Arizona has played a large part in the development and implementation of policy that directly inhibits equity of opportunity for the English learner (EL) population, the largest and most damaging of which came out of legislation passed due to the Flores v. Arizona case which concluded in 2015. This research article seeks to critically challenge how Arizona-reified barriers to learning ELs continue to experience. This article serves as a post-mortem to Flores v. Arizona and measures the relationship between targeted EL expenditures as a function of the percentage of ELs within districts. The findings suggest that the scale of ELs within districts is inversely related to targeted EL expenditures. Furthermore, Arizona has reified laws that inhibit EL educational opportunities across the state.
AbediJ. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4–14.
2.
AbediJ.GándaraP. (2006). Performance of English language learners as a subgroup in large-scale assessment: Interaction of research and policy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 36–46.
3.
AbediJ.HermanJ. (2010). Assessing English language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: Issues and limitations. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 723–746.
4.
AdamsM.JonesK. M. (2006). Unmasking the myths of structured English immersion: Why we still need bilingual educators, native language instruction, and incorporation of home culture. The Radical Teacher, 75, 16–21.
5.
AdamsonF.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37), 1–46.
6.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 516 (Feb. 19, 2009).
7.
AriasM. B. (2012). Language policy and teacher preparation: The implications of a restrictive language policy on teacher preparation. In AriasM. B.FaltisC. (Eds.), Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI (pp. 3–20). Short Run Press.
8.
AriasM. B.FaltisC. (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI. Short Run Press.
9.
Arizona House Bill 2010, 45th Legislature, 2nd Special Session (Arizona 2001).
10.
Arizona House Bill 2064, 47th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (Arizona 2006).
11.
Arizona Proposition 203, English for the Children, (Arizona 2010).
Arizona State House Bill 2121, 53rd Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (Arizona 2018).
15.
Arizona State House Bill 2281, 49th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (Arizona 2010).
16.
Arizona State Senate Bill 1014, 54th Legislature, 1st Regular Session (Arizona 2019).
17.
AugustD.GoldenbergC.RuedaR. (2010). Restrictive state language policies: Are they scientifically based? In GándaraP.HopkinsM. (Eds.), Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 139–158). Teachers College Press.
18.
BakerB. D. (2012). Revisiting the age-old question: Does money matter in education? Albert Shanker Institute.
19.
BardackS. (2010). Common ELL terms and definitions. American Institutes of Research.
20.
BatalovaJ.McHughM. (2010). Number and growth of students in U.S. schools in need of English instruction. Migration Policy Institute.
21.
BerlinerD. (2013). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America’s youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12), 1–26.
22.
Betters-BubonJ. J.SchultzJ. W. (2017). School counselors as social justice leaders: An innovative school–family–community partnership with Latino students and families. Professional School Counseling, 21(1b), 1–11.
23.
BettsJ.RoemerJ. E. (2005). Equalizing opportunity for racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States through educational finance reform. Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.
24.
BlackmoreJ. (2013). A feminist critical perspective on educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 139–154.
25.
BosworthM. H. (2014). Courts as catalysts: State supreme courts and public school finance equity. State University of New York Press.
26.
BreenR.JonssonJ. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 223–243.
27.
BrewerR. M.HeitzegN. A. (2008). The racialization of crime and punishment: Criminal justice, color-blind racism, and the political economy of the prison industrial complex. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(5), 625–644.
28.
BrooksJ. S.KnausC. B.ChangH. (2015). Educational leadership against racism: Challenging policy, pedagogy, & practice. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(1), 1–5.
29.
BrownA. L.De LissovoyN. (2011). Economies of racism: Grounding education policy research in the complex dialectic of race, class, and capital. Journal of Education Policy, 26(5), 595–619.
30.
BulkleyK. (2005). Understanding the charter school concept in legislation: The cases of Arizona, Michigan, and Georgia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(4), 527–554.
31.
CabreraN. L.MesaE. L.RodriguezR. (2011). The fight for ethnic studies in Tucson. North American Congress on Latin America’s Report on the Americas, 44(6), 20–24.
32.
CabreraN. L.MezaE. L.RomeroA. J.RodríguezR. C. (2013). “If there is no struggle, there is no progress”: Transformative youth activism and the school of ethnic studies. The Urban Review, 45(1), 7–22.
33.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328.
34.
