Over the last several years, there has been an increased awareness regarding consensual sexual relationships (CSRs) between professors and students. Specifically, there has been a growing movement for academic institutions to develop policies addressing, discouraging, and/or prohibiting these relationships due to the potential for sexual harassment cases. Even though the appropriateness of such relationships has been widely debated among the university community, a limited amount of empirical work has examined this issue with the majority focusing on attitudinal studies. The current exploratory study consists of a content analysis of 278 faculty and student responses to the question, “If there is a difference between consensual sexual relationships and sexual harassment, what is it?” Responses indicate that there are several overlapping themes for both faculty and students in how they view these differences, with a large number of responses specifically indicating themes such as “CSR is consensual” while “sexual harassment is one sided.” There are also some unique perspectives given by faculty regarding the complexities and acceptability of CSRs, who are generally more specific and nuanced in their answers. Considering the complexities of this issue, it is the recommendation of the current study that much more research fully exploring the attitudes of faculty and students is needed to develop a well-rounded and comprehensive policy.
BellasM. L.GossettJ. L. (2001). Love of the “lecherous professor”: Consensual sexual relationships between professors and students. The Sociological Quarterly, 42, 529-558.
3.
BergB. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
4.
Bernstein-YamashiroB.NoamG. G. (2013). Teacher-student relationships: Toward personalized education [Special issue]. New Directions for Youth Development, 2013(137).
5.
BiaggioM.PagetT. L.ChenowethM. S. (1997). A model for ethical management of faculty-student dual relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Purpose, 28, 184-189.
6.
BirchM.ElliottD.TrankelM. A. (1999). Black and white and shades of gray: A portrait of the ethical professor. Ethics & Behavior, 9, 243-261.
7.
Blevins-KnabeB. (1992). The ethics of dual relationships in higher education. Ethics & Behavior, 2, 151-163.
8.
BowmanV. E.HatleyL. D.BowmanR. L. (1995). Faculty-student relationships: The dual role controversy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 232-242.
9.
BoydC. (2010). The debate of romance in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 325-338.
10.
BrownL. S. (1991). Ethical issues in feminist therapy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 323-336.
11.
CarlsonR. R. (2001). Romantic relationships between professors and their students: Morality, ethics, and law. South Texas Law Review, 42, 493-508.
12.
ChoryR. M.OffsteinE. H. (2018). Too close for comfort? Faculty–student multiple relationships and their impact on student classroom conduct. Ethics & Behavior, 28, 23-44. doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1206475
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
DeChiaraP. (1987). The need for universities to have rules on consensual sexual relationships between faculty members and students. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 21.
15.
DixonN. (1996). The morality of intimate faculty-student relationships. Monist, 79, 519-536.
16.
DrouinM.TobinE. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412-418. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
17.
EiS.BowenA. (2002). College students’ perceptions of student-instructor relationships. Ethics & Behavior, 12, 177-190. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1202_5
18.
Feldman-SummersS. (1989). Sexual contact in fiduciary relationships. In GabbardG. O. (Ed.), Sexual exploitation in professional relationships (pp. 193-210). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
19.
FitzgeraldL. F.WeitzmanL. M.GoldY.OrmerodM. (1988). Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholarly garb. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 329-340.
20.
ForellC. (1997). What’s wrong with faculty-student sex? The law school context. Journal of Legal Education, 47, 47-72.
21.
FrickD. (1994). Nonsexual boundary violations in psychiatric treatment. In OldhamJ. M.RibaM. B. (Eds.), Review of psychiatry (Vol. 13, pp. 415-432). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
22.
GarlandT. S.PolicastroC.RichardsT. N.McGuffeeK. (2016). Blaming the victim: University student attitudes toward bullying. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26, 69-87.
23.
GibbsN. (1995, April3). Romancing the student: Rattled by lawsuits, colleges are cracking down on faculty-student love affairs. Time, 145(14), 58-59.
24.
GlaserR. D.ThorpeJ. S. (1986). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 41, 43-51.
25.
GlassL. L. (2003). The gray areas of boundary crossings and violations. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 57, 429-444.
26.
