Given the great significance of employees’ strengths to employees’ optimal functioning, strengths-based human resource (HR) system has gradually reaped HR researchers’ attention. However, to date, there remains a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of strengths-based HR system. Therefore, this article aimed to bridge the gap in the literature by empirically testing the cross-level relationships between strengths-based HR system, employee strengths use, and supervisor-rated employee performance (i.e., task performance and innovative behavior). Data from 205 employees working in 56 organizations in China were collected at three points in time from different sources. The results of multilevel path analysis showed that strengths-based HR system has a positive relationship with employee strengths use, and employee strengths use is positively related to supervisor-rated employee task performance and innovative behavior. More importantly, strengths-based HR system had a positive relationship with employee task performance and innovative behavior via employee strengths use.
AllanB. A.OwensR. L.KimT.DouglassR. P.HintzJ. (2021). Strengths and satisfaction in first year undergraduate students: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(1), 94–104.
2.
ArthurJ. B.BoylesT. (2007). Validating the human resource system structure: A levels-based strategic HRM approach. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 77–92.
3.
AveyJ. B.LuthansF.HannahS. T.SweetmanD.PetersonC. (2012). Impact of employees’ character strengths of wisdom on stress and creative performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(2), 165–181.
4.
BachrachD. G.WangH.BendolyE.ZhangS. (2007). Importance of organizational citizenship behaviour for overall performance evaluation: Comparing the role of task interdependence in China and the USA. Management and Organization Review, 3(2), 255–276.
5.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
6.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.LiekeL. (2012). Work engagement, performance, and active learning: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 555–564.
7.
BakkerA. B.Van WingerdenJ. (2021). Do personal resources and strengths use increase work engagement? The effects of a training intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(1), 20–30.
8.
BakkerA. B.Van WoerkomM. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology, 59(1), 38–46.
9.
BeckerT. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.
10.
BibbS. (2016). Strengths-based recruitment and development: A practical guide to transforming talent management strategy for business results. Kogan Page.
11.
Biswas-DienerR.KashdanT. B.LyubchikN. (2016). Psychological strengths at work. In OadesL. G.StegerM. F.Delle FaveA.PassmoreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of positivity and strengths-based approaches at work (pp. 34–47). Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
Biswas-DienerR.KashdanT. B.MinhasG. (2011). A dynamic approach to psychological strength development and intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(2), 106–118.
13.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
14.
BoonC.Den HartogD. N.LepakD. P. (2019). A systematic review of human resource management systems and their measurement. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2498–2537.
15.
Bouskila-YamO.KlugerA. N. (2011). Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 137–147.
16.
BoxallP.MackyK. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3–23.
17.
BrislinR. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
18.
ChanS. H. J.LaiH. Y. I. (2017). Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 70, 214–223.
19.
ChenT.LiF.LeungK. (2016). When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self-efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 123–158.
20.
ChenY.JiangY. J.TangG.CookeF. L. (2018). High-commitment work systems and middle managers’ innovative behavior in the Chinese context: The moderating role of work-life conflicts and work climate. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1317–1334.
21.
ConnellyB. L.CertoS. T.IrelandR. D.ReutzelC. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.
22.
CooperB.WangJ.BartramT.CookeF. L. (2019). Well-being-oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: The role of social climate and resilience. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 85–97.
23.
CuiY.YuG. (2021). A cross-level examination of team-directed empowering leadership and subordinates’ innovative performance: an AMO theory perspective. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2020-0099
24.
DebusscherJ.HofmansJ.De FruytF. (2017). The multiple face (t) s of state conscientiousness: Predicting task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 78–85.
25.
DeleryJ. E.RoumpiD. (2017). Strategic human resource management, human capital and competitive advantage: Is the field going in circles?Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 1–21.
26.
DingH.LinX. (2020). Exploring the relationship between core self-evaluation and strengths use: The perspective of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 1–5.
27.
DingH.LinX.SuW. (2021). Employee strengths use and innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Chinese Management Studies, 15(2), 350–362.
28.
DingH.YuE.XuS. (2021). Development and validation of perceived strengths-based human resource system scale. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2020-0466
29.
