Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This research investigates whether teachers’ unions influence student academic achievement in Southern states that prohibit collective bargaining. Our data are from the School and Staffing Survey and the Stanford Education Data Archive. We measure the strength of teachers’ unions by union membership rate and meet-and-confer status of a district and employ a multilevel mixed-effects model to control for unobservable common characteristics of districts within each state. We find that teachers’ unions have a significantly positive association with student test scores, in both math and English, particularly for Hispanic and Black students. This positive link of unions with math is concentrated on the low- and mid-socioeconomic status (SES) districts but is detected across all SES for English.

Keywords

teachers’ unions collective bargaining meet-and-confer student achievement test scores

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonucci

(2017, February 22). Analysis: The NEA’s 5 financially shakiest states. The 74. https://www.the74million.org/article/analysis-the-neas-5-financially-shakiest-states/

Associated Press. (2014, July 1). The AEA, Alabama’s teacher group, loses main funding source. https://www.al.com/news/2014/07/the_aea_alabamas_teacher_group.html

Baron

E. J.

(2018). The effect of teachers’ unions on student achievement in the short run: Evidence from Wisconsin’s Act 10. Economics of Education Review, 67, 40–57.

Carini

R. M.

(2002). Chapter 10: Teacher unions and student achievement. In A. Molnar et al. School reform proposals: The research evidence. https://nepc.info/node/308

Carini

R. M.

Powell

Steelman

L. C.

(2000). Do teacher unions hinder educational performance? Lessons learned from state SAT and ACT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 70(4), 437–467.

Choi

Chung

I. H.

(2016). Voice effects of public sector unions on turnover: Evidence from teacher contracts. Public Personnel Management, 45(2), 213–233.

Eberts

R. W.

Stone

J. A.

(1984). Unions and public schools: The effect of collective bargaining on American education. Lexington Books.

Eberts

R. W.

Stone

J. A.

(1987). Teacher unions and the productivity of public schools. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 40(3), 354–363.

Fahle

E. M.

Shear

B. R.

Kalogrides

Reardon

S. F.

Disalvo

A. D.

(2018). Stanford education data archive—Technical documentation (v. 2.1). Center for Education Policy Analysis, Stanford University.

10.

Farber

(1983). The determination of the union status of workers. Econometrica, 51(5), 1417–1437.

11.

Figlio

(1997). Did the “tax revolt” reduce school performance? Journal of Public Economics, 65(3), 245–269.

12.

Freeman

R. B.

(2005). What do unions do? Journal of Labor Research, 26(4), 641–668.

13.

Freeman

R. B.

Han

E. S.

(2013). Public sector unionism without collective bargaining [Paper presentation]. AEA Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, United States.

14.

Freeman

R. B.

Medoff

J. L.

(1979). The two faces of unionism. The Public Interest 57, 69–93.

15.

Freeman

R. B.

Medoff

J. L.

(1984). What do unions do? Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 38(2), 244–263.

16.

Gius

. (2013). Unions, Right-to-Work Laws, and Job Satisfaction in the Teaching Profession. New York Economic Review, 44(1), 20–31.

17.

Grimes

P. W.

C. A.

(1991). Collective bargaining, teachers, and student achievement. Journal of Labor Research, 12(2), 99–109.

18.

Hammer

T. H.

Avgar

(2005). The impact of unions on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover. Journal of Labor Research, 26(2), 241–266.

19.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354.

20.

Hartman

W. T.

(1994). District spending disparities revised. Journal of Education Finance, 20(1), 88–106.

21.

Hirsch

B. T.

Macpherson

D. A.

Winters

J. V.

(2011). Teacher salaries, state collective bargaining laws, and union coverage. Association for Education Finance and Policy.

22.

Hoxby

C. M.

(1996). How teachers’ unions affect education production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 671–718.

23.

Kleiner

M. M.

Petree

D. L.

(1988). Unionism and licensing of public school teachers: Impact on wages and educational output. In Freeman

R. B.

Ichniowski

(Eds.), When public sector workers organize. University of Chicago Press.

