Generally, educational studies do not problematize the definition of urban education or examine the positionality of sites along a spectrum of urban districts and schools. This study addresses the definitional gap by (a) examining the conceptualization of urban education through an integrative review of prior definitional research and (b) exploring how an urban district may be defined in empirical terms. Our findings indicate six categories are typically used to define urban education: (a) population/location/geography, (b) enrollment, (c) demographic composition of students, (d) resources in schools, (e) disparities and educational inequality, and (f) social and economic context. The results indicate that deficit-oriented language permeates prevailing definitions of urban education and that large-city-centered conceptualizations of urban education may overlook a substantial number of smaller districts with similar levels of educational inequality and diversity.
BellowsL. (2018). Immigration enforcement and student achievement: The negative spillover of secure communities. Retrieved from Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis: https://stanford.io/2RLa4wk
2.
BreaultD. A.AllenL. A. (2008). Urban education: A handbook for educators and parents. Westport, CT: Praeger.
3.
BuendíaE. (2011). Reconsidering the urban in urban education: Interdisciplinary conversations. Urban Review, 43(1), 1–21.
4.
BuendíaE.AresN. (2006). Geographies of difference: The social production of the east side, west side, and central city school (intersections in communications and culture). New York: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
5.
CandipanJ. (2019). Neighbourhood change and the neighbourhood-school gap. Urban Studies, 56(15), 3308–3333. doi:10.1177/0042098018819075
6.
ChouV.TozerS. (2008). What’s urban got to do with it? Meanings of “urban” in urban preparation and development. In PetermannF. P. (Ed.), Partnering to prepare urban teachers: A call to activism (pp. 1–20). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
7.
Council of the Great City Schools. (2013). Fact book. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (2014). What can PISA tell us about U.S. education policy?New England Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), 1–14, Article 4.
9.
DonnellK. (2010). Beyond the deficit paradigm: An ecological orientation to thriving urban schools. In CanestrariA. S.MarloweB. A. (Eds.), Educational foundations: An anthology of critical readings (pp. 161–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
GadsdenV. L.Dixon-RománE. J. (2017). “Urban” schooling and “urban” families: The role of context and place. Urban Education, 52(4), 431–459.
11.
GallagherM.ZhangS.ComeyJ. (2013). Moving to educational opportunity: A housing demonstration to improve school outcomes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
HaymesS. N. (1995). Race, culture, and the city: A pedagogy for Black urban struggle. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14.
HopsonR. K.GreeneJ. C.BledsoeK. L.VillegasT. M.BrownT. A. (2007). A vision of urban educational evaluation. In PinkW. T.NoblitG. W. (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 893–914). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
15.
HorngE. (2005). Poor working conditions make urban schools hard-to-staff (Policy Brief). Los Angeles, CA: University of California All Campus Consortium on Research for Diversity. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0269b641
IrbyD. J. (2015). Urban is floating face down in the mainstream: Using hip-hop-based education research to resurrect “the urban” in urban education. Urban Education, 50(1), 7–30.
18.
JacobsK. B. (2015). “I want to see real urban schools”: Teacher learners’ discourse and discussion of urban-based field experiences. Perspectives on Urban Education, 12(1), 18–37.
19.
KelleyR. D. G. (1997). Yo’ mama’s disfunktional!: Fighting the cultural wars in urban America. Beacon Press.
20.
KincheloeJ. L. (2010). Why a book on urban education? In SteinbergS. R.KincheloeJ. L. (Eds.), 19 urban questions: Teaching in the city (pp. 1–25). New York: Peter Lang.
21.
KneeboneE.GarrE. (2010). The suburbanization of poverty. Brookings Institute.
22.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
23.
LippmanL.BurnsS.McArthurE. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty—Executive summary. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24.
MatskoK. K.HammernessK. (2014). Unpacking the “urban” in urban teacher education: Making a case for context-specific preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 128–144.
25.
Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).
26.
MilnerH. R.IV. (2006). Preservice teachers’ learning about cultural and racial diversity: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 41(4), 343–375.
27.
MilnerH. R.IV. (2012a). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47(3), 556–561.
28.
MilnerH. R. (2012b). Understanding urban education from the outside in and inside out. Urban Education, 47(6), 1019–1024.
29.
MilnerH. R.IVLomoteyK. ( Eds.) (2014). Handbook of urban education. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
MilnerH. R.IVMurrayI.FarindeA.Delale-O’ConnorL. (2015). Outside of school matters: What we need to know in urban environments. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(4), 529–548.
NogueraP. A. (1996). Confronting the urban in urban school reform. Urban Review, 28(1), 1–19.
33.
NogueraP. A. (2003). The trouble with Black boys: The role and influence of environmental and cultural factors on the academic performance of African American males. Urban Education, 38, 431–459.
34.
NogueraP. (2014). Urban schools and the Black male “challenge.” In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 114–128). New York: Routledge.
35.
NogueraP. A. (2017). Introduction to “Racial inequality and education: Patterns and prospects for the future.”Educational Forum, 81(2), 129–135.
36.
PearmanF. A.SwainW. A. (2017). School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 90(3), 213–235.
37.
PopkewitzT. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
ReardonS. F. (2019). Educational opportunity in early and middle childhood: Using full population administrative data to study variation by place and age. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Science, 5(2), 40–68. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.2.03
40.
ReardonS. F.HoA. D.ShearB. R.FahleE. M.KalogridesD.DiSalvoR. (2018). Stanford Education Data Archive (Version 2.1). Retrieved from http://purl.stanford.edu/db586ns4974
41.
ReardonS. F.KalogridesD.ShoresK. (2018). The geography of racial/ethnic test score gaps (CEPA Working Paper No. 16-10). Retrieved from Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis: http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp16-10
42.
RuryJ.MirelJ. (1997). The political economy of urban education. Review of Research in Education, 22, 49–110.
43.
SchafferC. L.WhiteM.BrownC. M. (2018). A tale of three cities: Defining urban schools within the context of varied geographic areas. Education and Urban Society, 50(6), 507–523.
44.
SteinbergS. R.KincheloeJ. L. (Eds.). (2004). 19 urban questions: Teaching in the city. New York: Peter Lang.
45.
StoneD. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
WellsA. S. (2014). Seeing past the “colorblind” myth of education policy: Addressing racial and ethnic inequality and supporting culturally diverse schools. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
50.
WhiteM.BrownC. M.ViatorM. G.ByrneL. L.RicchezzaL. C. (2017). Transforming perceptions of urban education: Lessons from Rowan University’s urban teacher academy. Educational Forum, 81(1), 18–34.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
