This study examined the psychometric properties of Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS) in a sample of 442 adolescents by the exploratory structural equation modeling. Correlations between strength use/strength knowledge and flourish, positive affect, negative affect, depression, anxiety, stress, and GPA were examined to illustrate criterion-related validities. Results showed good internal consistency reliability, expected structure factor, and convergent validity of the SKS and the SUS in the current sample.
DienerE.SuhE. M.SmithH.ShaoL. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur?Social Indicators Research, 34, 7-32. doi:10.1007/BF01078966
2.
DuanW.XieD. (2016). Measuring adolescent flourishing: Psychometric properties of Flourishing Scale in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0734282916655504
3.
GovindjiR.LinleyP. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 143-153.
JovanovićV.Gavrilov-JerkovićV. (2016). The structure of adolescent affective well-being: The case of the PANAS among Serbian adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2097-2117. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9687-8
6.
LounsburyJ. W.FisherL. A.LevyJ. J.WelshD. P. (2009). An investigation of character strengths in relation to the academic success of college students. Individual Differences Research, 7, 52-69.
7.
MarshH. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810
8.
MarshH. W.LiemG. A. D.MartinA. J.MorinA. J. S.NagengastB. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 322-346. doi:10.1177/0734282911406657
9.
MarshH. W.VallerandR. J.LafrenièreM. A.ParkerP.MorinA. J.CarbonneauN.… GuayF. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25, 796-809. doi:10.1037/a0032573
10.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673-690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
11.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
QuinlanD.SwainN.Vella-BrodrickD. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1145-1163. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5
13.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC.BondR. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353-387. doi:10.1037/a0026838
14.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
15.
SchimmackU. (2009). Culture, gender, and the bipolarity of momentary affect: A critical re-examination. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 599-604. doi:10.1080/02699930902784313
16.
SeligmanM. E. P.ErnstR. M.GillhamJ.ReivichK.LinkinsM. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 293-311. doi:10.1080/03054980902934563
17.
WangK.ShiH.-S.GengF.-L.ZouL.-Q.TanS.-P.WangY.… ChanR. C. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China. Psychological Assessment, 28, e88-e100. doi:10.1037/pas0000207
18.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
19.
WoodA. M.LinleyP. A.MaltbyJ.KashdanT. B.HurlingR. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15-19. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004
20.
YeS. (2009). Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): The role of wording effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 197-201. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.027
21.
ZhangW.DiaoJ.ConstanceJ. S. (2004). The cross-cultural measurement of positive and negative affect examining the dimensionality of PANAS. Psychological Science, 27, 77-79.