GossettJ. L.BellasM. L. (2012). You can’t put a rule around people’s hearts . . . can you? Consensual relationships policies in academia. Sociological Focus, 35, 267-283. doi:10.1080/00380237.2002.10570703
27.
HagenauerG.VoletS. E. (2014). Teacher-student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 370-388. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.921613
28.
Hayes-SmithB.RichardsT. N.BranchK. (2010). “But I am not a counselor”: The nature of role strain experienced by female professors when a student discloses sexual assault and intimate partner violence. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 2(3), 1-24.
29.
HaywoodH.SwankE. (2008). Rape myths among Appalachian college students. Violence and Victims, 23, 373-389.
30.
HensleyC.TallichetS. E.DutkiewiczE. L. (2011). Exploring the age of onset and recurrence of childhood animal cruelty: Can animal cruelty be learned from witnessing others commit it?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 492-502.
31.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (2011). The practice of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
32.
HolmesD. L.RupertP. A.RossS. A.ShaperaW. E. (1999). Student perceptions of dual relationships between faculty and students. Ethics & Behavior, 9, 79-106. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0902_1
33.
JafarA. (2003). Consent or coercion? Sexual relationships between college faculty and students. Gender Issues, 21, 43-58.
34.
JohanssonS.KenttaG.AndersonM. B. (2016). Desires and taboos: Sexual relationships between coaches and athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11, 589-598.
35.
Keith-SpiegelP. C.WhitleyB. E.BaloghD. W.PerkinsD. V.WittigA. F. (2002). The ethics of teaching: A casebook (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
KellerE. A. (1988). Consensual amorous relationships between faculty and students: The constitutional right to privacy. Journal of College and University Law, 15, 21-42.
37.
KitchenerK. S. (1992). Psychologist as teacher and mentor: Affirming ethical values throughout the curriculum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 190-195.
38.
KolbertJ.B.MorganB.BrendelJ.M. (2002). Faculty and student perceptions of dual relationships within counselor education: A qualitative analysis. Counselor Education & Supervision, 41, 193-206.
39.
KraskaP. B.NeumanW. L. (2011). Criminal justice and criminological research methods. Boston, MA: Pearson.
40.
LittleD.ThompsonJ. (1989). Campus policies, the law, and sexual relationships. Thought & Action: The NEA Higher Education Journal, 5, 17-24.
41.
MackM. H. (1999). Regulating sexual relationships between faculty and students. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 6, 79-112.
42.
MaxfieldM. G.BabbieE. R. (2016). Basics of research method form criminal justice and criminology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
OwenP. R.Zwahr-CastroJ. (2007). Boundary issues in academia: Student perceptions of faculty-student boundary crossings. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 117-129. doi:10.1080/10508420701378065
45.
PaludiM. A. (1996). Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46.
PetersonM. R. (1992). At personal risk: Boundary violations in professional client-relationships. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
47.
QuatrellaL. A.WentworthD. K. (1995). Students’ perceptions of unequal status dating relationships in academia. Ethics & Behavior, 5, 249-259.
48.
RichardsT. N.CrittendenC.GarlandT. S.McGuffeeK. (2014). An exploration of policies governing faculty-to-student consensual sexual relationships on university campuses: Current strategies and future directions. Journal of College Student Development, 55, 337-352.
49.
RoordaD. L.KoomenH. M. Y.SpiltJ. L.OortF. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493-529.
50.
SecundaP. M. (2004). Getting to the nexus of the matter: A sliding scale approach to faculty-student consensual relationship policies in higher education. Syracuse Law Review, 55, 55-85.
51.
SivoS. A.SaunderC.ChangQ.JiangJ. J. (2006). How low should you go? Low response rates and the validity of inference in IS questionnaire research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 351-414.
52.
SullivanE. (2004). Perceptions of consensual amorous relationship policies (CARPS). Journal of College & Character, 5(8). Available from http://journals.naspa.org/
53.
TabachnickB. G.Keith-SpiegelP.PopeK. S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist, 25, 738-747.
54.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ZakrzewskiR. F. (2006). A national survey of American psychological association student affiliates’ involvement and ethical training in psychology educator-student sexual relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 724-730.
