CEO Machiavellianism and Strategic Alliances in Family Firms

Abstract

In this study, we build on upper echelons theory and insights from psychology to suggest that CEO Machiavellianism is manifested in the alliance behaviors of family firms. Specifically, we argue that more Machiavellian chief executive officers (CEOs) seek out strategic alliances—as doing so provides opportunities to manipulate, control, and exploit others—and that their tendency toward manipulative and controlling behaviors results in less sustainable alliances. We also argue that the effect of CEO Machiavellianism on the engagement and sustainability of strategic alliances is affected by operating in family firms. Since the owning family often intervenes and mitigates any concerns regarding the organization or its leadership, we argue that any concerns that alliance partners have regarding more Machiavellian CEOs will be weaker as family ownership increases; as such, we argue that as family ownership increases, the positive relationship between CEO Machiavellianism and strategic alliance engagement will be more strongly positive while the negative relationship between CEO Machiavellianism and alliance sustainability will be less strongly negative. Our study presents and tests a theory of how more Machiavellian CEOs affect the decisions surrounding strategic alliances by providing a novel antecedent of the decisions surrounding strategic alliances in family firms. We find support for our arguments with a sample of Standard & Poor’s 500 firms.

Keywords

upper echelons theory CEO Machiavellianism strategic alliances managerial discretion family firms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

Calabro

Huybrechts

Woywode

(2019). The enigma of the family successor–firm performance relationship: A methodological reflection and reconciliation attempt. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(3), 437-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718816290

Anderson

R. C.

Reeb

D. M.

(2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567

Anderson

R. C.

Reeb

D. M.

(2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 Firms., Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131472

Andres

(2011). Family ownership, financing constraints and investment decisions. Applied Financial Economics, 21(22), 1641–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.589805

Arend

R. J.

Seale

D. A.

(2005). Modeling alliance activity: An iterated prisoners’ dilemma with exit option. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1057-1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.491

Austin

E. J.

Farrelly

Black

Moore

(2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.019

Bae

Insead

M. G.

(2004). Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 843-859. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159626

Ballinger

G. A.

Marcel

J. J.

(2010). The use of an interim CEO during succession episodes and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 262-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.808

Barach

J. A.

Ganitsky

J. B.

(1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8(2), 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00131.x

10.

Boling

Pieper

Covin

(2016). CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 891-913. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12150

11.

Bollaert

Petit

(2010). Beyond the dark side of executive psychology: Current research and new directions. European Management Journal, 28(5), 362-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.01.001

12.

Braun

Sharma

(2007). Should the CEO also be chair of the board? An empirical examination of family-controlled public firms. Family Business Review, 20(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00090.x

13.

Brinke

L. T.

Black

P. J.

Porter

Carney

D. R.

(2015). Psychopathic personality traits predict competitive wins and cooperative losses in negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.001

14.

Brouthers

K. D.

Brouthers

L. E.

Wilkinson

T. J.

(1995). Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning, 28(3), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(95)00008-7

15.

Bruyaka

Philippe

Castaner

(2018). Run away or stick together? The impact of organization-specific adverse events on alliance partner defection. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 445-469. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0323

16.

Burgstaller

Wagner

(2015). How do family ownership and founder management affect capital structure decisions and adjustment of SMEs? Journal of Risk Finance, 16(1), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0091

17.

Campbell

R. J.

Jeong

Graffin

S. D.

(2019). Born to take risk? The effect of CEO birth order on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1278-1306. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0790

18.

Certo

S. T.

Busenbark

J. R.

Woo

H. S.

Semadeni

(2016). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2639-2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475

19.

Certo

S. T.

Covin

J. G.

Daily

C. M.

Dalton

D. R.

(2001). Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.182

20.

Chandler

J. A.

Payne

G. T.

Moore

Brigham

K. H.

(2019). Family involvement signals in initial public offerings. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.004

21.

Chandler

J. A.

Zachary

M. A.

Brigham

K. H.

Payne

G. T.

(2016). Long-term orientation: Reviewing the past and identifying future opportunities for family business research. In Kellermanns

F. W.

Hoy

(Eds.), The Routledge companion to family business (pp. 100-119). Routledge.

