Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

School discipline is a salient challenge in K–12 districts nationwide. The majority of prior studies have focused on suspensions with relatively little attention paid to other forms of exclusionary discipline. This mixed-methods study provides a descriptive analysis of overlooked disciplinary consequences, namely, assignment to alternative schools, expulsions, and referrals to hearing. The findings from the quantitative analysis indicate that possession of drugs, student and staff assault, and weapons-related incidents account for the majority of infractions leading to the most severe forms of exclusionary discipline. Black male students account for the largest proportion of students receiving the harshest exclusionary disciplinary consequences. The findings from the qualitative analysis reveal several challenges that policymakers in urban districts navigate regarding alternative schools, including (a) staffing and the development of professional capacity, (b) the length of the school day, (c) transportation, and (d) the choice between in-district versus third-party operation of alternative schools.

Keywords

alternative schools school discipline student discipline expulsions referrals to hearing exclusionary discipline urban districts urban education educational equity educational policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2013). Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics, 112(5), 1206–1209. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3932

American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? American Psychological Association, 63(9), 852–862.

Anderson

K. P.

Ritter

G. W.

(2017). Disparate use of exclusionary discipline: Evidence on inequities in school discipline from a U.S. state. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(49), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2787

Anderson

K. P.

Ritter

G. W.

(2018). Do school discipline policies treat students fairly? Evidence from Arkansas. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818802085

Anyon

Gregory

Stone

S. I.

Farrar

Jenson

J. M.

McQueen

. . . Simmons

(2016). Restorative interventions and school discipline sanctions in a large urban school district. American Education Research Journal, 53(6), 1663–1697.

Anyon

Jenson

Altschul

Farrar

McQueen

Greer

. . . Simmons

(2014). The persistent effect of race and the promise of alternatives to suspension in school discipline outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.025

Aron

L. Y.

(2006). An overview of alternative education. The Urban Institute.

Atiles

J. T.

Gresham

T. M.

Washburn

(2017). Values and beliefs regarding discipline practices: How school culture impacts teacher responses to student misbehavior. Educational Research Quarterly, 40(3), 3–24.

Barrett

McEachin

Mills

J. N.

Valent

(2017). Disparities in students discipline by race and family income [Technical report]. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/010418-Barrett-McEachin-Mills-Valant-Disparities-in-Student-Discipline-by-Race-and-Family-Income.pdf

10.

Bowen

G. A.

(2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

11.

Bradshaw

C. P.

Mitchell

M. M.

O’Brennan

L. M.

Leaf

P. J.

(2010). Multilevel exploration of factors contributing to the overrepresentation of Black students in office disciplinary referrals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018450

12.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

13.

Brewer

(1998, April). Statewide evaluation of North Carolina’s Alternative Learning Programs (ALPs): Implications for policy and practice [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association 1998 Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, United States.

14.

Burch

Heinrich

C. J.

(2015). Mixed methods for policy research and program evaluation. SAGE.

15.

Carver

P. R.

Lewis

Tice

(2010). Alternative schools and programs for public school students at risk of educational failure: 2007–08 first look. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010026.pdf

16.

Chu

E. M.

Ready

D. D.

(2018). Exclusion and urban public high schools: Short- and long-term consequences of school suspensions. American Journal of Education, 124(4), 479–509.

17.

DeWalt

K. M.

DeWalt

B. R.

(2002). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworker. AltaMira Press.

18.

Downe-Wamboldt

(1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Healthcare Women International, 13(3), 313–321.

19.

Elo

Kyngas

(2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115.

20.

Encyclopedia of Children’s Health. (n.d.). Alternative schools. http://www.healthofchildren.com/A/Alternative-School.html

21.

Fowler

D. F.

(2007). Texas’ school-to-prison pipeline: Dropout to incarceration: The impact of school discipline and zero tolerance. Texas Appleseed. https://www.scribd.com/document/47927419/Texas-School-to-Prison-Pipeline-The-Impact-of-School-Discipline-and-Zero-Tolerance-Texas-Appleseed-2007

22.

Fresques

Vogell

Pierce

(2017). Methodology: How we analyzed alternative schools data. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/alternative-schools-methodology

23.

Gjelten

E. A.

(2018). Education law: What are zero tolerance policies in schools? https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/research/education-law/whats-a-zero-tolerance-policy.html

24.

Gregory

Skiba

R. J.

Noguera

P. A.

(2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357621

25.

Hadderman

(2002). Alternative schools: Trends and issues. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

26.

