Informal communication and interaction are integral components of the practice of science, including the doctoral process. This article argues that women are disadvantaged in the informal milieu of the higher education in science, and that this milieu is not uniform everywhere. It posits that to understand the position of women in science in South Asian countries like India, the inquiry has to be conceptualized in the specific social, historical, and institutional context. Through a questionnaire survey comparing male and female perceptions, and qualitative interviews with women, an attempt has been made to understand the nature of Indian women's problems in the informal doctoral science environment. The findings indicate that though the nature of problems appears to be similar to those faced by the women in science in the West, the specific form of biases varies, and that the cultural context molds the specific forms of discrimination. This has implications for future research and policies.
Basu, A.1999. Women's education in India: Achievements and challenges. In From independence towards freedom: Indian women since 1947, edited by B. Ray and A. Basu, 135-57. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bourdieu, P.1986. The forms of capital (translated by Richard Nice). In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, edited by J. Richardson, 241-58. New York: Greenwood Press.
3.
Campbell, R.A.2003. Preparing the next generation of scientists: The social process of managing students. Social Studies of Science33 (6): 897-927.
4.
Campion, P., and W. Shrum.2004. Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Ghana, Kenya and India. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29: 459-85.
5.
Chakravarthy, R.1986. Productivity of Indian women scientists. Productivity27 (3): 259-69.
6.
Chanana, K.2000. Treading the hallowed halls: Women in higher education. Economic andPolitical Weekly35 (12): 1012-22.
——. 2001b. Hinduism and female sexuality: Social control and education of girls in India. Sociological Bulletin50 (1): 37-63.
9.
Charlesworth, M., L. Farrall, T. Stokes, and D. Turnbull.1989. Life among the scientists: An anthropological study of an Australian scientific community. Melbourne : Oxford University Press.
10.
Chitnis, S.1988. Feminism: Indian ethos and Indian convictions. In Women in Indian society: A reader, edited by R. Ghadially, 81-95. New Delhi: Sage.
11.
Conefrey, T.2000. Laboratory talk and women's retention rates in science . Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering6 (3): 251-64.
12.
Delamont, S., and P. Atkinson.2001. Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science31 (1): 87-107.
13.
Egerton, M.1997. Occupational inheritance: The role of cultural capital and gender. Work, Employment and Society11 (2): 263-82.
14.
Eisenhart, M.1994. Women scientists and the norm of gender neutrality at work. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering1 (3): 193-207.
15.
Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschtz, B. Uzzi, and J. Alonzo.1994. The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science266: 51-53.
16.
Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, and B. Uzzi.2000. Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Fox, M.F.2000. Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments. Women Studies Quarterly28: 47-61.
18.
Godbole, R., N. Gupte N., and S. Rao.2002. Women in physics, meeting reports. Current Science83: 359 —61.
19.
Gupta, N., and A.K. Sharma.2002. Women academic scientists in India. Social Studies of Science32 (5-6): 901-15.
20.
——. 2003. Gender inequality in the work environment at institutes of higher learning in science and technology in India. Work, Employment and Society17 (4): 597-616.
21.
Gupta, P., M.S. Kalra, and H.C. Verma.2004. Report On JEE-2004. Kanpur: Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur.
22.
Gurnanai, S., and M. Sheth.1984. Women scientists in India: Their position and role. Interdisciplinary Science Review9 (3): 259-70.
23.
Hanson, S.L., M. Schaub, and D.P. Baker.1996. Gender stratification in the science pipeline: A comparative analysis of seven countries. Gender and Society10 (3): 271-90.
24.
Harding, S.1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Indian National Science Academy, 2004. Science career for Indian women: An examination of Indian women's access to and retention in scientific careers. INSA, New Delhi, October 2004. http://www.insaindia.org/Scienceservice/science.htm (accessed February 3, 2007).
26.
Indiresan, P.V., and N.C. Nigam.1993. The Indian Institutes of Technology: Excellence in peril. In Higher education reform in India: Experiences and perspectives, edited by S. Chitnis and P. G. Altbach, 334-64. New Delhi: Sage.
27.
Jaiswal, R.P.1993. Professional status of women: A comparative study of women in science and technology. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
28.
Kanter, R.M.1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Knorr Cetina, K.1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Krishna, V.V.2001. Reflections on the changing status of academic science in India. International Social Science Journal53 (168): 231-46.
31.
Krishnaraj, M.1991. Women and science: Selected essays. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.
32.
Kumar, N.2001. Gender stratification in science: An empirical study in the Indian setting. Indian Journal of Gender Studies8 (1): 51-67.
33.
Merton, R.K.1996. Social structure of science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
34.
Mohanty, C.T.1991. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In Third world women and the politics of feminism , edited by C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres, 51-80. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
35.
Mukhopadhyay, C.C.1994. Family Structure and Indian Women's Participation in Science and Engineering. In Women, Education and Family Structure in India, edited by C.C. Mukhopadhyay and S. Seymour, 103-32. Colorado: Westview Press.
36.
Mukhopadhyay, C. C., and S. Seymour, eds. 1994. Women, education and family structure in India. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
37.
Okin, S.M.1999. Is multiculturalism dad for women? In Is multiculturalism bad for women? edited by J. Cohen, M. Howard, and M. C. Nussbaum, 7-24. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
Parekh, B.2000. Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. MA: Harvard University Press .
39.
Parikh, P.P., and S.P. Sukhatme.1992. Women engineers in India. Final report, Sponsored Project No. DST/RD/05/51/88, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi.
40.
Parikh, P.P., and S.P. Sukhatme.2004. Women engineers in India. Economic andPolitical Weekly39 (2): 193-201.
41.
Pattatucci, A. M., ed. 1998. Women in science: Meeting career challenges. New Delhi : Sage.
42.
Registration Data Roll List of Postgraduate Students Registered for the Second Semester 2002-2003, Academic Section, IIT Kanpur, dated January 31, 2003.
43.
Reskin, B.F.1978. Sex differentiation and the social organization of science . In Sociology of science, edited by J. Gaston, 6-37. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
44.
Rosser, S.V.2004. The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed. New York: Routledge.
45.
Sadker, M., and D. Sadker.1982. Sex equity handbook for schools. New York: Longman, Inc.
46.
——. 1994. Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls . New York: Simon and Schuster.
47.
Seymour, E., and N.M. Hewitt.1994. Talking about leaving: Factors contributing to high attrition rates among science, mathematics and engineering undergraduate majors. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Bureau of Sociological Research.
48.
Sonnert, G., and G. Holton.1996. Career patterns of women and men in sciences. American Scientist84: 63-71.
49.
Subrahmanyan, L.1998. Women scientists in the third world: The Indian experience . New Delhi: Sage.
50.
Times of India.2002. Where have all women scientists gone? Times of India, Bangalore, April 15. Times News Network,http://www.1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?art_id=6996941 (accessed February 3, 2007).
51.
Traweek, S.1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Valian, V.1999. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
53.
Wenneras, C., A. Wold.1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature387: 341-43.
54.
Xie, Y., K. Shauman.2003. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
