We use a social exchange perspective to review family firm succession literature owing to its fit with the multiphase, multistakeholder nature of the process. We searched the history of 34 journals, finding 88 published or forthcoming articles that quantitatively examined succession. We consider the primary phases of the management succession process (ground rules, successor development, and transition) and the relevant stakeholder exchanges occurring during each phase, including exchanges between incumbents and successors, within family boundaries, and across family boundaries. We contribute to the family firm succession literature by identifying how a social exchange perspective can help guide future research.
AllenM. P.PanianS. K. (1982). Power, performance, and succession in the large corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 538-547.
2.
AyresG. R. (1990). Rough family justice: Equity in family business succession planning. Family Business Review, 3, 3-22.
3.
*BachkaniwalaD.WrightM.RamM. (2001). Succession in South Asian family businesses in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 19, 15-27.
4.
BarberaF.BernhardF.NachtJ.McCannG. (2015). The relevance of a whole-person learning approach to family business education: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Learning & Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amle.2014.0233
5.
BarnettT.LongR. G.MarlerL. E. (2012). Vision and exchange in intra-family succession: Effects on procedural justice climate among nonfamily managers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1207-1225.
6.
*BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Pérez-GonzálezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.
7.
BiggartN. W.DelbridgeR. (2004). Systems of exchange. Academy of Management Review, 29, 28-49.
8.
*BirleyS. (1986). Succession in the family firm: The inheritor’s view. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3), 36-43.
9.
*BirleyS. (2002). Attitudes of owner-managers’ children towards family and business issues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 5-20.
10.
*BirleyS.NgD.GodfreyA. (1999). The family and the business. Long Range Planning, 32, 598-608.
11.
BlauP. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
*BocattoE.GispertC.RialpJ. (2010). Family-owned business succession: The influence of pre-performance in the nomination of family and nonfamily members: Evidence from Spanish firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48, 497-523.
13.
BrockhausR. H. (2004). Family business succession: Suggestions for future research. Family Business Review, 17, 165-177.
14.
BruceD.PicardD. (2006). Making succession a success: Perspectives from Canadian small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 306-309.
15.
*Brun de PontetS.WorschC.GagneM. (2007). An exploration of the generational differences in levels of control held among family businesses approaching succession. Family Business Review, 20, 337-354.
16.
Cabrera-SuárezK. (2005). Leadership transfer and the successor’s development in the family firm. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 71-96.
17.
Cabrera-SuárezK.De Saá-PérezP.García-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-46.
18.
CadieuxL.LorrainJ.HugronP. (2002). Succession in women-owned businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 17-30.
19.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
20.
ChandlerG. N.LyonD. W. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurial research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 101-113.
21.
*ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11, 19-34.
22.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP.YoderT. R. (2009). Guiding family business succession through the succession process: A step-by-step guide for CPA advisors. CPA Journal, 79, 48-51.
23.
*ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
24.
*ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (2003). Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89-108.
25.
*ChungC.-N.LuoX. R. (2013). Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 338-357.
26.
ChurchillN. C.HattenK. J. (1987). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 11, 51-64.
27.
ColemanJ. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309-1335.
28.
*CorbettaG.MontemerloD. (1999). Ownership, governance, and management issues in small and medium-size family businesses: A comparison of Italy and the United States. Family Business Review, 12, 361-374.
29.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
30.
DaspitJ. J.LongR. G. (2014). Mitigating moral hazard in entrepreneurial networks: Examining structural and relational social capital in East Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1343-1350.
31.
*DavisJ. A.TagiuriR. (1989). The influence of life stage on father-son work relationships in family companies. Family Business Review, 2, 47-74.
32.
DavisJ. H.AllenM. R.HayesH. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1093-1116.
33.
*DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1998). The influence of family on business succession process: A multigenerational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(3), 31-53.
34.
*DawsonA. (2011). Private equity investment decisions in family firms: The role of human resources and agency costs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 189-199.
35.
De MassisA.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183-199.
36.
De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2015). Learning resources for family business education: A review and directions for future developments. Academy of Management Learning & Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amle.2014.0246.
