In many cases, state systems of higher education are not only challenged to address decreasing state budgets but are also asked to increase student retention and other measures of student success. The increased use of contingent faculty may help economically, but this trend may have unintended consequences. This research used logistic regression methods to examine six institutions within a public higher education system for the effects of contingent faculty use on first-year student retention. A thorough examination of other traditional variables used in retention studies is also provided. Results are reported by institutional type via Carnegie classification. Most notably, high levels of exposure to part-time faculty in the first year of college are consistently found to negatively affect student retention to the second year. These findings have implications for both policy and practice in the use of contingent faculty across institutional types.
American Association of University Professors. ( 2006). AAUP contingent faculty index. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/F05FF88E-B2A8-4052-8373-AF0FDAE060AC/0/ConsequencesAnIncreasinglyContingentFaculty.pdf.
2.
American Federation of Teachers. (2009). American academic: The state of the higher education workforce 1997-2007. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Ashburn, E. ( 2006, October 6). The few, the proud, the professors [electornic version]. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v53/i07/07a01001.htm
4.
Baldwin, R.G., & Chronister, J.L. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Bean, J.P. ( 1990). Why students leave: Insights from research. In D. Hossler, & J. P. Bean (Eds.), The strategic management of college enrollments . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Benjamin, E. ( 2002). How over reliance upon contingent appointments diminishes faculty involvement in student learning. Peer Review, 5(1), 4-10.
7.
Benjamin, E. ( 2003). Reappraisal and implications for policy and research . New Directions for Higher Education, 123, 79-113.
8.
Bettinger, E., & Long, B.T. ( 2004). The increasing use of adjunct instructors at public institutions: Are we hurting students? In. R. E. Ehrenberg (Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
Bettinger, E., & Long, B.T. ( 2006). Do college instructors matter? The effects of adjuncts and graduate assistants on students’ interests and success (Working Paper #10370). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. ( 2008). An annual report on the university system’s contributions to Georgia. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from http://www.usg.edu/strategicplan/docs/strategic_plan2008.pdf.
11.
Borjas, G. ( 2000). Foreign-born teaching assistants and the academic performance of undergraduates (Working Paper #7635). Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
Bowen, H.R. ( 1997). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Braxton, J.M., Bray, N.J., & Berger, J.B. ( 2000). Faculty teaching skills and their influence on the college student departure process. Journal of College Student Development , 41, 215-227.
14.
Buck, J. ( 2001). The president’s report: Successes, setbacks, and contingent labor. Academe, 87(5), 18-26.
15.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. ( 2006). Classification descriptions. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index.asp?key=785.
16.
Cataldi, E.F., Fahimi, M., Bradburn, E.M., & Zimbler, L. ( 2005). 2004 national study of post-secondary faculty (NSOPF:04) report on faculty and instructional staff in fall (NCES Report No. 2005-172). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17.
College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (2001) National faculty salary survey. Executive summary. Available from http://www.cupahr.org/cbsurvey/00-01ExecSum/00-01NFSSExSum-Public.pdf .
18.
Conley, V.M., Leslie, D.W., & Zimbler, L.J. ( 2002). Part-time instructional faculty and staff: Who they are, what they do, and what they think. (NCES 2002163). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
19.
Cotten, S.R., & Wilson, B. ( 2006). Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants . Higher Education, 51, 487-519.
20.
Cullen, J.B., Jacob, B.A., & Levitt, S.D. ( 2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics , 89, 729-760.
21.
Eagan, M.K., & Jaeger, A.J. ( 2008). Closing the gate: Contingent faculty in gatekeeper courses . In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), The role of the classroom in college student persistence: New directions for teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Eagan, M.K., & Jaeger, A.J. ( 2009). Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on community college transfer. Research in Higher Education, 50, 168-188.
23.
Endo, J.J., & Harpel, R. ( 1982). The effect of student-faculty interaction on students’ educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 16, 115-138.
24.
Gaff, J.G., & Gaff, S. ( 1981). Student-faculty relationships. In A. W. Chickering & Associates (Eds.), The modern American college (pp. 642-656). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Gappa, J.M. ( 1984). Part-time faculty: Higher education at a crossroads (ASHE Report No. 3). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
26.