Caminero-SantangeloM. (2007). On Latinidad: US Latino literature and the construction of ethnicity. University Press of Florida.
35.
CammarotaJ. (2006). A critically compassionate pedagogy for Latino youth. Latino Studies, 4(3), 305–312.
36.
CammarotaJ.RomeroA. (2006). A critically compassionate intellectualism for Latina/o students: Raising voices above the silencing in our schools. Multicultural Education, 14(2), 16–23.
37.
CampbellK. M. (2011). The road to SB 1070: How Arizona became ground zero for the immigrants’ rights movement and the continuing struggle for Latino civil rights in America. Harvard Law Review, 14(1), 1–22.
38.
CarloM. S.AugustD.McLaughlinB.SnowC. E.DresslerC.LippmanD. N.. . . WhiteC. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.
39.
CarpenterD. M.KaferK. (2012). A history of private school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(3), 336–350.
40.
Castañeda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1981).
41.
Chávez-MorenoL. C. (2019). Researching Latinxs, racism, and white supremacy in bilingual education: A literature review. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 17(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2019.1624966
42.
Chavez-ReyesC. (2010). Inclusive approaches to parent engagement for young English language learners and their families. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 109(2), 474–504.
43.
Chen-GaddiniM.BurrE. (2016). Long-term English learner students: Spotlight on an overlooked population. REL West.
44.
CobbC. D.GlassG. V. (2009). School choice in a post-desegregation world. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 262–278.
45.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfeldF. D.YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office.
46.
CombsM. C.IddingsA. C. D. S.MollL. C. (2014). 21st century linguistic apartheid: English language learners in Arizona public schools. In OrelusP. (Ed.), Affirming language diversity in schools and society. Beyond linguistic apartheid (pp. 41–52). Routledge.
47.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
48.
DabachD. B. (2014). “I am not a shelter!” Stigma and social boundaries in teachers’ accounts of students’ experience in separate “sheltered” English learner classrooms. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19(2), 98–124.
49.
DeCuirJ. T.DixsonA. D. (2004). So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26–31.
50.
DeeT.WestM. (2011). The non-cognitive returns to class size. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 23–46.
51.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2012). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York University Press.
52.
DiemS. (2017). A critical policy analysis of the politics, design, and implementation of student assignment policies. In YoungM. D.DiemS. (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 43–62). Springer.
53.
DiemS.YoungM. D.WeltonA. D.MansfieldK. C.LeeP. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090.
54.
DynarskyS.HymanJ. M.SchanzenbachD. W. (2013). Experimental evidence on the effect of childhood investments on postsecondary attainment and degree completion. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 692–717.
55.
Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974, S.204, 20 U.S.C
56.
FeaginJ. R.CobasJ. A. (2015). Latinos facing racism: Discrimination, resistance, and endurance. Routledge.
57.
Flores v. Arizona, No. 92-CV-596-TUC-RCC. (2013).
58.
Flores v. Arizona, No. 92-CV-596-TUC-RCC. (2015).
59.
Flores v. Huppenthal, No. 13-15805. (2015).
60.
FrancisB. (2006). Heroes or zeroes? The discursive positioning of “underachieving boys” in English neo-liberal education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 187–200.
61.
FredricksD. E. S.WarrinerD. (2016). “We speak English in here and English only!” Teacher and ELL youth perspectives on restrictive language education. Bilingual Research Journal, 39(3–4), 309–323.
62.
GamoranA.LongD. A. (2006). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40-year retrospective. Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
GándaraP.Maxwell-JollyJ.DriscollA. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Policy Analysis for California Education.
65.
GándaraP.MordechayK. (2017). Demographic change and the new (and not so new) challenges for Latino education. The Educational Forum, 81(2), 148–159.
66.
GándaraP.OrfieldG. (2010). A return to the “Mexican room”: The segregation of Arizona’s English learners. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
67.
GándaraP.OrfieldG. (2012a). Segregating Arizona’s English learners: A return to the “Mexican room.”Teachers College Record, 114(9), 1–27.
68.
GándaraP.OrfieldG. (2012b). Why Arizona matters: The historical, legal, and political contexts of Arizona’s instructional policies and US linguistic hegemony. Language Policy, 11(1), 7–19.
69.
GándaraP.RumbergerR. W. (2008). Defining an adequate education for English learners. Education, 3(1), 130–148.
