Psychological Antecedents of Decision Comprehensiveness and Their Relationship to Decision Quality and Performance in Family Firms: An Upper Echelons Perspective

Abstract

We present a model of family firm performance that tests the notion that strategic decision comprehensiveness plays a pivotal role in family business decision quality and performance. With insights derived from upper echelons theory, our model further proposes that two key decision maker traits associated with an individual’s information-gathering process—risk-taking propensity and need for cognition—influence strategic decision comprehensiveness and have indirect effects on both study outcomes. Study results using a time-lagged sample of family firm leaders provide broad support for our proposed model and provide insight into the performance and decision-making heterogeneity present in family firms.

Keywords

decision making family firm performance heterogeneity personality upper echelons theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexiev

A. S.

Jansen

J. J. P.

Van den Bosch

F. A. J.

Volberda

H. W.

(2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343-1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x

Anderson

R. C.

Reeb

D. M.

(2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237.

Atuahene-Gima

(2004). Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159603

Barrick

M. R.

Mount

M. K.

(1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

Bromiley

Rau

(2016). Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

P. E.

(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

P. E.

Kao

C. F.

(1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13

Carnevale

J. J.

Inbar

Lerner

J. S.

(2011). Individual differences in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 274-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.002

Carney

Van Essen

Gedajlovic

E. R.

Heugens

P. P. M. A. R

. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12054

10.

Carpenter

M. A.

Geletkanycz

M. A.

Sanders

W. G.

(2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001

11.

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

Sharma

(2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x

12.

Chua

J. H.

Chrisman

J. J.

Sharma

(1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402

13.

Chua

J. H.

Chrisman

J. J.

Steier

L. P.

Rau

S. B.

(2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00540.x

14.

Cohen

A. R.

Stotland

Wolfe

D. M.

(1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(2), 291-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042761

15.

Colli

(2003). The history of family business 1850 to 2000. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615009

16.

Dean

Sharfman

(1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/256784

17.

De Massis

Frattini

Majocchi

Piscitello

. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1199

18.

Exline

J. J.

Kraft

A. J.

Baumeister

R. F.

Zell

A. L.

Witvliet

C. V.

(2008). Not so innocent: Does seeing one’s own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495

19.

Feist

G. J.

Roberts

(2017). Theories of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Forbes

D. P.

(2007). Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24349585

21.

Fredrickson

(1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.5465/256039

22.

Glick

Miller

Huber

(1993). The impact of upper echelon diversity on organizational performance. In Huber

Glick

(Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance (pp. 176-214). Oxford University Press.

23.

Goff

Ackerman

P. L.

(1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.537

24.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254

25.

Hambrick

D. C.

Mason

P. A.

(1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

26.

Haynie

J. M.

Shepherd

D. A.

Patzelt

(2012). Cognitive adaptability and an entrepreneurial task: The role of metacognitive ability and feedback. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00410.x

27.

Heavey

Simsek

Roche

Kelly

(2009). Decision comprehensiveness and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of managerial uncertainty preferences and environmental dynamism. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1289-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00858.x

28.

Ireland

R. D.

Miller

(2004). Decision-making and firm success. Academy of Management Executive, 18(4), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.15268665

29.

Janis

Mann

(1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. The Free Press.

30.

Kelleci

Lambrechts

Voordeckers

Huybrechts

(2019). CEO personality: A different perspective on the nonfamily versus family CEO debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31-57.

31.

Koropp

Grichnik

Kellermanns

F. W.

Stanley

(2014). Financial decision making in family firms: An adaptation of the theory of planned behavior. Family Business Review, 27(4), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514522483

32.

Kraiczy

N. D.

Hack

Kellermanns

F. W.

(2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12203

33.

Lauriola

Levin

I. P.

(2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(2), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00130-6

34.

Le Breton-Miller

Miller

. (2008). To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Strategy and Management, 1(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554250810909419

35.

