Dual Enrollment Programs: Litigation and Equity

Abstract

Policymakers and practitioners are increasingly guiding K-12 students into dual enrollment programs. Dual enrollment programs have aided in improving the academic, occupational, and social trajectories of minoritized students although the gains of minoritized students in dual enrollment programs often trail the gains of White students in dual enrollment programs. The research on the legal risk of dual enrollment programs for primary/secondary and postsecondary institutions is scant. The article evaluates whether school districts and/or postsecondary institutions may experience increased risk of litigation arising from the negligent protection of minors on postsecondary campuses. This article uses legal research methods to provide scenarios when harm to minor visitors to college campuses has resulted in judgments against postsecondary institutions. The article provides guidance—based on current legal precedent—for the avoidance of legal liability for school districts and postsecondary institutions participating in dual enrollment programs.

Keywords

college access educational equity educational policy educational reform higher education higher education policy legal issues policy implementation school–university partnerships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroglu

Pathak

Walters

(2015). School vouchers and student achievement: First-year evidence from the Louisiana Scholarship Program (The National Bureau of Economic Research, NEBR Working Paper No. 21839). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21839

Allen

(2010). Dual enrollment: A comprehensive literature review & bibliography. New York: City University of New York, Office of Academic Affairs.

B. P.

(2013). The influence of dual enrollment on academic performance and college readiness: Differences by socioeconomic status. Research in Higher Education, 54, 407-432.

B. P.

Taylor

J. L.

(2015). Are dual enrollment students college ready? Evidence from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(58), 1-30.

Anderson v. Skidmore, 94 A.D.3d 1203 (NY 2012).

Bailey

Karp

M. M.

(2003). Promoting college access and success: A review of credit-based transition programs.Retrieved from Community College Research Center Website, http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/promoting-college-access-success.pdf.

Barnes

Slate

Rojas-LeBouef

(2010). College-readiness and academic preparedness: The same concepts? Current Issues in Education, 13(4). Available from http://cie.asu.edu

Blust v. Berea College, 431 F. Supp. 2d 703 (Ky. 2006).

Borden

V. M.

Taylor

J. L.

Park

Seiler

D. J.

(2013). Dual credit in U.S. higher education: A study of state policy and quality assurance practices. Chicago, IL: Higher Learning Commission.

10.

Boswell

(2001). State policy and postsecondary enrollment options: Creating seamless systems. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2001(113), 7-14.

11.

Breen

Jonsson

J. O.

(2000). Analyzing educational careers: A multinomial transition model. American Sociological Review, 65, 754-772.

12.

Brewer v. Roosevelt Motor Lodge, 295 A.2d 647 (Me. 1972).

13.

Carter

(2009). Equity and empathy: Toward racial and educational achievement in the Obama Era. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 287-297.

14.

Carter v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, 459 So. 2d 1263 (La.1984).

15.

Crossland

(1999). Running start: 1998-1999 annual progress report. Olympia: Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges.

16.

Dobson v. State of Tennessee, 23 S.W.3d 324 (Tn. 1999).

17.

Doelker v. Ohio State University, 573 N.E.2d 809 (Oh. 1990).

18.

Education Commission of the States. (2015). 50-state Comparisons: Dual/concurrent enrollment policies. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/dual-concurrent-enrollment-policies/

19.

Fla.Stat. § 1007.271. (2015).

20.

Gamoran

Mare

R. D.

(1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146-1183.

21.

Ganzert

(2012). The effects of dual enrollment credit on gender and race. Current Issues in Education, 15(3), 1-9.

22.

Geiger

(2015). Impact of the financial crisis on higher education in the United States. International Higher Education, 59, 9-11.

23.

Gilpin v. Ivy Tech State College, 864 N.E.2d 399 (In. 2007).

24.

Green

P. C.

Frankenberg

Nelson

S. L.

Rowland

(2012). Charter schools, students of color and the state action doctrine: Are the rights of students of color sufficiently protected? Washington & Lee Journal of Civil Rights & Social Justice, 18(2), 253-275.

25.

Hamby v. State of Tennessee, 2004 Tenn. App. LEXIS 501 (Tn. 2004).

26.

Heath

L. A.

(2008). Community college and university experiences of high school dual enrollment students. Boca Raton: Florida Atlantic University.

27.

Hoffman

(2005). Add and subtract: Dual enrollment as a state strategy to increase postsecondary success for underrepresented students. Retrieved from Jobs for the Future Website, http://www.jff.org/publications/add-and-subtract-dual-enrollment-state-strategy-increase-postsecondary-success.

28.

Hoffman

Vargas

Santos

(2009). New directions for dual enrollment: Creating stronger pathways from high school through college. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2009(145), 43-58.

29.

Hughes

K. L.

Karp

M. M.

Bunting

Friedel

(2005). Dual enrollment/dual credit: Its role in career pathways. In Hull

Dan M.

(Ed.), Career pathways: Education with a purpose (pp. 227-255). Waco, TX: Center for Occupational Research and Development.