22.

Chatterjee

Hambrick

D. C.

(2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351-386. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351

23.

Chatterjee

Hambrick

D. C.

(2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk-taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211427534

24.

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

Sharma

(2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x

25.

Chrisman

J. J.

Patel

P. C.

(2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976-997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211

26.

Christie

Geis

F. L.

(1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50006-3

27.

Churchwell

(2016, January 25). Fast answers. Harvard Business School. https://asklib.library.hbs.edu/faq/47760

28.

Connelly

B. S.

Ones

D. S.

(2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 36(6), 1092-1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212

29.

Cooper

Peterson

(1980). Machiavellianism and spontaneous cheating in competition. Journal of Research in Personality, 14(1), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(80)90041-0

30.

Cycyota

C. S.

Harrison

D. A.

(2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280770

31.

Cyert

R. M.

March

J. G

. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.

32.

Dahling

J. J.

Whitaker

B. G.

Levy

P. E.

(2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618

33.

Das

T. K.

Rahman

(2001). Partner misbehaviour in strategic alliances: Guidelines for effective deterrence. Journal of General Management, 27(1), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700102700103

34.

Das

T. K.

Teng

B. S.

(1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926623

35.

Deephouse

D. L.

Jaskiewicz

(2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12015

36.

Den Hartog

D. N.

Belschak

F. D

. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1296-4

37.

Dewaele

Furnham

(1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49(3), 509-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00098

38.

Dumas

C. A.

(1990). Preparing the new CEO: Managing the father–daughter succession process in family businesses. Family Business Review, 3(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1990.00169.x

39.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

Schoonhoven

C. B.

(1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.136

40.

Fehr

Samson

Paulhus

D. R.

(1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In Spielberger

C. D.

Butcher

J. N.

(Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 77-116). Lawrence Erlbaum.

41.

Finkelstein

(1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505-538. https://doi.org/10.5465/256485

42.

Fischer

H. M.

Pollock

T. G.

(2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 463-481. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159597

43.

Fowler

K. A.

Lilenfeld

S. O.

Patrick

C. J.

(2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessments, 21(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014938

44.

Furnham

Richards

S. C.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018

45.

Geis

F. L.

Moon

T. H.

(1981). Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 766-775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.766

46.

Gomez-Mejia

L. R.

Neacsu

Martin

(2019). CEO risk-taking and socioemotional wealth: The behavioral agency model, family control, and CEO option wealth. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1713-1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317723711

47.

Goodstein

Gautam

Boeker

(1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150305

48.

Greenbaum

R. L.

Hill

Mawritz

M. B.

Quade

M. J.

(2017). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior. Journal of Management, 43(2), 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314535434

49.

Gunnthorsdottir

McCabe

Smith

(2002). Using the Machiavellianism to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00067-8

50.

Gupta

Misangyi

V. F.

(2018). Follow the leader (or not): The influence of peer CEOs’ characteristics on interorganizational imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1437-1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2765

51.

Gupta

Nadkarni

Mariam

(2019). Dispositional sources of managerial discretion: CEO ideology, CEO personality, and firm strategies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 855-893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218793128

52.

Haleblian

Devers

C. E.

McNamara

Carpenter

M. A.

Davison

R. B.

(2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330554

53.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254

54.

Hambrick

D. C.

Mason

P. A.

(1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

55.

Hardin

J. W.

Hilbe

J. M.

(2012). Generalized estimating equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13880

56.

Harrell

W. A.

Hartnagel

(1976). The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft. Sociometry, 39(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786216

57.

Harrison

J. S.

Hitt

M. A.

Hoskisson

R. E.

Ireland

R. D.

(2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700605

58.

Hayward

Hambrick

D. C.

(1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393810

59.

Heckman

J. J.

(1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475-492.

60.

Hill

A. D.

Kern

D. A.

White

M. A.

(2012). Building understanding in strategy research: The importance of employing consistent terminology and convergent measures. Strategic Organization, 10(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012445239

61.

