The present study investigates how developable behavioral (strengths use) and cognitive (meaning-making) mechanisms moderate the relationship between personal growth opportunities and entrepreneurial performance. We relied on a cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from 208 Romanian entrepreneurs and analyzed via hierarchical multiple linear regressions. The employed moderators boost the investigated relationship, both separately and interactively. The three-way interaction shows that entrepreneurs have to employ strengths use and meaning-making concomitantly to be able to capitalize on growth opportunities effectively. Consequently, this will enable entrepreneurs to rate their business performance more positively because they will perceive they have the necessary resources to invest in the business. Conversely, at low levels of strengths use and meaning-making, the presence of growth opportunities erodes entrepreneurial performance. This study identifies strengths use and meaning-making as vital psychological tools that allow an increase in entrepreneurial performance thus altering business-related investment and continuance decisions.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
3.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2014). Job demands-resources theory. In ChenP. Y.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide: Work and wellbeing (pp. 37–64). Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. http://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
5.
BakkerA. B.van WoerkomM. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology, 59(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000120
6.
BaronR. A. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.12
7.
BeutellN. J.AlsteteJ. W.SchneerJ. A.HuttC. (2019). A look at the dynamics of personal growth and self-employment exit. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(7), 1452–1470. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0239
8.
BosmaN.KelleyD. (2019). Global entrepreneurship monitor—2018/2019 global report. Gráfica Andes.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
12.
DeMartinoR.SriramachandramurthyR.MillerJ. C.AngelisJ. N. (2015). Looking inside the black box of growth efforts in declining small firms: The role of growth factors, planning, and implementation. In CorbettA. C.KatzJ. A.MckelvieA. (Eds.), Entrepreneurial growth: Individual, firm, and region advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 17, pp. 265–296). Emerald Group Publishing.
13.
DemeroutiEBakkerA. BXanthopoulouD. (2019). Job demands-resources theory and the role of individual cognitive and behavioral strategies. In TarisT.PeetersM.De WitteH. (Eds.), The fun and frustration of modern working life: Contributions from an occupational health psychology perspective (pp. 94–104). Pelckmans Pro.
14.
DijkhuizenJ.GorgievskiM.van VeldhovenM.SchalkR. (2016). Feeling successful as an entrepreneur: A job demands—resources approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0354-z
15.
DikB. J.O’ConnorW. F.ShimizuA. B.DuffyR. D. (2019). Personal growth and well-being at work: Contributions of vocational psychology. Journal of Career Development, 46(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894845317730642
16.
DillenY.LaverenE.MartensR.De VochtS.Van ImschootE. (2019). From “manager” to “strategist”: An examination of the evolving role of persistent high-growth entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2017-0010
17.
FarndaleE.MurrerI. (2015). Job resources and employee engagement: A cross-national study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(5), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2013-0318
18.
GorgievskiM. J.Antonio MorianoJ.BakkerA. B. (2014). Relating work engagement and workaholism to entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), 106–121. http://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2012-0169
19.
GorgievskiM. J.AscalonM. E.StephanU. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00322.x
20.
GreenbergD. H.MichalopoulosC.RobinsP. K. (2003). A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390305700102
21.
HobfollS. E. (2011). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In FolkmanS. (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 127–147). Oxford University Press.
22.
HuQ.SchaufeliW. B.TarisT. W. (2011). The job demands–resources model: An analysis of additive and joint effects of demands and resources. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.009
KaffkaG. A. (2017). The co-construction of entrepreneurial sensemaking: An empirical examination of socially situated cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurial cognitive development[Doctoral dissertation]. University of Twente Repository. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036543200
25.
LjungkvistT.BoersB.SamuelssonJ. (2019). Three stages of entrepreneurial orientation: The founder’s role. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2018-0630
26.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.GraysonD. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Multivariate applications book series: Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
27.
MatricanoD. (2017). Can policymakers improve the effectiveness of entrepreneurship training programmes? Evidence from Italy. Industry and Higher Education, 31(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0950422216684071
28.
MooradianT.MatzlerK.UzelacB.BauerF. (2016). Perspiration and inspiration: Grit and innovativeness as antecedents of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.08.001
29.
MurphyG. B.CallawayS. K. (2004). Doing well and happy about it? Explaining variance in entrepreneurs’ stated satisfaction with performance. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-07-02-2004-B003
30.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press and American Psychological Association.
31.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
32.
ŞahinF.KaradağH.TuncerB. (2019). Big five personality traits, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(6), 1188–1211. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2018-0466
33.
SeoR. (2020). Entrepreneurial collaboration for R&D alliance performance: A role of social capital configuration. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1357–1378. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-0023
34.
StephanU.RichterP. G. (2006). Erfolgreiche Unternehmen in Deutschland, Polen, Tschechien & Bulgarien, Bd.2: Personen, Strategien, Gesundheit und Erfolg in KMU[Successful entrepreneurs in Germany, Poland, Czech Republic & Bulgaria, 2, personality, strategies, health and success in SMEs]. TUD Press.
35.
TisuL.RusuA.SuleaC.VîrgăD. (2021). Job resources and strengths use in relation to employee performance: A contextualized view. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294121997783
36.
TsaiM. T.HuangY. C. (2008). Exploratory learning and new product performance: The moderating role of cognitive skills and environmental uncertainty. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19(2), 83–93. http://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.hitech.2008.10.001
37.
ValerioA.PartonB.RobbA. (2014). Entrepreneurship education and training programs around the world: Dimensions for success. The World Bank.
38.
Van den HeuvelM.DemeroutiE.SchreursB. H. J.BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B. (2009). Does meaning-making help during organizational change? Development and validation of a new scale. The Career Development International, 14(6), 508–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910997277
39.
Van VeldhovenM.Van den BroeckA.DanielsK.BakkerA. B.TavaresS. M.OgbonnayaC. (2020). Challenging the universality of job resources: Why, when, and for whom are they beneficial?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 69(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12211
40.
van WoerkomM.MostertK.ElsC.BakkerA. B.de BeerL.RothmannS.Jr. (2016). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1193010
41.
VîrgăD.IliescuD. (2017). The well-being of Romanian workers in Spain: Antecedents and moderators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 49–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1225728
42.
WachD.StephanU.GorgievskiM. (2016). More than money: Developing an integrative multi-factorial measure of entrepreneurial success. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1098–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615608469
43.
WaltonG. M.WilsonT. D. (2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
