Using a critical policy analysis framework, this article examines the discursive foundation of the most recent era of educational reform. The purpose of this article is to provide educational practitioners and scholars with a better understanding of how neoliberal and globalized discourse may codetermine what practitioners—the readers and implementers of policy—are offered as legitimate policy solutions for public schools. The findings of this article examine the ideological foundations of the educational policies put forward by the Obama/Duncan and Trump/DeVos administrations. Specifically, this article shows how, over the past 40 years, two historically related elements determined the purposes of educational policy: (a) the continual threat of economic instability that began in the 1970s as the interconnectedness of global economics became apparent, and (b) the subsequent institutionalization of economic policies intended to secure the health of the economy and establish the United States as a dominant force in the global capitalist marketplace.
AppleM. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1-2), 11-29.
3.
AppleM. W. (2015). Reflections on the educational crisis and the tasks of the critical scholar/activist. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk og Kritikk, 1, 1-17.
4.
BallS. (2008). The education debate. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
5.
BarnesF. (2006). Rebel-in-chief: Inside the bold and controversial presidency of George W. Bush. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
6.
BlumenthalS. (2003). The Clinton wars. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
7.
BrownW. (2006). Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BushG. W. (1999). A charge to keep: My journey to the White House. New York, NY: William Morrow.
12.
CampbellC.RockmanB. A. (2000). The Clinton legacy. New York, NY: Seven Bridges Press.
13.
CanovaT. A.TurgeonE. L. (2004). The Bush stagnation: Its etiology, and a Keynesian prescription. In HimelfarbR.PerottiR. (Eds.), Principle over politics: The domestic policy of the George H. W. Bush presidency (pp. 77-88). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
14.
CarpenterB. W. (2017). Examining the theater of “listening” & “learning.” In Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 215-242). Springer.
15.
CarpenterB. W.DiemS.YoungM. D. (2014). The influence of values and policy vocabularies on understandings of leadership effectiveness. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 1110-1133.
CohenE. S. (2001). The politics of globalization in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
21.
DeBrayE. H. (2006). Politics, ideology, and education: Federal policy during the Clinton and Bush administrations. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
FaircloughN. (2000). New Labour, new language?Psychology Press.
24.
Fiscal Year 2002 request for the Department of Education before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations, 107th Cong. (2001, May10) (statement of Roderick R. Paige). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2001/05/010510.html
25.
FischerF.ForesterJ. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
FriedmanM. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
27.
GilpinR. (2000). The challenge of global capitalism: The world economy in the 21st century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
GrahamJ. D. (2010). Bush on the home front: Domestic policy triumphs and setbacks. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29.
GreenspanA. (2008). The age of turbulence: Adventures in a new world. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
30.
HajerM. (2003). A frame in the fields: policymaking and the reinvention of politics. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, 88-110.
31.
HajerM. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
32.
HajerM.VersteegW. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 7(3), 175-184.
33.
HajerM. A.WagenaarH. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HallP. A. (2017). The comparative political economy of the ‘third way’. In Revival: The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy (2002) (pp. 31-58). Routledge.
35.
JenningsJ. F. J. (2000). Title I: Its legislative history and its promise. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 516-522.
36.
JenningsJ. F. (1998). Why national standards and tests? Politics and the quest for better schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
MannaP. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38.
McGuinnP. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
39.
MedhurstM. J. (Ed.). (2006). The rhetorical presidency of George H. W. Bush. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
40.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of2001, P. L. 107-110 (2002).
42.
NolanP. (2008). Capitalism and freedom: The contradictory character of globalisation. New York, NY: Anthem Press.
43.
QuinlanJ. P. (2011). The last economic superpower: The retreat of globalization, the end of American dominance, and what we can do about it. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
44.
QuirkP.CunionW. (2000). Clinton’s domestic policy: The lessons of a new democrat. In CampbellC.RockmanB. (Eds.), The Clinton legacy (pp. 200-225). New York, NY: Chatham House.
45.
RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46.
RivziF.LingardB. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
RodgersH. R. (2006). American poverty in a new era of reform. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
48.
RomanoF. (Ed.). (2006). Clinton and Blair: The political economy of the third way. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
VinovskisM. (2009). From a nation at risk to No Child Left Behind: National education goals and the creation of federal education policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50.
WilliamsonJ. (1990). The progress of policy reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
51.
WilliamsonJ. (2008). A short history of the Washington consensus. In SerraN.StiglitzJ. E. (Eds.), The Washington consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance (pp. 14-30). New York NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
WirtF. M.KirstM. W. (2005). The political dynamics of American education. Richmond: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
53.
WroeA.HerbertJ. (2009). Introduction: A tale of two terms. In WroeA.HerbertJ. (Eds.), Assessing the George W. Bush presidency: A tale of two terms (p. 292). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
54.
ZelizerJ. E. (2010). Jimmy Carter. New York, NY: Times Books.