70.
GándaraP.RumbergerR. W.Maxwell-JollyJ.CallahanR. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36), 1–54.
71.
GansJ. (2007). The economic impact of immigrants in Arizona. Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy.
72.
GarciaE. E. (2011). ¡Ya Basta!: Challenging restrictions on English language learners. Dissent, 58(4), 47–50.
73.
GarciaE. E.LawtonK.DinizdeFigueiredoE. H. (2010). Assessment of young English language learners in Arizona: Questioning the validity of the state measure of English proficiency. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
74.
GarciaO.KleifgenJ. A. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English language learners. Teachers College Press.
75.
GarciaO.MenkenK. (2006). The English of Latinos from a plurilingual transcultural angle: Implications for assessment and schools. In NeroS. J. (Ed.), Dialects, Englishes, creoles, and education (pp. 167–183). Taylor & Francis.
76.
GayG. (2000). Culturally relevant teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
77.
GeneseeF.Lindholm-LearyK.SaundersW.ChristianD. (2005). English language learners in US schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(4), 363–385.
78.
GillbornD. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505.
79.
GillbornD.Ladson-BillingsG. (2010). Education and critical race theory. In AppleM. W.BallS. J.GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 37–47). Routledge.
80.
GoldenbergC.Rutherford-QuachS. (2012). The Arizona home language survey: The under-identification of students for English language services. Language Policy, 11(1), 21–30.
81.
GoodT. L.BradenJ. S. (2014). The great school debate: Choice, vouchers, and charters. Routledge.
82.
GoodenM. A. (2012). What does racism have to do with leadership? Countering the idea of color-blind leadership: A reflection on race and the growing pressures of the urban principalship [Special issue]. Journal of Educational Foundations, 26(1–2), 67–84.
83.
GradanteW. (1982). El Hijo del Pueblo: “José Alfredo Jiménez and the Mexican” Canción Ranchera. Latin American Music Review/Revista de Música Latinoamericana, 3(1), 36–59.
84.
GraueE.RauscherE.SherfinskiM. (2009). The synergy of class size reduction and classroom quality. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 178–201.
85.
GreeneA. D. (2014). Tracking work: Race-ethnic variation in vocational course placement and consequences for academic and career outcomes. International Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 09–18.
86.
HazeltonA. J. (2016). Abrazando el Espíritu: Bracero Families Confront the US-Mexico Border by Ana Elizabeth Rosas. Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas, 13(2), 129–131.
87.
HeinekeA. J. (2015). Negotiating language policy and practice: Teachers of English learners in an Arizona study group. Educational Policy, 29(6), 843–878.
88.
HeinekeA. J. (2016). Restrictive language policy in practice: English learners in Arizona. Multilingual Matters.
89.
HeiseM. (1995). State constitutions, school finance litigation, and the third wave: From equity to adequacy. Temple Law Review, 68(1), 1151–1176.
90.
HoffmanD.RexT. (2009). Education funding in Arizona: Constitutional requirement and the empirical record. Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research.
91.
HoganT. M.PetersD. M.MackinK. (2010). Education and the Arizona constitution. Phoenix Law Review, 3(1), 99–113.
92.
HorsfordS. D.SampsonC. (2013). High-ELL-growth states: Expanding funding equity and opportunity for English language learners. Voices in Urban Education, 37(1), 47–54.
93.
HowardT. C. (2010). Why race and culture matter in schools: Closing the achievement gap in America’s classrooms. Teachers College Press.
94.
HuntA. (1986). The theory of critical legal studies. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 6(1), 1–45.
95.
IddingsA. C. D.CombsM. C.MollL. (2012). In the arid zone drying out educational resources for English language learners through policy and practice. Urban Education, 47(2), 495–514.
96.
JacksonC. K.JohnsonR. C.PersicoC. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218.
97.
JasisP. M.Ordoñez-JasisR. (2012). Latino parent involvement: Examining commitment and empowerment in schools. Urban Education, 47(1), 65–89.
98.
Jiménez-CastellanosO. (2012). School finance and English language learners: A legislative perspective. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 4(1), 12–24.
99.
Jiménez-CastellanosO. (2017). English language learner education finance scholarship: An introduction to the special issue. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(14), 1–13.
100.