Gappa, J.M., & Leslie, D.W. ( 1993). The invisible faculty: Improving the status of part-timers in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Groen, J.A., & White, M.J. ( 2003). In-state versus out-of-state students: The divergence of interest between public universities and state governments (Working Paper #9603). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
Haeger, J.D. ( 1998). Part-time faculty, quality programs, and economic realities . In D. W. Leslie (Ed.), The growing use of part-time faculty: Understanding causes and effects (pp. 81-88). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Halpin, R. ( 1990). An application of the Tinto model to the analysis of freshman persistence in a community college. Community College Review, 17, 22-32.
30.
Harrington, C., & Schibik, T. ( 2004). Caveat emptor: Is there a relationship between part-time faculty utilization and student learning outcomes and retention?AIR Professional File, No. 91. Tallahassee, FL: Association of Institutional Research .
31.
Jaeger, A.J., & Eagan, M.K. ( 2009). Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on associate’s degree completion. Community College Review, 36, 167-194.
32.
Jaeger, A.J., & Hinz, D. ( 2008). The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshmen retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10, 265-286.
33.
Kehrberg, N., & Turpin, W.K. ( 2002, March). Impact of part-time faculty on freshman performance, satisfaction and retention. Paper presented at the meeting of the North Carolina Association for Institutional Research, Greensboro, NC.
34.
Keller, J. ( 2009, July 21). In California budget deal, bad news for colleges in 2010. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://chronicle.com/daily/2009/07/22372n.htm?rss .
35.
Kirshstein, R.J., Matheson, N., & Jing, Z. ( 1997). Instructional faculty and staff in higher education institutions: Fall 1987 and fall 1992 (NCES 97-470). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36.
Leslie, D.W. ( 1978). Employing part-time faculty (New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 18). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
37.
Leslie, D.W. ( 1998). The growing use of part-time faculty: Understanding causes and effects (New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 104). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Liu, X., & Zhang, L. ( 2007). What determines employment of part-time faculty in higher education institutions?Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute. Available from http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/.
39.
Mallette, B., & Cabrera, A. ( 1991). Determinants of withdrawal behavior: An exploratory study . Research in Higher Education, 32, 179-194.
40.
Milem, J., & Berger, J. ( 1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development , 38, 387-400.
41.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. ( 2006). Measuring up 2006. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from, http://measuringup.highereducation.org/ .
42.
Nora, A., Barlow, E., & Crisp, G. ( 2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year in college. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention (pp. 129-153). Westport, CT: Praeger.
43.
Norris, T. ( 1991). Nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants and student performance. Research in Higher Education, 58, 293-305.
44.
Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P. ( 1977). Patterns of student-faculty informal interaction beyond the classroom and voluntary freshman attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 48, 540-552.
45.
Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Reason, R.D. ( 2003). Student variables that predict retention: Recent research and new developments. NASPA Journal, 40, 172-191.
47.
Ronco, S., & Cahill, J. ( 2006). Does it matter who’s in the classroom? Effect of instructor type on student retention, achievement and satisfaction ( AIR Professional File, No. 100). Tallahassee, FL: Association of Institutional Research .
48.
Schuster, J.H. ( 2003). The faculty makeover: What does it mean for students? ( Directions for Higher Education, No. 123). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
Schuster, J.H., & Finkelstein, M.J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50.
Seidman, A. ( 2005). College student retention. Westport, CT: Praeger.
51.
Terenzini, P.T., & Reason, R.D. ( 2005, November). Parsing the first year of college: A conceptual framework for studying college impacts. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia.
52.
Thompson, K. ( 2003). Contingent faculty and student learning: Welcome to the strativersity (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 123). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Titus, M.A. ( 2005). Understanding the influence of the financial context of institutions on student persistence at four-year colleges and universities . The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 353-375.
54.
Umbach, P.D. ( 2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education , 30, 91-124.
55.
University of North Carolina Tomorrow Commission. ( 2007). Executive summary. Retrieved June 1, 2009 , from http://www.northcarolina.edu/nctomorrow/execsummary.pdf .
