This article examines the convergence of two popular school improvement policies: instructional coaching and data-driven decision making (DDDM). Drawing on a mixed methods study of a statewide reading coach program in Florida middle schools, the article examines how coaches support DDDM and how this support relates to student and teacher outcomes. Authors find that although the majority of coaches spent time helping teachers analyze student data to guide instruction, data support was one among many coach activities. Estimates from models indicate that data analysis support, nevertheless, has a significant association with both perceived improvements in teaching and higher student achievement.
Black, P., & William, D. ( 1998). Assessment and classroom living. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
2.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Dugrid, P. ( 1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
3.
Brown, D., Reumann-Moore, R., Hugh, R., Christman, J.B., Riffer, M., du Plessis, P., et al. (2007). Making a difference: Year two report of the Pennsylvania high school coaching initiative. Philadelphia : Research for Action.
4.
Brown, D., Reumann-Moore, R., Hugh, R., du Plessis, P., & Christman, J.B. (2006). Promising inroads: Year one of the Pennsylvania high school coaching initiative. Philadelphia: Research for Action.
5.
Casserly, M.D. ( 2002). Beating the odds: A city-by-city analysis of student performance and achievement gaps on state assessments. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools, 2002.
6.
Celio, M.B., & Harvey, J. ( 2005). Buried treasure: Developing an effective management guide from mountains of educational data. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
7.
Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. ( 2005). Identifying and monitoring students’ learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 309-332.
8.
Choppin, J. (April, 2005). Data use in practice: Examples from the school level . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
9.
Collins, A.M., Brown, J.S., & Holum, A. ( 1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11, 38-46.
10.
Copland, M. ( 2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375-395.
11.
Council of the Great City Schools. (2002). Beating the odds II. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Los Angeles, CA: Center on Educational Governance, University of Southern California.
13.
Deming, W.E. ( 1986). Out of crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
14.
Deussen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. ( 2007). "Coach" can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in Reading First (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 005). Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Education.
15.
Edmonds, R. ( 1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-24.
16.
Feldman, J., & Tung, R. (April, 2001). Whole school reform: How schools use the data-based inquiry and decision making process. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
17.
Florida Department of Education. (2004). Just read, Florida! Middle school reading coach grant: Request for application . Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.justreadflorida.org/grants/MRC-RFP.asp
18.
Foltos, L. ( 2007). Peer coaching: Changing classroom practice and enhancing student achievement. Utah Special Educator, 27(5), 34-37.
19.
Galm, R., & Perry, G. ( 2004). Coaching moves beyond the gym. Journal of Staff Development, 25(2), 1-4.
20.
Garet, M.S., Birman, B.F., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Herman, R., & Yoon, K.S. ( 1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
21.
Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. ( 2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
22.
Guinney, E. ( 2001). Coaching isn’t just for athletes: The role of teacher leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 740-743.
23.
Gutierrez, K., Crosland, K., & Berlin, D. (April, 2001). Reconsidering coaching: Assisting teachers’ literary practices in the zone of proximal development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
24.
Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B.M., Marsh, J., McCombs, J.S., Robyn, A., Russell, J., et al. (2007). Implementing standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind: Responses of superintendents, principals, and teachers in three states. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
25.
Hasbrouk, J.E. ( 1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers . The Journal of Special Education, 31, 251-271.
26.
Hawley, W., & Valli, L. ( 1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 151-180). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
27.
Herman, J., & Gribbons, B. ( 2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
28.
Ingram, D., Louis, K.S., & Schroeder, R.G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice . Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287.
29.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. ( 1996). Staff development as a comprehensive service organization . Journal of Staff Development, 17(1), 2-6.
30.
Juran, J.M. ( 1988). Juran on planning for quality. New York: Free Press.
31.
Kerr, K.A., Marsh, J.A., Ikemoto, G.S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. ( 2006). Districtwide strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112, 496-520.
32.
Knight, J. ( 2006). Instructional coaching. School Administrator , 63(4), 36.
33.
Kohler, F.W., Crilley, K.M., Shearer, D.D., & Good, G. ( 1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes . The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 240-260.
34.
Kohler, F.W., Ezell, H.K., & Paluselli, M. ( 1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33, 154-165.
35.
Kohler, F., McCullough, K., & Buchan, K. ( 1995). Using peer coaching to enhance preschool teachers’ development and refinement of classroom activities. Early Education and Development, 6, 215-239.
36.
Lave, J. ( 1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Love, N. ( 2004). Taking data to new depths. Journal of Staff Development, 25(4), 22-26.
39.
Marsh, J.A., Pane, J.F., & Hamilton, L.S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from Recent RAND research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP170/
40.
Marsh, J.A., McCombs, J.S., Lockwood, J.R., Martorell, F., Gershwin, D., Naftel, S., et al. (2008). Supporting Literacy Across the Sunshine State: A Study of Florida Middle School Reading Coaches. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
41.
Mason, S. ( 2002). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
42.
Massell, D. ( 2001). The theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 148-169.
43.
Mayer, D. ( 1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 29-45.
44.
Morgan, R.L., Menlove, R., Salzberg, C.L., & Hudson, P. ( 1994). Effects of peer coaching on the acquisition of direct instruction skills by low-performing pre-service teachers. Journal of Special Education, 28, 59-76.
45.
Mullens, J.E., & Gayler, K. ( 1999). Measuring classroom instructional processes: Using survey and case study field test results to improve item construction. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
46.
Munro, P., & Elliot, J. ( 1987). Instructional growth through peer coaching. Journal of Staff Development, 8, 25-28.
47.
Murnane, R.J., Sharkey, N.S., & Boudett, K.P. ( 2005). Using student-assessment results to improve instruction: Lessons from a workshop. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 269-280.
48.
Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. ( 2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity . New York: The Annenberg Institute for School Reform and the Annenberg Institute Program on Education.
49.
Ragland, M., Clubine, B., Constable, D., & Smith, P.A. ( 2002). Expecting success: A study of five high performing, high poverty schools. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers and the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
50.
Richards, A. ( 2003). "Making our own road": The emergence of school-based staff developers in America’s public schools. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
51.
Rogoff, B. ( 1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Russo, A. (July/August, 2004). School-based coaching. Harvard Educational Letter. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.edletter.org/past/issues/2004-ja/coaching.shtml
53.
Senge, P. ( 1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
54.
Showers, B., & Joyce, B. ( 1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
55.
Smithson, J.L., & Porter, A.C. ( 1994). Measuring classroom practice: Lessons learned from efforts to describe the enacted curriculum-the reform up close study (CPRE Research Report Series #31). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
56.
Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. ( 2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: MDRC and the Council of Great City Schools.
57.
Supovitz, J.A., & Klein, V. ( 2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
58.
Symonds, K.W. ( 2003). After the test: How schools are using data to close the achievement gap. San Francisco: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative.
59.
Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. ( 1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Vaughan, D. ( 1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
Veenman, S., Denessen, E., Gerrits, J., & Kenter, J. ( 2001). Evaluation of a coaching program for cooperating teachers . Educational Studies, 27, 317-340.
62.
Wayman, J.C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement . American Journal of Education, 112, 549-571.
63.
Williams, T., Kirst, M., & Haertel, E. ( 2005). Similar students, different results: Why do some schools do better? A large-scale survey of California elementary schools serving low-income students. Mountain View, CA: EdSource .
64.
Wong, K., & Nicotera, A. ( 2006). Peer coaching as a strategy to build instructional capacity in low performing schools. In K. Wong & S. Rutledge (Eds.), System-wide efforts to improve student achievement. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 271-302.