Hill

A. D.

Kern

D. A.

White

M. A.

(2014). Are we overconfident in executive overconfidence research? An examination of the convergent and content validity of extant unobtrusive measures. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1414-1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.011

62.

Hill

Petrenko

Ridge

Aime

(2019). Videometric measurement of individual characteristics in difficult to access subject pools: Demonstrating with CEOs. In Ketchen

Bergh

(Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 11, pp. 39-61). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720190000011005

63.

Hill

White

Wallace

(2014). Unobtrusive measurement of psychological constructs in organizational research. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(2), 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386613505613

64.

Hubbard

T. D.

Pollock

T. G.

Pfarrer

M. D.

Rindova

V. P.

(2018). Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1976-1999. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0438

65.

Jones

D. N.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2009). Machiavellianism. In Leary

M. R.

Hoyle

R. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93-108). Guilford Press.

66.

Judge

T. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Kosalka

(2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004

67.

Kasznik

Lev

(1995). To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. Accounting Review, 70(1), 113-134.

68.

Kelleci

Lambrechts

Voordeckers

(2019). CEO personality: A different perspective on the nonfamily versus family CEO debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518811222

69.

Kessler

S. R.

Bandelli

A. C.

Spector

P. E.

Borman

W. C.

Nelson

C. E.

Penney

L. M.

(2010). Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8), 1868-1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00643.x

70.

Kinni

(2013, November 20). A call for true Machiavellian leadership. strategy+business. https://www.strategy-business.com/blog/A-Call-for-True-Machiavellian-Leadership?gko=07567

71.

Kish-Gephart

J. J.

Harrison

D. A.

Treviño

L. K.

(2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103

72.

Krishnan

Geyskens

Steenkamp

J. E. M.

(2016). The effectiveness of contractual and trust-based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2521-2542. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2469

73.

Le Breton-Miller

Miller

. (2008). To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy, and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Strategy and Management, 1(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554250810909419

74.

Tang

(2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036912

75.

Liang

K. Y.

Zeger

S. L.

(1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.13

76.

Linton

D. K.

Wiener

N. I.

(2001). Personality and potential conceptions: Mating success in a modern Western male sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(5), 675-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00170-7

77.

Machiavelli

(1966). The prince. Bantam. (Original work published 1513)

78.

Malhotra

Reus

T. H.

Zhu

Roelofsen

E. M.

(2018). The acquisitive nature of extraverted CEOs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 370-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217712240

79.

Malmendier

Tate

(2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x

80.

March

J. C.

Simon

H. A.

(1958). Organizations. Wiley.

81.

Maritain

(1942). The end of Machiavellianism. Review of Politics, 4(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500003235

82.

Matsumoto

Pronk

Roelofsen

(2011). What makes conference calls useful? The information content of managers’ presentations and analysts’ discussion sessions. Accounting Review, 86(4), 1383-1414. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10034

83.

McHoskey

(1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23(4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021338809469

84.

Miller

Le Breton-Miller

Lester

R. H.

(2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00896.x

85.

Miller

J. S.

Wiseman

R. M.

Gomez-Mejia

L. R.

(2002). The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 745-756. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069308

86.

Nadkarni

Chen

(2016). The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1132-1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2376

87.

Nelson

(2003). The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 707-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.328

88.

Nicholson

(2008). Evolutionary psychology and family business: A new synthesis for theory, research, and practice. Family Business Review, 21(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00111.x

89.

Nsehe

(2011, July 13). 5 Machiavellian business lessons from billionaire Aliko Dangote. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mfonobongnsehe/2011/07/13/5-machiavellian-business-lessons-from-billionaire-aliko-dangote/#6b0047b36930

90.

Nielsen

B. B.

(2010). Multilevel issues in strategic alliance research. Researching strategic alliances: Emerging issues, 1–26.

91.

O’Boyle

E. H.

Forsyth

D. R.

Banks

G. C.

McDaniel

M. A.

(2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679

92.

