This study estimates the effect of zero tolerance disciplinary policies on racial disparities in school discipline in an urban district. Capitalizing on a natural experiment, the abrupt expansion of zero tolerance discipline policies in a mid-sized urban school district, the study demonstrates that Black students in the district were disproportionately affected, with an additional 70 Black students per year recommended for expulsion following the policy change. Furthermore, the study uses negative binomial regression discontinuity analysis to explore the effect of expanding zero tolerance on the proportion of days students are suspended. Following the policy change, the already sizeable difference in the proportion of days suspended between Black students and White students increased.
American Psychological Association. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852-862.
3.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BowditchC. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40 (4), 493 -509.
5.
CasellaR. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105 (5), 872-892.
6.
DeCuirJ. T.DixsonA. D. (2004). “So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there”: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26-31.
7.
DeMarisA. (2004). Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited response variables. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
8.
GillbornD. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 485-505.
9.
GregoryA.MoselyP. M. (2004). The discipline gap: Teachers’ views on the over-representation of African American students in the discipline system. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37, 18-30.
10.
GregoryA.SkibaR.NogueraP. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59-65.
11.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7-24.
McCarthyJ. D.HogeD. R. (1987). The social construction of school punishment: Racial disadvantage out of universalistic process. Social Forces, 65, 1101-1120.
14.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2012). America’s youth: Transitions to adulthood. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012026
17.
NicholsJ. D. (2004). An exploration of discipline and suspension data. The Journal of Negro Education, 73, 408-423.
18.
Raffaele MendezL. M.KnoffH. M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(1), 30-51.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review, 34, 317-342.
21.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In EvertsonC. M.WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063-1089). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
StataCorp (2011). Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
23.
SughrueJ. A. (2003). Zero tolerance for children: Two wrongs do not make a right. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 238-258.
24.
TownsendB. L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66, 381-391.
25.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1998) Violence and discipline problems in U.S. public schools: 1996-97, NCES 98-030, by HeavisideSheilaRowandCassandraWilliamsCatrinaFarrisElizabeth. Project Officers, BurnsShelleyMcArthur.EdithWashington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98030.pdf
