In this article, we illustrate the relationships between Teach For America (TFA) and the deregulation of university-based teacher education programs. We use policy network analysis to create a visual representation of TFA’s connections to individuals, organizations, and private corporations who are working to shift the way teachers are prepared. In doing this, we identify human capital dependents, jurisdictional challengers, and legislative supporters who are working independently and collectively to shift our national focus from teacher education to teacher training for those teachers serving students in marginalized communities.
BerlinerD. C.GlassG. V. (Eds.). (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
BeyerL. (2007). Teacher education and the new professionalism: The case of the USA. In Freeman-MoirJ.ScottA. (Eds.), Shaping the future: Critical essays on teacher education (pp. 25-42). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
BrinsonD.BoastL.HasselB. C.KingslandN. (2012). New Orleans-style education reform: A guide for cities–lessons learned 2004-2010. Chapel Hill, NC: Public Impact.
12.
CapertonG.WhitmireR. (2012). The achievable dream. New York, NY: The College Board.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15.
Cochran-SmithM.PiazzaP.PowerC. (2013, January). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6-27.
16.
ColvinR. L. (2005). A new generation of philanthropists and their great ambitions. In HessF. M. (Ed.), With the best of intentions: How philanthropy is reshaping K-12 education (pp. 21-48). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Darling-HammondL. (1994). Who will speak for the children. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21-34.
19.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California’s public schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1936-1966.
20.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
DaviesJ. S. (2005). Local governance and the dialectics of hierarchy, Market and network. Policy Studies, 26, 311-335.
FooteD. (2009). Relentless pursuit: A year in the trenches with Teach for America. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
24.
FraserJ. W. (2007). Preparing America’s teachers: A history. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
FriedrichD. S. (2014). Global microlending in education reform: Enseñá por Argentina and the neoliberalization of the grassroots. Comparative Education Review, 58, 296-321.
26.
GattiL. (2014). Negotiating conflicting frames of experience: Learning to teach in an urban teacher residency. In EllisV.OrchardJ. (Eds.), Learning teaching from experience: Multiple perspectives and international contexts (pp. 207-222). London, England: Bloombury.
27.
GattiL. (2016). Towards a framework of resources for learning to teach: Rethinking US teacher preparation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
GolannJ. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88, 103-119.
29.
GoodmanJ. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher, 42, 89-96.
30.
GrabherG.PowellW. (2005). Networks: Critical studies in economic institutions (Vol. 1). Camberley, UK: Edward Elgar.
31.
GrossmanP.LoebS. (Eds.). (2008). Taking stock: An examination of alternative certification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
32.
HarveyD. (2006). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
IngersollR. M.SmithT. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.
41.
Knowledge Is Power Program. (2015). KIPP frequently asked questions. Available from www.kipp.org
42.
KoppW. (2001). One day, all children: The unlikely triumph of Teach For America and what I learned along the way. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
43.
KretchmarK.*SondelB.*FerarreJ. (2014). Mapping the terrain: Teach For America, charter school reform, and corporate sponsorship. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 742-759.
44.
KronholzJ. (2012). A new type of ed school. Education Next, 12(4). 42-49
45.
KumashiroK. (2010). Seeing the bigger picture: Troubling movements to end teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 56-65.
LahannR.ReaganE. M. (2011). Teach for America and the politics of progressive neoliberalism. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 7-27.
48.
LemovD. (2011). Teach like a champion: 49 Techniques that put students on the path to college (K-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
LyallK. C.SellK. R. (2006). The de facto privatization of American public higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38(1), 6-13.
51.
McShaneM. Q.HessF. M. (2014). The politics of entrepreneurship and innovation. In CooperB. S.CibulkaJ. G.FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
MehtaJ.TelesS. (2012). Jurisdictional politics: A new federal role in education. In HessF. M.KellyA. P. (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and the bully pulpit: Lessons from a half-century of federal efforts to improve America’s schools (pp. 197-216). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2011). Building better teachers: National review of teacher preparation programs. Retrieved from www.nctq.org/edschoolreports/national
PitzerH. K. (2010). “What’s best for kids” vs. teacher unions: How teach for America blames teacher unions for the problems of urban schools. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 17. 61-74
58.
ReckhowS.SnyderJ. W. (2014). The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics. Educational Researcher, 43, 186-195.
RhodesR. A. W. (2006). Policy network analysis. In MoranM.ReinM.GoodinR. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 423-445). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
SleeterC. E. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 1947-1957.
70.
SondelB. (2016). “No excuses” in New Orleans: The silent passivity of neoliberal schooling. The Educational Forum-Kappa Delta Pi, 80(2), 171-188.
71.
StitzleinS. M.WestC. K. (2014). New forms of teacher education: Connections to charter schools and their approaches. Democracy and Education, 22(2), 1-10.
TrujilloT.ScottJ. (2014). Superheroes and transformers: Rethinking Teach for America’s leadership models. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(8), 57-61.
77.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Our future, our teachers: The Obama administration’s plan for teacher education reform and improvement. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/teaching/our-future-our-teachers
78.
VillegasA. M.IrvineJ. J. (2010). Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments. The Urban Review, 42(3), 175-192.
79.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
80.
WeinerL. (2007). A lethal threat to U.S. teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 274-286.
81.
WhiteT. C. (2016). Teach For America’s paradoxical diversity initiative: Race, policy, and Black teacher displacement in urban schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 16.
82.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1544-1552.
83.
ZeichnerK. (2011). Improving teacher education is the United States. American Educational Research Association Essays. Retrieved from http://aera.net/2012Essays.htm
ZeichnerK.Pena-SandovalC. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the U.S: The role of the new schools venture fund. Teachers College Record, 117(6), 1-44.