Oltmanns

T. F.

Friedman

J. N.

Fiedler

E. R.

Turkheimer

(2004). Perceptions of people with personality disorders based on thin slices of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00066-7

93.

A. Y.

Tsui

A. S.

Kinicki

A. J.

Waldman

D. A.

Xiao

Song

L. J.

(2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213520131

94.

Owen-Smith

Powell

W. W.

(2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0054

95.

Paal

Bereczkei

(2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.021

96.

Paulhus

D. L.

Williams

K. M.

(2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

97.

Petrenko

O. V.

Aime

Recendes

Chandler

J. A.

(2019). The case for humble expectations: CEO humility and market performance. Strategic Management Journal, 40(12), 1938-1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3071

98.

Petrenko

O. V.

Aime

Ridge

Hill

(2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2348

99.

Picone

P. M.

Dagnino

G. B.

Mina

(2014). The origin of failure: A multidisciplinary appraisal of the hubris hypothesis and proposed research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0177

100.

Podolny

J. M.

(2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1086/323038

101.

Quigley

T. J.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2012). When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 834-859. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1945

102.

Raskin

Novacek

Hogan

(1991). Narcissistic self-esteem management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 911-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.911

103.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Kolar

G. P.

(2012). How “dark” are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 884-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020

104.

Rosenstein

Bruno

A. V.

Bygrave

W. D.

Taylor

N. T.

(1993). The CEO, venture capitalists, and the board. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90014-V

105.

Schilling

M. A.

(2008). Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.731

106.

Semadeni

Withers

M. C.

Certo

S. T.

(2014). The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1070-1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2136

107.

Sharma

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

Steier

L. P.

(2020). Family firm behavior from a psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719879675

108.

Short

J. C.

Zachary

M. A.

Ketchen

D. J.

Jr. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation rhetoric and franchise system size: The moderating role of military veteran recruitment. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10, Art. No. e00097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00097

109.

Siegel

Castellan

(1988). Nonparametrics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

110.

Slepian

M. L.

Bogart

K. R.

Ambady

(2014). Thin-slice judgments in the clinical context. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090413-123522

111.

Smith

M. B.

Hill

A. D.

Wallace

J. C.

Recendes

Judge

T. A.

(2018). Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality: A multidomain review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 44(1), 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317733511

112.

Stern

Dukerich

J. M.

Zajac

(2014). Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 512-531. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2116

113.

Stinchcombe

A. L.

(1965). Social structure and organizations. In March

J. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Rand McNally.

114.

Stuart

T. E.

(1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668-698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393679

115.

Tang

Yang

(2012). What I see, what I do. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1698-1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441211

116.

Tobak

(2011, February 15). 10 Business and leadership lessons: From Machiavelli. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/10-business-and-leadership-lessons-from-machiavelli/

117.

Tsai

Hung

Kuo

(2006). CEO tenure in Taiwanese family and nonfamily firms: An agency theory perspective. Family Business Review, 19(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00057.x

118.

Vella

(1998). Estimating models with sample selection bias: A survey. Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 127-169. https://doi.org/10.2307/146317

119.

Ward

J. L.

(2016). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuous growth, profitability, and family leadership. Jossey-Bass.

120.

Westphal

J. D.

Bednar

M. K.

(2005). Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms’ strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 262-298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.262

121.

Whiten

Byrne

R. B.

(1988). Taking (Machiavellian) intelligence apart. In Byrne

Whiten

(Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence (pp. 50-66). Oxford University Press.

122.

Wiggins

J. S.

Broughton

(1985). The interpersonal circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research. Perspectives in Personality, 1, 1-47.

123.

Williamson

Ouchi

(1981). The markets and hierarchies and visible hand perspectives. In Van de Ven

A. H.

Joyce

W. F.

(Eds.), Perspectives on organizational design and behavior (pp. 347-370). Wiley.

124.

Wilson

D. S.

Near

Miller

R. R.

(1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285

125.

Zellweger

T. M.

Nason

R. S.

Nordqvist

Brush

C. G.

(2013). Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x

126.

Zhou

(2001). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance: Comment. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 559-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00085-X

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.48 MB