Jiménez-CastellanosO.CombsM. C.MartinezD.GomezL. (2013). English language learners: What’s at stake for Arizona?The Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
101.
Jimenez-CastellanosO.GarcíaE. (2017). Intersection of language, class, ethnicity, and policy: Toward disrupting inequality for English language learners. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 428–452.
102.
Jimenez-CastellanosO.MartinezD. (2014). Arizona. Journal of Education Finance, 39(3), 247–249.
103.
Jimenez-CastellanosO.MartinezD. (2015). Arizona. Journal of Education Finance, 41(2), 202–205.
104.
Jimenez-CastellanosO.MartinezD. (2017). Arizona. Journal of Education Finance, 42(3), 253–255.
105.
Jimenez-CastellanosO.MartínezD.G. (in press). Examining the relationship between school district revenue and English language learners post Horne v. Flores in Arizona. Journal of Education Human Resources.
106.
Jimenez-SilvaM.GomezL.CisnerosJ. (2014). Examining Arizona’s policy response post Flores v. Arizona in educating K–12 English language learners. Journal of Latinos and Education, 13(3), 181–195.
107.
KingJ. (1991). Dysconcious racism: Ideology, identity, and the miseducation of teachers. The Journal of Negro Education, 60(2), 133–146.
108.
KoenkerR.HallockK. F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143–156.
109.
KrashenS.RolstadK.MacSwanJ. (2007). Review of “research summary and bibliography for structured English immersion programs” of the Arizona English Language Learners Task Force. Institute for Language Education and Policy.
110.
KruegerA. B. (2003). Economic considerations and class size. The Economic Journal, 113(485), 34–63.
111.
LaddH. F.ChalkR.HansenJ. S. (1999). Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives. National Academy Press.
112.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.
113.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
114.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of black children. Jossey-Bass.
115.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
116.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (Eds.). (2006). Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy. Teachers College Press.
117.
LafortuneJ.RothsteinJ.SchanzenbachD. W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 1–26.
118.
LawsonM. A.Alameda-LawsonT. (2012). A case study of school-linked, collective parent engagement. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 651–684.
119.
LillieK. E. (2016). The lost generation: Students of Arizona’s structured English immersion. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(4), 408–425.
120.
LillieK. E.MarkosA.EstrellaA.NguyenT.TrifiroA.AriasM. B.. . .PerezK. (2010). Policy in practice: The implementation of structured English immersion in Arizona. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
121.
LongM. H.AdamsonH. D. (2012). SLA research and Arizona’s structured English immersion policies. In AriasM. B.FaltisC. (Eds.), Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI (pp. 39–55). Short Run Press.
122.
LópezM. P.LópezG. R. (2009). Persistent inequality: Contemporary realities in the education of undocumented Latina/o students. Routledge.
123.
MarantoR.GreshamA. (2018). The wild west of education reform: Arizona charter schools. In MarantoR.MillimanS.HessF.GreshamA. (Eds.) School Choice in the Real World Lessons from Arizona Charter Schools (pp. 99–114).Routledge.
MartinezD.G.Jimenez-CastellanosO. (2018). Arizona. Journal of Education Finance, 43(3), 226–228.
126.
MartinezD.G. (2019). The state of Arizona school finance 2018-2019. Journal of Education Finance, 44(3), 244–246.
127.
MartinezD.G.BegayV.H.Jimenez-CastellanosO. (2019). Understanding Navajo K-12 public school finance in Arizona through tribal critical theory. Teachers College Record, 121(5).
128.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.de BreyC.SnyderT.WangX.Wilkinson-FlickerS.. . . HinzS. (2017). The condition of education 2017. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017144
129.
McKennaM. K.MillenJ. (2013). Look! Listen! Learn! Parent narratives and grounded theory models of parent voice, presence, and engagement in K-12 education. School Community Journal, 23(1), 9–48.
130.
MilesK. H.FeinbergR. (2014). Seizing the moment for transformation: California’s local control funding formula. Education Resource Strategies.
131.
MilnerH. R. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718.
132.
MoranR. F. (2010). Equal liberties and English language learners: The special case of structured immersion initiatives. Howard Law Journal, 54(2), 397–423.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
135.
O’LearyA. O.RomeroA. J.CabreraN. L.RasconM. (2012). Assault on ethnic studies. In Santa AnnaO.de BustamanteC. Gonza’lez (Eds.), Arizona firestorm: Global realities, national media and provincial politics (pp. 97–120). Rowman & Littlefield.