24.

Kurth

M. M.

(1987). Teachers’ unions and excellence in education: An analysis of the decline in SAT scores. Journal of Labor Research, 8(4), 351–367.

25.

Lewin

(2005). Unionism and employment conflict resolution: Rethinking collective voice and its consequences [SYMPOSIUM: PART IV- What Do Unions Do? A Twenty-Year Perspective]. Journal of Labor Research, 26(2), 209–231.

26.

Lindy

B. A.

(2011). The impact of teacher collective bargaining laws on student achievement: Evidence from a New Mexico natural experiment. Yale Law Journal, 120(5), 1130–1191.

27.

Loeb

Page

M. E.

(2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 393–408.

28.

Lott

Kenny

L. W.

(2013). State teacher union strength and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 35, 93–103.

29.

Lovenheim

(2009). The effect of teachers’ unions on education production: Evidence from union election certifications in three Midwestern states. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 525–587.

30.

MacPhail-Wilcox

King

R. A.

(1986). Production functions revisited in the context of educational reform. Journal of Education Finance, 12(2), 191–222.

31.

Marianno

B. D.

Kilbride

Theobald

Strunk

K. O.

Cowen

J. M.

Goldhaber

(2018). Cut from the same cloth? Comparing urban district CBAs within states and across the United States. Educational Policy, 32(2), 334–359.

32.

Marianno

B. D.

Strunk

K. O.

(2018). The bad end of the bargain? Revisiting the relationship between collective bargaining agreements and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 65, 93–106.

33.

Matsudaira

J. D.

Patterson

R. W.

(2017). Teachers’ unions and school performance: Evidence from California charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 61, 35–50.

34.

Milkman

(1997). Teachers’ unions, productivity, and minority student achievement. Journal of Labor Research, 18(1), 137–150.

35.

Moe

(2009). Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 156–174.

36.

Moe

(2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Brookings Institution Press.

37.

National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2018). Unionized charter schools, 2016-17. https://www.publiccharters.org/sites/default/files/documents/2018-02/Unionized%20Charter%20Schools%202016-17_0.pdf

38.

Nelson

F. H.

Rosen

Powell

(1996). Are teachers’ unions hurting American Education? A state-by-state analysis of the impact of collective bargaining among teachers on student performance. Institute for Wisconsin’s Future.

39.

Rosenberg

Silva

(2012). Trending toward reform: Teachers speak on unions and the future of the profession. Education sector. www.educationsector.org

40.

Steelman

L. C.

Powell

Carini

R. M.

(2000). Do teacher unions hinder educational performance? Lessons learned from State SAT and ACT Scores. Harvard Educational Review, 70(4), 437–466.

41.

Strunk

K. O.

(2011). Are teachers’ unions really to blame? Collective bargaining agreements and their relationships with district resource allocation and student performance in California. Education Finance and Policy, 6(3), 354–398.

42.

Strunk

K. O.

McEachin

(2011). Accountability under constraint: The relationship Between collective bargaining agreements and California schools’ and districts’ Performance under No Child Left Behind. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 871–903.

43.

Turner

Camilli

Kroc

Hoover

(1986). Policy strategies, teacher salary incentive and student achievement: An explanatory model. Educational Researcher, 15(3), 5–11.

44.

Vachon

T. E.

J. K.

(2015). Bargaining for success: Examining the relationship between teacher unions and student achievement. Sociological Forum, 30(2), 391–414.

45.

Verstegen

D. A.

King

R. A.

(1998). The relationship between school spending and student achievement: A review and analysis of 35 years of production function research. Journal of Education Finance, 24(2), 243–262.

46.

Zigarelli

M. A.

(1994). The linkages between teacher unions and student achievement. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 23(4), 299–319.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.33 MB

Teachers’ Unions: Engaging Teachers and Improving Student Achievement in States That Prohibit Collective Bargaining

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material