37.
DebickiB. J.MatherneC. F.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J. (2009). An overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Family Business Review, 22, 151-166.
38.
*DelmasM. A.GergaudO. (2014). Sustainable certification for future generations: The case of family business. Family Business Review, 27, 228-243.
39.
*DiwischD. S.VoithoferP.WeissC. R. (2009). Succession and firm growth: Results from a non-parametric matching approach. Small Business Economics, 32, 45-56.
40.
*DumasC. (1998). Women’s pathways to participation and leadership in the family-owned firm. Family Business Review, 11, 219-228.
41.
*DumasC.DupuisJ. P.RicherF.St.-CyrL. (1995). Factors that influence the next generation’s decision to take over the family farm. Family Business Review, 8, 99-120.
42.
DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143-162.
43.
*EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.FloydS. W.CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F. (2013). Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1177-1202.
44.
EkehP. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
*EklundJ.PalmbergJ.WibergD. (2013). Inherited corporate control and returns on investment. Small Business Economics, 41, 419-431.
46.
EmersonR. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
47.
*Fahed-SreihJ.DjoundourianS. (2006). Determinants of longevity and success in Lebanese family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 19, 225-234.
48.
*FiegenerM. K.BrownB. M.PrinceR. A.FileK. M. (1994). A comparison of successor development in family and nonfamily businesses. Family Business Review, 7, 313-329.
49.
*FiegenerM. K.BrownB. M.PrinceR. A.FileK. M. (1996). Passing on strategic vision: Favored modes of successor preparation by CEOs of family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 15-26.
50.
*FileK. M.PrinceR. A. (1996). Attributions for family business failure: The heir’s perspective. Family Business Review, 9, 171-184.
51.
GagnéM.SharmaP.De MassisA. (2014). The study of organizational behavior in family business. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 643-656.
52.
*GagnéM.WroschC.Brun de PontetS. (2011). Retiring from the family business: The role of goal adjustment capacities. Family Business Review, 24, 292-304.
53.
*GalloM. A. (1998). Ethics in personal behavior in family business. Family Business Review, 11, 325-336.
54.
*Garcia-AlvarezE.Lopez-SintasJ.GonzalvoP. (2002). Socialization patterns of successsors in first- to second-generation family businesses. Family Business Review, 15, 189-203.
55.
*GildingM. (2000). Family business and family change: Individual autonomy, democratization, and the new family business institutions. Family Business Review, 13, 239-250.
56.
*GoldbergS. D. (1996). Research note: Effective successors in family-owned businesses: Significant elements. Family Business Review, 9, 185-197.
57.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
58.
*Gómez-MejíaL. R.Nuñez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81-95.
59.
GouldnerA. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
60.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
61.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
62.
*HandlerW. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-51.
63.
*HandlerW. C. (1991). Key interpersonal relationships of next-generation family members in family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 21-32.
64.
*HandlerW. C. (1992). The succession experience of the next generation. Family Business Review, 5, 283-307.
65.
HandlerW. C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7, 133-157.
66.
*HarvestonP. D.DavisP. S.LydenJ. A. (1997). Succession planning in family business: The impact of owner gender. Family Business Review, 10, 373-396.
67.
*HatakI. R.RoesslD. (2015). Relational competence-based knowledge transfer within intrafamily succession: An experimental study. Family Business Review, 28, 10-25.
68.
HomansG. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
69.
*HuangT. (1999). Who shall follow? Factors affecting the adoption of succession plans in Taiwan. Long Range Planning, 32, 609-616.
70.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
71.
*KeatingN. C.LittleH. M. (1997). Choosing the successor in New Zealand family firms. Family Business Review, 10, 157-171.
72.
*KimH.DeVaneyS. A. (2003). The expectation of partial retirement among family business owners. Family Business Review, 16, 199-210.
73.
*KingS. (2003). Organizational performance and conceptual capability: The relationship between organizational performance and successors’ capability in a family-owned firm. Family Business Review, 16, 173-182.
74.