136.
OlsenL. (2014). Meeting the unique needs of long term English language learners: A guide for educators. National Education Association.
137.
PadillaF. M. (1985). Latino ethnic consciousness: The case of Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans in Chicago. University of Notre Dame Press.
138.
PaganA.UllahA. (1999). Nonparametric econometrics. Cambridge university press.
139.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
140.
PeskeH. G.HaycockK. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality: A report and recommendations by the education trust. The Education Trust.
PowersJ. M. (2014). From segregation to school finance: The legal context for language rights in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 81–105.
143.
PowersJ. M.PottertonA. U. (2018). The rich get richer: Inequalities in public school tax credit donations to charter schools in Arizona. Policy Futures in Education, 17(2), 246–265.
144.
Prohibited Courses and Classes; Enforcement, A.R.S. §15-112. (2010).
145.
RamirezD. (2010, February). Building family support for student achievement: CABE project INSPIRE parent leadership development program [Conference ed., California Association for Bilingual Education]. Multilingual Educator, pp. 6–12.
146.
RazfarA.RumenappJ. C. (2012). Language ideologies in English learner classrooms: Critical reflections and the role of explicit awareness. Language Awareness, 21(4), 347–368.
147.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In MurnaneR.DuncanG. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children (pp. 91–116). Russell Sage Foundation.
148.
RevillaA. T. (2000). LatCrit and CRT in the field of education: A theoretical dialogue between two colleagues. Denver University Law Review, 78(1), 623–632.
149.
Rios-AguilarC.CanchéM. S. G.SabetghadamS. (2012). Evaluating the impact of restrictive language policies: The Arizona 4-hour English language development block. Language Policy, 11(1), 47–80.
150.
RohrleitnerM. C. (2013). Pan-Latinidad. Oxford University Press.
151.
Santa AnaO.de BustamanteC. G. (Eds.). (2012). Arizona firestorm: Global immigration realities, national media, and provincial politics. Rowman & Littlefield.
152.
SchanzenbachD. W. (2014). Does class size matter?National Education Policy Center.
153.
ShapiroJ. P.StefkovichJ. A. (2016). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (4th ed.). Routledge.
SugarmanJ.GearyC. (2018). English learners in select states: Demographics, outcomes, and state accountability policies [Fact sheet]. Migration Policy Institute.
156.
ThomasM. H.AletheianiD. R.CarlsonD. L.EwbankA. D. (2014). “Keeping up the good fight”: The said and unsaid in Flores v. Arizona. Policy Futures in Education, 12(2), 242–261.
157.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2018). Public education funding inequity in an era of increasing concentration of poverty and resegregation.
158.
ValdezC. R.PadillaB.ValentineJ. L. (2013). Consequences of Arizona’s immigration policy on social capital among Mexican mothers with unauthorized immigration status. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 35(3), 303–322.
159.
VélezL. G. (2011). Persistent inequality: Contemporary realities in the education of undocumented Latina/o students. Latino Studies, 9(2), 354–356.
160.
VerriG. J.FrançaA. (2013). Xenophobic and racist legislations. UFRGSMUN/UFRGS Model United Nations Journal, 1(1), 264–285.
161.
VerstegenD. A. (1998). Judicial analysis during the new wave of school finance litigation: The new adequacy in education. Journal of Education Finance, 24(1), 51–68.
162.
ViterittiJ. (2012). Choosing equality: School choice, the constitution, and civil society. Brookings Institution Press.
163.
WallaceS. J. (2014). Papers please: State-level anti-immigrant legislation in the wake of Arizona’s SB 1070. Political Science Quarterly, 129(2), 261–291.
164.
WrightW. E. (2005). English language learners left behind in Arizona: The nullification of accommodations in the intersection of federal and state policies. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(1), 1–29.
165.
YoungM. D.DiemS. (2018). Doing critical policy analysis in education research: An emerging paradigm. In LochmillerC. R. (Ed.), Complementary research methods for educational leadership and policy studies (pp. 79–98). Palgrave Macmillan.
166.
YoungM. D.LiableJ. (2000). White racism, anti-racism, and school leadership preparation. Journal of School Leadership, 10(5), 374–415.