30.

Karp

M. J. M.

Jeong

D. W.

(2008). Conducting research to answer your questions about dual enrollment. Retrieved from the Community College Research Center Website, http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/conducting-research-dual-enrollment.html.

31.

Kim

(2006). The impact of dual and articulated credit on college readiness and total credit hours in four selected community colleges (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

32.

Kim

Barnett

Bragg

(2003). Dual credit in Illinois: Results of expert panel deliberations and a Delphi study of definitions and priorities. Champaign: Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

33.

Klein

(2007, August). Acceleration under review. Education Week, 26(44), 22-24.

34.

Kyburg

Hertberg-Davis

Callahan

(2007). Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate programs: Optimal learning environments for talented minorities? Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 172-215.

35.

Leger v. Stockton Unified School District, 202 Cal. App. 3d 1448 (1988).

36.

McCarthy

C. R.

(1999). Dual-enrollment programs: Legislation helps high school students enroll in college courses. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 24-32.

37.

McCarthy v. Broward College, 164 So. 3d 78 (Fla. 2015).

38.

Meade

Hofmann

(2007). CUNY College Now: Extending the reach of dual enrollment. In Hoffman

Vargas

Venezia

Miller

M.S.

(Eds.), Minding the gap (pp. 143-150). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

39.

Morrison

M. C.

(2008). The strategic value of dual enrollment programs. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 83(7), 26-27.

40.

Mullins v. Pine Manor College, 449 N.E.2d 331 (Mass. 1983).

41.

National Alliance for Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships. (n.d.). What is concurrent enrollment? Retrieved from http://www.nacep.org/about-nacep/what-is-concurrent-enrollment/

42.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Rates of high school completion and bachelor’s degree attainment among persons age 25 and over, by race/ethnicity and sex: Selected years, 1910 through 2013. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_104.10.asp

43.

Nelson

S. L.

(2016a). Different script, same caste in the use of active and passive racism: A Critical Race Theory analysis of the (ab)use of ‘“house rules” in race-related education cases. Washington & Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 22(2), 297-356.

44.

Nelson

S. L.

(2016b). Killing two achievements with one stone: The intersectional impact of Shelby County on the rights to vote and access high performing schools. Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal, 13(2), 225-272.

45.

Nelson

S. L.

(2017a). Racail subjugation by another name? Using the links in the school-to-prison pipeline to reassess state takeover district performance. Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives, 9(1), 1-33.

46.

Nelson

S. L.

(2017b). Special education reform policies and the permanence of oppression: A critical race case study of Shelby County, Tennessee. Howard Law Journal, 60.

47.

Nelson

S. L.

(2017c). Still serving two masters? Evaluating the conflict between school choice and desegregation under the lens of Critical Race Theory. Boston Unversity Public Interest Law Journal, 26.

48.

Nelson

S. L.

Bennett

H. N.

(2016). Are Black parents locked out of challenging disproportionately low charter school board representation? Assessing the role of the federal courts in building a house of cards. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 12(2), 153-203.

49.

Nelson

S. L

Grace

J. E.

(2016). The right to remain silent in New Orleans: The role of non-politically accountable charter school boards in the school-to-prison pipeline. Nova Law Review, 40(2), 447-492.

50.

O’Brien

D. M.

Nelson

T. D.

(2004). Strengthening college preparation and access through concurrent enrollment in high school and community college. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Dallas.

51.

Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor, Program Evaluation Division. (1996). Postsecondary Enrollment Options Program. Retrieved from http://www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us/ped/1996/Pseo.htm

52.

Owen

. (2007). The five elements of negligence. Hofstra Law Review, 35, 1671-1886.

53.

Price

P. D.

Schneider

D. K.

Quick

L. A.

(2016). Financial challenges in higher education: Community college leadership style and ranking. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40, 508-522.

54.

Sloan

(2010). Coming to terms with common core standards. Retrieved from the Association for Supevision and Curriculum Development Website, http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/policy-priorities/vol16/issue4/full/Coming-to-Terms-with-Common-Core-Standards.aspx.

55.

Smith

(2014). Access and diversity in the running start program. Washington Student Achievement Council. Retrieved from http://www.wsac.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2014.04.24.052c.Report.Running%20Start.pdf

56.

Speroni

(2011, April). Determinants of students’ success: The role of Advanced Placement and dual enrollment programs (An NCPR working paper). Retreived from the Community College Research Center Website, http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/presentation/determinants-students-success.html.

57.

Stanton v. University of Maine System, 773 A.2d 1045 (Me. 2001).

58.

Thompson v. Kent State University, 521 N.E.2d 526 (Oh. 1987).

59.

Tilak

(2015). Global trends in funding higher education. International Higher Education, 42, 1-3.

60.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect (State statutes, current through August 2015). Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/manda.pdf#page=5&;view=Summaries%20of%20State%20laws

61.

Ward

(2006). Improving equity and access for low-income and minority youth into institutions of higher education. Urban Education, 41, 50-70.

62.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Sass

Witte

(2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG869.html