*KirbyD. A.LeeT. J. (1996). Research note: Succession management in family firms in the North East of England. Family Business Review, 9, 75-85.
75.
*KoroppC.GrichnikD.GygaxA. F. (2013). Succession financing in family firms. Small Business Economics, 41, 315-334.
76.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.
77.
*LansbergI.AstrachanJ. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7, 39-59.
78.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305-328.
79.
LeeK. S.LimG. H.LimW. S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28, 657-666.
80.
*Leon-GuerreroA. Y.McCannJ. E.HaleyJ. D. (1998). A study of practice utilization in family business. Family Business Review, 11, 107-120.
81.
Levi-StraussC. (1971). The elementary structures of kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
82.
*LinS.HuS. (2007). A family member or professional management: The choice of a CEO and its impact on performance. Corporate Governance, 15, 1348-1362.
83.
*LitzR. A.TurnerN. (2013). Sins of the father’s firm: Exploring responses to inherited ethical dilemmas in family business. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 297-315.
84.
LongR. G. (2011). Commentary: Social exchange in building, modeling, and managing family social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1129-1234.
85.
LongR. G.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Management succession in family business. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 249-268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
LongR. G.MathewsK. M. (2011). Ethics in the family firm: Cohesions through reciprocity and exchange. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 287-308.
87.
*MaloneS. C. (1989). Selected correlates of business continuity planning in the family business. Family Business Review, 2, 341-353.
88.
*MandelbaumL. (1994). Small business succession: The educational potential. Family Business Review, 7, 369-375.
89.
*MarshallJ.SorensonR.BrighamK.WielingE.ReifmanA.WamplerR. (2006). The paradox for the family firm CEO: Owner age relationship to succession-related processes and plans. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 348-368.
90.
MaussM. (2000). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London, England: Routledge.
91.
*MehrotraV.MorckR.ShimJ.WiwattanakantangY. (2011). Must love kill the family firm? Some exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1121-1148.
92.
*MehrotraV.MorckR.ShimJ.WiwattanakantangY. (2013). Adoptive expectations: Rising sons in Japanese family firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 840-854.
93.
*MillerD.SteierL.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
94.
*MollyV.LaverenE.DeloofM. (2010). Family business succession and its impact on financial structure and performance. Family Business Review, 23, 131-147.
95.
*MooresK.MulaJ. (2000). The salience of market, bureaucratic, and clan controls in the management of family firm transitions: Some tentative Australian evidence. Family Business Review, 13, 91-106.
96.
*MorrisM. H.WilliamsR. O.AllenJ. A.AvilaR. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 385-401.
97.
*MotwaniJ.LevenburgN.SchwarzT.BlanksonC. (2006). Succession planning in SMEs: An empirical analysis. International Small Business Journal, 24, 471-495.
98.
*NamY.-H.HerbertJ. I. (1999). Characteristics and key success factors in family business: The case of Korean immigrant businesses in metro-Atlanta. Family Business Review, 12, 341-352.
99.
*NeubauerH. (2003). The dynamics of succession in family business in Western European countries. Family Business Review, 16, 269-281.
100.
NordqvistM.WennbergK.BauM.HellerstedtK. (2013). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40, 1087-1122.
101.
PearsonA. W.MarlerL. E. (2010). A leadership perspective of reciprocal stewardship in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1117-1124.
102.
*Pérez-GonzálezF. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96, 1559-1588.
103.
*PerriconeP. J.EarleJ. R.TaplinI. M. (2001). Patterns of succession and continuity in family-owned businesses: Study of an ethnic community. Family Business Review, 14, 105-122.
104.
PollakR. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 581-608.
105.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications to modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
106.
*PozaE. J.AlfredT.MaheshwariA. (1997). Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms: A preliminary report. Family Business Review, 10, 135-155.
107.
*PozaE. J.HanlonS.KishidaR. (2004). Does the family business interaction factor represent a resource or a cost?Family Business Review, 17, 99-118.
108.
*RosenblattP. C. (1991). The interplay of family system and business system in family farms during economic recession. Family Business Review, 4, 45-57.