Hill

(2007). Improving alternative education in California. Legislative Analyst’s Office. http://www.lao.ca.gov/2007/alternative_educ/alt_ed_020707.aspx

27.

Hwang

(2018). Suspensions and achievement: Varying links by type, frequency, and subgroup. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18779579

28.

Jain

Bassey

Brown

M. A.

Preety

(2014). Restorative justice in Oakland schools: Implementation and impacts. Oakland Unified School District; Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education.

29.

Jimenez

Rothman

Roth

Sargrad

(2018, June 15). Blueprint for accountability systems for alternative high schools. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2018/06/15/452011/blueprint-accountability-systems-alternative-high-schools/

30.

Johnson

R. B.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

31.

Justice for Children and Youth. (2013). Suspension vs. expulsion. http://jfcy.org/en/rights/expulsions/

32.

Katsiyannis

Williams

(1998). A national survey of state initiatives on alternative education. Remedial & Special Education, 19(5), 276–284.

33.

Kawulich

B. B.

(2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 43.

34.

Kellmayer

(1995). Educating chronically disruptive and disaffected high school students. NASSP Bulletin, 79(567), 82–87.

35.

Kinsler

(2011). Understanding the Black–White school discipline gap. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1370–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.004

36.

Koetke

(1999). One size does not fit all. Technos Quarterly, 8(2), 20–26.

37.

Lacoe

Steinberg

M. P.

(2018). Do suspensions affect student outcomes? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 34–62.

38.

Lange

C. M.

Sletten

S. J.

(2002). Alternative education: A brief history and research synthesis. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. http://alternatyvusisugdymas.lt/uploads/2009/12/alternative_ed_history.pdf

39.

Lehr

C. A.

Lange

C. M.

(2003). Policy research brief: Alternative schools and the students they serve: Perceptions of state directors of special education. Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.

40.

Lehr

C. A.

Lanners

E. J.

Lange

C. M.

(2003). Alternative schools: Policy and legislation across the United States. Institute of Community Integration.

41.

Lehr

C. A.

Tan

C. S.

Ysseldyke

(2009). Alternative schools: A synthesis of state-level policy and research. Remedial and Special Education, 30(1), 19–32.

42.

Lindsay

C. A.

Hart

C. M. D.

(2017). Exposure to same-race teachers and student disciplinary outcomes for Black students in North Carolina. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 39(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717693109

43.

Losen

D. J.

Hodson

Keith

M. A.

II Morrison

Belway

(2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap? The Civil Rights Project, University of California.

44.

Losen

Whitaker

(2018). 11 million days lost: Race, discipline, and safety at U.S public schools. The Center of Civil Rights Remedies. https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/final_11-million-days_ucla_aclu.pdf

45.

Martinez

McMahon

S. D.

Treger

(2015). Individual and school-level predictors of student office disciplinary referrals. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426615588289

46.

Medler

(2018). It’s time to study alternative school. Center for Reinventing Public Education. https://www.crpe.org/thelens/time-study-alternative-schools

47.

Milner

H. R

IV . (2012). But what is urban education?. Urban Education, 47(3), 556–561.

48.

Morgan

D. L.

(1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121.

49.

Morris

E. W.

Perry

B. L.

(2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv026

50.

Morrison

G. M.

Anthony

Storino

M. H.

Cheng

J. J.

Furlong

M. J.

Morrison

R. L.

(2001). School expulsion as a process and an event: Before and after effects on children at risk for school discipline. In Skiba

R. J.

Noam

G. G.

(Eds.), Zero tolerance: Can suspension and expulsion keep school safe (pp. 45–71). Jossey-Bass.

51.

National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Violence and discipline problems in the U.S. public schools 1996–97. http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/98030/index.asp?sectionid=5

52.

National Dropout Prevention Center/Network at Clemson University. (n.d.). Alternative schooling. http://dropoutprevention.org/effective-strategies/alternative-schooling/

53.

Noltemeyer

A. L.

Ward

R. M.

Mcloughlin

(2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-14-0008.1

54.

Office of Civil Rights. (2018). 2015–2016 civil rights data collection: School climate and safety. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/school-climate-and-safety.pdf

55.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Leech

N. L.

(2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474–498.

56.

Osher

Poirier

Jarjoura

Brown

Kendziora

(2015). Avoid simple solutions and quick fixes: Lessons learned from a comprehensive district-wide approach to improve conditions for learning. In Losen

D. J.

(Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 192–206). Teachers College Press.