Tang

(2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036912

36.

Lion

Meertens

R. M.

(2001). Seeking information about a risky medicine: Effects of risk-taking tendency and accountability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 778-795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01413.x

37.

Mann

Burnett

Radford

Ford

(1997). The Melbourne decision making questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1%3C1::AID-BDM242%3E3.0.CO;2-X

38.

McDougall

P. P.

Covin

J. G.

Robinson

R. B.

Herron

(1994). The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategic content. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150704

39.

Meertens

R. M.

Lion

(2008). Measuring an individual’s tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1506-1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.547254

40.

Meertens

R. M.

Lion

(2011). The effects of risk-taking tendency on risk choice and pre- and post-decisional information selection. Journal of Risk Research, 14(6), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.547254

41.

Miller

C. C.

(2008). Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: Toward a more complete understanding. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(5), 598-629. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.607

42.

Miller

Le Breton-Miller

Lester

R. H.

(2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0728

43.

Mitchell

J. R.

Hart

T. A.

Valcea

Townsend

D. M.

(2009). Becoming the boss: Discretion and postsuccession success in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1201-1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00341.x

44.

Otto

A. S.

Clarkson

J. J.

Kardes

F. R.

(2016). Decision sidestepping: How the motivation for closure prompts individuals to bypass decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000057

45.

Papadakis

V. M.

Lioukas

Chambers

(1998). Strategic decision-making processes: The role of management and context. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 115-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199802)19:2%3C115::AID-SMJ941%3E3.0.CO;2-5

46.

Penney

C. P.

Vardaman

J. M.

Marler

L. E.

Antin-Yates

V. A.

(2019). An image theory of strategic decision-making in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-05-2019-0032

47.

Petty

R. E.

Brinol

Loersch

McCaslin

M. J.

(2009). The need for cognition. In Leary

M. R.

Hoyle

R. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 318-329). Guilford Press.

48.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

49.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

50.

Pohling

Bzdok

Eigenstetter

Stumpf

Strobel

(2016). What is ethical competence? The role of empathy, personal values, and the five-factor model of personality in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2569-5

51.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

52.

Rau

S. B.

Schneider-Siebke

Günther

Neubaum

D. O.

Kammerlander

Brigham

K. H.

(2019). Family firm values explaining family firm heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 32(2), 195-215.

53.

Reina

C. S.

Peterson

S. J.

Zhang

(2017). Adverse effects of CEO family-to-work conflict on firm performance. Organization Science, 28(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1114

54.

Sadowski

C. J.

(1993). An examination of the short need for cognition scale. Journal of Psychology, 127(4), 451-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9915581

55.

Simons

Pelled

Smith

(1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662-673. https://doi.org/10.2307/256987

56.

Vardaman

J. M.

Allen

D. G.

Renn

R. W.

Moffitt

K. R.

(2008). Should I stay or should I go? The role of risk in employee turnover decisions. Human Relations, 61(11), 1531-1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708096637

57.

Vardaman

J. M.

Gondo

M. B.

(2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12126

58.

Wagner

Block

Miller

Schwens

(2015). A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.01.001

59.

Tang

Liu

(2016). Does founder CEO status affect firm risk taking? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 322-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815623736

60.

Wall

T. D.

Michie

Patterson

Wood

S. J.

Sheehan

Clegg

C. W.

West

(2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x

61.

Wang

Holmes

R. M.

Zhu

(2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140

62.

Woods

J. A.

Danes

S. M.

Uhalt

(2019). The impact of customer orientation and family decision-making style on family business performance. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 27(2), 147-176. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495819500067

63.

Zahra

S. A.

Neubaum

El-Hagrassey

(2002). Competitive analysis and new venture performance: Understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-2-00001

64.

Zahra

S. A.

Wright

(2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0149

65.

Zuckerman

(1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Lawrence Erlbaum.

66.

Zuckerman

(1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press.