109.
*RoyerS.SimonsR.BoydB.RaffertyA. (2008). Promoting family: A contingency model of family business succession. Family Business Review, 21, 15-30.
110.
SalvatoC.CorbettaG. (2013). Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26, 235-255.
111.
*SalvatoC.MinichilliA.PiccarretaR. (2012). Faster route to the CEO suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency?Family Business Review, 25, 206-224.
112.
*SardeshmukhS. R.CorbettA. C. (2011). The duality of internal and external development of successors: Opportunity recognition in family firms. Family Business Review, 24, 111-125.
113.
*ScholesM. L.WrightM.WestheadP.BurrowsA.BruiningH. (2007). Information sharing, price negotiation and management buy-outs of private family-owned firms. Small Business Economics, 29, 329-349.
114.
*SchröderE.Schmitt-RodermundE.ArnaudN. (2011). Career choice intentions of adolescents with a family business background. Family Business Review, 24, 305-321.
115.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
116.
*SeymourK. C. (1993). Intergenerational relationships in the family firm: The effect on leadership succession. Family Business Review, 6, 263-281.
117.
*SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003a). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 667-687.
118.
*SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003b). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16, 1-16.
119.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.PabloA. L.ChuaJ. H. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 17-35.
120.
SharmaP.IrvingP. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 13-33.
121.
*SharmaP.RaoA. S. (2000). Successor attributes in Indian and Canadian family firms: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 13, 313-330.
122.
*ShepherdD. A.ZacharakisA. (2000). Structuring family business succession: An analysis of the future leader’s decision making. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(4), 25-39.
123.
SimmelG. (1972). The problem of sociology. In LevineD. N. (Ed.), Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms: Selected writings (pp. 23-35). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
124.
*SonfieldM. C.LussierR. N. (2004). First-, second-, and third-generation family firms: A comparison. Family Business Review, 17, 189-202.
125.
*StavrouE. T. (1999). Succession in family businesses: Exploring the effect of demographic factors on offspring intentions to join and take over the business. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 43-61.
126.
*StavrouE. T.KleanthousT.AnastasiouT. (2005). Leadership personality and firm culture during hereditary transitions in family firms: Model development and empirical investigation. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 187-206.
127.
*SteierL. (2001). Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14, 259-276.
128.
*TatogluE.KulaV.GlaisterK. W. (2008). Succession planning in family-owned businesses: Evidence from Turkey. International Small Business Journal, 26, 155-180.
129.
TurnerJ. (2003). The structure of sociological theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
130.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). American Fact Finder (U.S. Department of Commerce). Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/
131.
*VallejoM. C. (2008). Is the culture of family firms really different: A value-based model for its survival through generations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 261-279.
132.
*VenterE.BoshoffC.MaasG. (2005). The influence of successor-related factors on the succession process in small and medium-sized family businesses. Family Business Review, 18, 283-303.
133.
*VeraC. F.DeanM. A. (2005). An examination of the challenges daughters face in family business succession. Family Business Review, 18, 321-345.
134.
VerbekeA.KanoL. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1183-1205.
135.
*WelschJ. H. M. (1993). The impact of family ownership and involvement on the process of management succession. Family Business Review, 6, 31-54.
136.
*WestheadP. (2003). Succession decision-making outcomes reported by private family companies. International Small Business Journal, 21, 369-401.
137.
*WiklundJ.NordqvistM.HellerstedtK.BirdM. (2013). Internal versus external ownership transition in family firms: An embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1319-1340.
138.
WilliamsonO. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.
139.
*WrightM.ThompsonS.RobbieK. (1992). Venture capital and management-led, leveraged buy-outs: A European perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 47-71.
140.
*YooS. S.SchenkelM. T.KimJ. (2014). Examining the impact of inherited succession identity on family firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 246-265.
141.
YuA.LumpkinG. T.SorensonR. L.BrighamK. H. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25, 33-57.
142.
ZahraS. A.GeorgeG. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185-203.
143.
*ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23, 851-868.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
