprepared students succeed in college-level coursework in community colleges. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09531-9
8.
CareyJ. W.GelaudeD. (2008). Systematic methods for collecting and analyzing multidisciplinary team-based qualitative data. In GuestG.MacQueenK. M. (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 227–274). AltaMira Press.
9.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145–170.
10.
CoburnC. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
11.
CoburnC. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349.
12.
CoburnC. E.HillH. C.SpillaneJ. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251.
13.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc.
14.
CrispG.DelgadoC. (2014). The impact of developmental education on community college persistence and vertical transfer. Community College Review, 42(2), 99–117.
15.
DatnowA.BormanG. D.StringfieldS.OvermanL. T.CastellanoM. (2003). Comprehensive school reform in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: Implementation and outcomes from a four-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 143–170.
Florida Student Success Center. (2019). Mathematics re-design: A vision for Florida’s future. Center for Postsecondary Success.
18.
HeckR. H. (2004). Studying educational and social policy: Theoretical concepts and research methods. Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
HodsonR. (1999). Analyzing documentary accounts. SAGE Publications, Inc.
20.
HruschkaD. J.SchwartzD.St. JohnD. C.Picone-DecaroE.JenkinsR. A.CareyJ. W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16(3), 307–331.
21.
HuS.Bertrand JonesT.BrowerR.HarrisonJ.SermonJ.DanielsH.ParkT.MokherC. (2018). Meeting the needs of students: Site visit report of the fourth year of developmental education reform in the Florida College System. Center for Postsecondary Success.
22.
HuS.Bertrand JonesT.BrowerR.ParkT.TandbergD.NixA.RahmingS.MartindaleS. (2015). Learning from the ground up: Developmental education reform at Florida College system institutions. Center for Postsecondary Success.
23.
HuS.ParkT.MokherC.SpencerH.HuX.Bertrand JonesT. (2019). Increasing momentum for student success: Developmental education redesign and student progress in Florida. Center for Postsecondary Success.
24.
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. (n.d). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of higher education, 2018 edition. Author.
25.
KerwinA.MelguizoT.MinorJ.SchoopM.EdgecombeN. (2019, November21- 22). Driving the work forward [Plenary Panel]. Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness 2019 Conference, New York City, NY. https://youtu.be/C0YDXJA2eic
26.
LaneC.SchrynemakersI.KimM. (2020). Examining the academic effects of developmental education reform: Faculty perceptions from a large, public, urban university. Community College Enterprise, 26(1), 27–57.
27.
LochmillerC. R.HedgesS. L. (2017). Education policy implementation research: A call for new approaches. In LesterJ. N.LochmillerC. R.GabrielR. E. (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation (pp. 17–40). Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
LouisK. S.FebeyK.SchroederR. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers’ interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 177–204.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
31.
MokherC. G.Park-GaghanT. J.HuS. (2021). What happens to efficiency and equity? The cost implications of developmental education reform. Research in Higher Education, 62, 151–174.
32.
NienhusserH. K. (2018). Higher education institutional agents as policy implementers: The case of policies that affect undocumented and DACAmented students. The Review of Higher Education, 41(3), 423–453.
33.
OddenA. R. (1991). The evolution of education policy. In OddenA. R. (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 1–12). SUNY Press.
34.
O’TooleL. J. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288.
35.
O’TooleL. J. (2004). The theory-practice issue in policy implementation research. Public Administration, 82(2), 309–329.
36.
ParkT.WoodsC.HuS.Bertrand JonesT.CigO.TandbergD. (2018). Developmental education reform and the racial/ethnic achievement gap: The case of first-semester gateway course passing rates with Florida made developmental education optional. Teachers College Record, 120(12), 1–24.
37.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
38.
PorterR. E.FusarelliL. D.FusarelliB. C. (2015). Implementing the common core: How educators interpret curriculum reform. Educational Policy, 29(1), 111–139.
39.
PülzlH.TreibO. (2007). Implementing public policy. In FischerF.MillerG. J.SydneyM. S. (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89–107). CRC Press.
40.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications, Inc.
41.
Scott-ClaytonJ.RodriguezO. (2015). Development, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation policy. Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 4–45.
42.
SpillaneJ. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 143–175.
43.
SpillaneJ. P.ReiserB. J.ReimerT. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
44.
StillmanJ. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 133–180.
45.
TummersL. (2011). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: A policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 555–581.
46.
TummersL.BekkersV. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
47.
TummersL.BekkersV.SteijnB. (2012). Policy alienation of public professionals: A comparative case study of insurance physicians and secondary school teachers. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(4), 259–271.
48.
TummersL.BekkersV.van ThielS.SteijnB. (2015). The effects of work alienation and policy alienation on behavior of public employees. Administration & Society, 47(5), 596–617.
49.
TummersL. G. (2013). Policy alienation and the power of professionals: Confronting new policies. Edward Elgar.
50.
TummersL. G.SteijnA. J.BekkersV. J. J. M. (2012). Explaining job satisfaction of public professionals: Policy alienation and politicking in organizations [Paper presentation]. The international labour process conference, Leeds, April 5–7, 2011. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/22897/
51.
van EngenN.SteijnB.TummersL. (2019). Do consistent government policies lead to greater meaningfulness and legitimacy on the front line?Public Administration, 97(1), 97–115.
52.
WalkerM. (2015). Exploring faculty perceptions of the impact of accelerated developmental education courses on their pedagogy: A multidisciplinary study. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 32(1), 16–38.
