Pay-for-performance has become a state finance policy du jour for public postsecondary institutions. A total of 35 states currently distribute varying amounts of appropriations to colleges and universities based on outcome measures. This study uses a difference-in-differences quasi-experimental technique to assess the impact of performance-based funding on public 4-year Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). It also includes separate analyses on the older and newer models of performance funding throughout the United States. This study finds little evidence of a significant effect on improvement in baccalaureate degree attainment in public 4-year HBCUs that receive some apportionment of state appropriations through performance-based funding.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricists companion. Princeton University Press.
5.
AtheyS.ImbensG. W. (2002). Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica, 74, 431-497.
6.
BolandW.C.GasmanM. (2014). America’s Public HBCUs: A four state comparison considering institutional capacity and state funding priorities. Philadelphia: Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
7.
BolandW.C. (2016). “The Impact of Performance-Based Funding on Historically Black Colleges and Universities.” In Setting a New Agenda for Student Engagement and Retention in Historically Black Colleges and Universities. IGI Global.
8.
BogenschneiderK.CorbettT. J. (2011). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BurkeJ. C. (2005). Reinventing accountability. In BurkeJ. C. (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education (pp. 216-245). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
BurkeJ. C.MinassiansH. P. (2001). Linking resources to campus results: From fad to trend: The fifth annual survey. Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute.
11.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CarnevaleA. P.RoseS. J. (2015). The economy goes to college: The hidden promise of higher education in the post-industrial service economy. Washington, DC: Center on Education and the Workforce, Georgetown University.
13.
CavanaughJ. C.GarlandP. (2012). Performance funding in Pennsylvania. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(3), 34-39.
14.
ConradC.GasmanM. (2015). Educating a diverse nation: Lessons from Minority-Serving Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.ShadishW. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
DavisR. (1991). Social support networks and undergraduate student academic success related outcomes: A comparison of Black students on Black and White campuses. In AllenW.R.EppsE.G.HaniffN.Z. (Eds.), College in Black and White: African American students in predominantly White and in historically Black public universities (143-157). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
17.
DonaldS. G.LangK. (2007). Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 221-233.
18.
DoughertyK. J.NatowR. S. (2015). The politics of performance funding for higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
DoughertyK. J.NatowR. S.VegaB. E. (2012). Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the United States often do not persist. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1-41.
20.
DoughertyK. J.ReddyV. (2013). Performance funding for higher education: What are the mechanisms? What are the impacts? (ASHE higher education report). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
GasmanM.BaezB.TurnerC.S.V. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding Minority-Serving Institutions. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23.
GasmanM. (2010). Comprehensive funding approaches for historically black colleges and universities. Philadelphia: Penn Graduate School of Education.
24.
GasmanM.ConradC. (2013). Minority Serving Institutions: Educating all students. Philadelphia: Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
25.
HarnischT. L. (2011). Performance-based funding: A re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 1-12.
26.
HillmanN. (2016). Why performance-based college funding doesn’t work. The Century Foundation.
27.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.FryarA. H. (2015). Evaluating the impacts of “new” performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 501-519.
28.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.SponslerB. A. (2015). Public policy and higher education: Strategies for framing a research agenda. ASHE Higher Education Report, 41(2), 1-98.
29.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.GrossJ. P. K. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions?The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 826-857.
30.
HirtJ. B.StrayhornT. L.AmelinkC. T.BennettB. R. (2006). The nature of student affairs work at historically Black colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Development, 47(6), 661-676.
31.
HubbardS.M.StageF.K. (2009). Attitudes, perceptions, and preferences of faculty at Hispanic Serving and Predominately Black institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 270-289.
32.
ImbensG.WooldridgeJ. (2007). Difference-in-differences estimation. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper.
33.
JonesD. (2003). Aligning fiscal policies with state objectives. In Policies in sync: Appropriations, tuition, and financial aid for higher education. A compilation of selected papers. Boulder: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
34.
JonesT. (2014). Performance funding at MSIs: Considerations and possible measures for public minority-serving institutions. Atlanta, GA: Southern Education Foundation.
35.
JonesT. (2016). A historical mission in the accountability era: A public HBCU and state performance funding. Educational Policy, 30, 999-1041.
36.
KelchenR.StedrakL. J. (2016). Does performance-based funding affect colleges’ financial priorities?Journal of Education Finance, 41, 302-321.
37.
LeeM. J.KangJ. (2006). Identification for difference in differences with cross-section and panel data. Economics Letters, 92, 270-276.
38.
LiA. Y. (2017). Covet thy neighbor or “reverse policy diffusion”? State adoption of performance funding 2.0. Research in Higher Education, 58, 746-771.
39.
McLendonM. K.HearnJ. C. (2013). The resurgent interest in performance-based funding for higher education. Academe, 99, 25-30.
40.
McLendonM. K.HearnJ. C.DeatonR. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1-24.
41.
MeyerB. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 151-161.
42.
MinorJ. T. (2008). Contemporary HBCUs: Considering institutional capacity and state priorities (A research report). East Lansing: Department of Educational Administration, College of Education, Michigan State University.
43.
Mississippi Legislature. (2013). Mississippi’s compliance with the Ayers settlement agreement (Report #525). Mississippi Legislature, The Joint Committee on Performance Evaluation and Expenditure Review. Retrieved from http://www.peer.state.ms.us/525.html
44.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
PalmerR.GasmanM. (2008). “ It Takes a Village to Raise a Child”: The Role of Social Capital in Promoting Academic Success for African American Men at a Black College. Journal of College Student Development, 49(1), 52-70.
47.
PernaL. W.MilemJ.GeraldD.BaumE.RowanH.HutchensN. (2006). The status of equity for Black undergraduates in public higher education in the South: Still separate and unequal. Research in Higher Education, 47, 197-228.
48.
PernaL. W.FinneyJ. E. (2014). The Attainment Agenda: State Policy Leadership in Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
RabovskyT. M. (2012). Accountability in higher education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 675-700.
51.
RutherfordA.RabovskyT. (2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 185-208.
52.
St. ClairT.CookT. D. (2015). Difference-in-difference methods in public finance. National Tax Journal, 68, 319-338.
53.
SavG. T. (2010). Funding historically black colleges and universities: Progress toward equality?Journal of Education Finance, 35, 295-307.
54.
TandbergD. A.HillmanN. W. (2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications. The Journal of Education Finance, 39, 223-243.
55.
ThelinJ. R. (2004). A history of American higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
TitusM. A. (2009). The production of bachelor’s degrees and financial aspects of state higher education policy: A dynamic analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 439-468.
57.
UmbrichtM. R.FernandezF.OrtagusJ. C. (2017). An examination of the (un)intended consequences of performance funding in higher education. Educational Policy, 31, 643-673.
58.
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Fast facts: Historically Black colleges and universities. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=667
59.
VerbruggenS.ChristiaensJ.MilisK. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 5-32.
60.
WebberD. A.EhrenbergR. G. (2010). Do expenditures other than instructional expenditures affect graduation and persistence rates in American higher education?Economics of Education Review, 29, 947-958.
61.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Nelson Education.
62.
ZhangL.NessE. C. (2010). Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 143-165.
63.
ZumetaW.BrenemanD. W.CallanP. M.FinneyJ. E. (2012). Financing American higher education in the era of globalization. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
