Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-3
Psychological Antecedents of Decision Comprehensiveness and Their Relationship to Decision Quality and Performance in Family Firms: An Upper Echelons Perspective
We present a model of family firm performance that tests the notion that strategic decision comprehensiveness plays a pivotal role in family business decision quality and performance. With insights derived from upper echelons theory, our model further proposes that two key decision maker traits associated with an individual’s information-gathering process—risk-taking propensity and need for cognition—influence strategic decision comprehensiveness and have indirect effects on both study outcomes. Study results using a time-lagged sample of family firm leaders provide broad support for our proposed model and provide insight into the performance and decision-making heterogeneity present in family firms.
AlexievA. S.JansenJ. J. P.Van den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343-1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x
2.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237.
3.
Atuahene-GimaK.LiH. (2004). Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159603
BromileyP.RauD. (2016). Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240
CacioppoJ. T.PettyP. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
8.
CarnevaleJ. J.InbarY.LernerJ. S. (2011). Individual differences in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 274-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.002
9.
CarneyM.Van EssenM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. M. A. R. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12054
10.
CarpenterM. A.GeletkanyczM. A.SandersW. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
11.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x
12.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00540.x
14.
CohenA. R.StotlandE.WolfeD. M. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(2), 291-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042761
DeanJ.SharfmanM. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/256784
17.
De MassisA.FrattiniFMajocchiA.PiscitelloL. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1199
18.
ExlineJ. J.KraftA. J.BaumeisterR. F.ZellA. L.WitvlietC. V. (2008). Not so innocent: Does seeing one’s own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495
19.
FeistJ.FeistG. J.RobertsT. (2017). Theories of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
20.
ForbesD. P. (2007). Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24349585
21.
FredricksonJ. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.5465/256039
22.
GlickW.MillerC.HuberG. (1993). The impact of upper echelon diversity on organizational performance. In HuberG.GlickW. (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance (pp. 176-214). Oxford University Press.
23.
GoffM.AckermanP. L. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.537
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
26.
HaynieJ. M.ShepherdD. A.PatzeltH. (2012). Cognitive adaptability and an entrepreneurial task: The role of metacognitive ability and feedback. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00410.x
27.
HeaveyC.SimsekZ.RocheF.KellyA. (2009). Decision comprehensiveness and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of managerial uncertainty preferences and environmental dynamism. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1289-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00858.x
JanisI.MannL. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. The Free Press.
30.
KelleciR.LambrechtsF.VoordeckersW.HuybrechtsJ. (2019). CEO personality: A different perspective on the nonfamily versus family CEO debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31-57.
31.
KoroppC.GrichnikD.KellermannsF. W.StanleyL. (2014). Financial decision making in family firms: An adaptation of the theory of planned behavior. Family Business Review, 27(4), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514522483
32.
KraiczyN. D.HackA.KellermannsF. W. (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12203
33.
LauriolaM.LevinI. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(2), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00130-6
34.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2008). To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Strategy and Management, 1(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554250810909419
35.
LiJ.TangY. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036912
36.
LionR.MeertensR. M. (2001). Seeking information about a risky medicine: Effects of risk-taking tendency and accountability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 778-795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01413.x
McDougallP. P.CovinJ. G.RobinsonR. B.HerronL. (1994). The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategic content. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150704
39.
MeertensR. M.LionR. (2008). Measuring an individual’s tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1506-1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.547254
40.
MeertensR. M.LionR. (2011). The effects of risk-taking tendency on risk choice and pre- and post-decisional information selection. Journal of Risk Research, 14(6), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.547254
41.
MillerC. C. (2008). Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: Toward a more complete understanding. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(5), 598-629. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.607
42.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
43.
MitchellJ. R.HartT. A.ValceaS.TownsendD. M. (2009). Becoming the boss: Discretion and postsuccession success in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1201-1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00341.x
44.
OttoA. S.ClarksonJ. J.KardesF. R. (2016). Decision sidestepping: How the motivation for closure prompts individuals to bypass decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000057
PenneyC. P.VardamanJ. M.MarlerL. E.Antin-YatesV. A. (2019). An image theory of strategic decision-making in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-05-2019-0032
47.
PettyR. E.BrinolP.LoerschC.McCaslinM. J. (2009). The need for cognition. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 318-329). Guilford Press.
48.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
49.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
50.
PohlingR.BzdokD.EigenstetterM.StumpfS.StrobelA. (2016). What is ethical competence? The role of empathy, personal values, and the five-factor model of personality in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2569-5
51.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
52.
RauS. B.Schneider-SiebkeV.GüntherC.NeubaumD. O.KammerlanderN.BrighamK. H. (2019). Family firm values explaining family firm heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 32(2), 195-215.
53.
ReinaC. S.PetersonS. J.ZhangZ. (2017). Adverse effects of CEO family-to-work conflict on firm performance. Organization Science, 28(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1114
SimonsT.PelledL.SmithK. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662-673. https://doi.org/10.2307/256987
56.
VardamanJ. M.AllenD. G.RennR. W.MoffittK. R. (2008). Should I stay or should I go? The role of risk in employee turnover decisions. Human Relations, 61(11), 1531-1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708096637
57.
VardamanJ. M.GondoM. B. (2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12126
58.
WagnerD.BlockJ.MillerD.SchwensC.XiG. (2015). A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.01.001
59.
TangY.LiJ.LiuY. (2016). Does founder CEO status affect firm risk taking?Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 322-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815623736
60.
WallT. D.MichieJ.PattersonM.WoodS. J.SheehanM.CleggC. W.WestM. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x
61.
WangG.HolmesR. M.OhI.ZhuW. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140
62.
WoodsJ. A.DanesS. M.UhaltJ. (2019). The impact of customer orientation and family decision-making style on family business performance. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 27(2), 147-176. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495819500067
63.
ZahraS. A.NeubaumD.El-HagrasseyG. (2002). Competitive analysis and new venture performance: Understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-2-00001