57.

Phillips

E. K.

(2019). The Make-or-break Year: Solving the Dropout Crisis One Ninth Grader at a Time. The New Press.

58.

Raywid

M. A.

(1981). The first decade of public school alternatives. The Phi Delta Kappan, 62(8), 551–553.

59.

Raywid

M. A.

(1994). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 26–31.

60.

Reimer

M. S.

Cash

(2003). Alternative schools: Best practices for development and evaluation. National Dropout Prevention Center.

61.

Reyes

(2006). Discipline, achievement, and race: Is zero tolerance the answer? Rowman & Littlefield.

62.

Sattin-Bajaj

Jennings

J. L.

Corcoran

S. P.

Baker-Smith

E. C.

Hailey

(2018). Surviving at the street level: How counselors’ implementation of school choice policy shapes students’ high school destinations. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 46–71.

63.

Skiba

R. J.

(2015). Interventions to address racial/ethnic disparities in school discipline: Can systems reform be race-neutral? In Bangs

Davis

L. E.

(Eds.), Race and social problems: Restructuring inequality (pp. 107–124). Springer Science + Business Media.

64.

Skiba

R. J.

Arredondo

M. I.

Williams

N. T.

(2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity and Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564.

65.

Skiba

R. J.

Chung

C. G.

Trachok

Baker

T. L.

Sheya

Hughes

R. L.

(2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214541670

66.

Skiba

R. J.

Horner

R. H.

Chung

C.-G.

Rausch

M. K.

May

S. L.

Tobin

T. J.

(2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–107.

67.

Skiba

R. J.

Mediratta

Rausch

M. K.

(2016). Inequality in school discipline : Research and practice to reduce disparities. Palgrave Macmillan.

68.

Skiba

R. J.

Rausch

M. K.

(2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In Evertson

C. M.

Weinstein

C. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063–1089). Lawrence Erlbaum.

69.

Smith

T. M.

Cannata

Haynes

K. T.

(2016). Reconciling data from different sources: Practical realities of using mixed methods to identify effective high school practices. Teachers College Record, 118(17), 1–34.

70.

Sparker

(2005). Narrative analysis: Exploring the what’s and how’s of personal stories. In Holloway

(Ed.), Qualitative research in health care (1st ed., pp. 191–208). Open University Press.

71.

Swanson

E. H.

Erickson

Ritter

G. W.

(2019). Examining the impacts of middle school disciplinary policies on ninth-grade retention. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819843600

72.

Theriot

M. T.

Orme

J. G.

(2016). School resource officers and students’ feelings of safety at school. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014564472

73.

Townsend

B. L.

(2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 381–391.

74.

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2019). Beyond suspensions: Examining school discipline policies and connections to the school-to-prison pipeline for students of color with disabilities. https://www.usccr.gov/pubs/2019/07-23-Beyond-Suspensions.pdf

75.

Vogell

(2017). How students get banished to alternative schools. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-students-get-banished-to-alternative-schools

76.

Vogell

Fresques

(2017). Alternative education: Using charter schools to hide dropouts and game the system. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/alternative-education-using-charter-schools-hide-dropouts-and-game-system

77.

Weber

R. P.

(1990). Basic content analysis. SAGE.

78.

Welsh

R. O.

(2018). Student mobility, segregation and achievement gaps: Evidence from Clark County, Nevada. Urban Education, 53(1), 55–85.

79.

Welsh

R. O.

(2019). Intra-district student mobility, school discipline and gender: Evidence from Clark County, Nevada. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1217–1244.

80.

Welsh

R. O.

Little

(2018a). Caste and control in schools: A systematic review of the pathways, rates, and correlates of exclusion due to school discipline. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.031

81.

Welsh

R. O.

Little

(2018b). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791582

82.

Welsh

R. O.

Swain

(2020). (Re) defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher. Advance online publication.

83.

Wilkerson

Afacan

Perzigian

Justin

Lequia

(2016). Behavior-focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 81–94.

84.

Wilkerson

K. L.

Afacan

Yan

Justin

Datar

S. D.

(2016). Academic remediation-focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(2), 67–77.

85.

Witkin

B. R.

Altschuld

J. W.

(1995). Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide. SAGE.

86.

Young

(1990). Public alternative education. Teachers College Press.

Overlooked Exclusionary Discipline: Examining Placement in Alternative Schools,Expulsions,and Referrals to Hearing in an Urban District

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References