DubreuilP.ForestJ.CourcyF. (2014). From strengths use to work performance: The role of harmonious passion, subjective vitality, and concentration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 335–349.
30.
GhielenS. T. S.van WoerkomM.Christina MeyersM. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 573–585.
31.
GuillénL.KunzeF. (2019). When age does not harm innovative behavior and perceptions of competence: Testing interdepartmental collaboration as a social buffer. Human Resource Management, 58(3), 301–316.
32.
HanJ. H.KangS.OhI. S.KehoeR. R.LepakD. P. (2019). The goldilocks effect of strategic human resource management? Optimizing the benefits of a high-performance work system through the dual alignment of vertical and horizontal fit. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1388–1412.
33.
HarveyG.TurnbullP. (2020). Ricardo flies Ryanair: Strategic human resource management and competitive advantage in a single European aviation market. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(4), 553–565.
34.
HunterS. T.CushenberyL. D.JayneB. (2017). Why dual leaders will drive innovation: Resolving the exploration and exploitation dilemma with a conservation of resources solution. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1183–1195.
35.
JanssenO. (2011). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
36.
JiangK.LepakD. P.HanK.HongY.KimA.WinklerA. L. (2012). Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 73–85.
37.
KongD. T.HoV. T. (2016). A self-determination perspective of strengths use at work: Examining its determinant and performance implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(1), 15–25.
38.
KwokS. Y.FangS. (2021). A cross-lagged panel study examining the reciprocal relationships between positive emotions, meaning, strengths use and study engagement in primary school students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(3), 1033–1053.
39.
LiY.WangM.Van JaarsveldD. D.LeeG. K.MaD. G. (2018). From employee-experienced high-involvement work system to innovation: An emergence-based human resource management framework. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 2000–2019.
40.
LinY. T.LiuN. C. (2019). Corporate citizenship and employee outcomes: Does a high-commitment work system matter?Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 1079–1097.
41.
LinleyP. A.WoolstonL.Biswas-DienerR. (2009). Strengths coaching with leaders. International Coaching Psychology Review, 4(1), 37–48.
42.
Littman-OvadiaH.LavyS.Boiman-MeshitaM. (2017). When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 527–548.
43.
LuthansF. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 57–72.
44.
MeyersM. C.AdamsB. G.SekajaL.BuzeaC.CazanA. M.GoteaM.StefenelD.van WoerkomM. (2019). Perceived organizational support for the use of employees’ strengths and employee well-being: a cross-country comparison. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1825–1841.
45.
MphahleleP.ElsC.De BeerL. T.MostertK. (2018). Investigating strengths and deficits to increase work engagement: A longitudinal study in the mining industry. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 1–16.
46.
PakK.KooijD. T.De LangeA. H.Van VeldhovenM. J. (2019). Human Resource Management and the ability, motivation and opportunity to continue working: A review of quantitative studies. Human Resource Management Review, 29(3), 336–352.
47.
PanaccioA.HendersonD. J.LidenR. C.WayneS. J.CaoX. (2015). Toward an understanding of when and why servant leadership accounts for employee extra-role behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 657–675.
48.
PangD.RuchW. (2019). Fusing character strengths and mindfulness interventions: Benefits for job satisfaction and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(1), 150–162.
49.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
50.
RathT.ConchieB. (2008). Strengths based leadership: Great leaders, teams and why people follow. Gallup Press.
51.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
52.
Van WoerkomM.BakkerA. B.NishiiL. H. (2016). Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 141–150.
53.
Van WoerkomM.MeyersM. C. (2015). My strengths count! effects of a strengths-based psychological climate on positive affect and job performance. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 81–103.
54.
Van WoerkomM.MostertK.ElsC.BakkerA. B.De BeerL.RothmannS.Jr. (2016). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960–975.
55.
Van WoerkomM.OerlemansW.BakkerA. B. (2016). Strengths use and work engagement: A weekly diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 384–397.
56.
WilliamsL. J.CoteJ. A.BuckleyM. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462–468.
57.
WoodA. M.LinleyP. A.MaltbyJ.KashdanT. B.HurlingR. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19.
58.
YuanF.WoodmanR. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.
