Building on a longitudinal case study, this article describes the entrepreneurial behavior of a multinational family firm over generations. The study inductively raises the theoretic level to fill gaps in the literature about the family role in entrepreneurial behavior and addresses the singular count of the two- and three-circle models. The data analysis shows that entrepreneurial behavior emerges not only in response to business challenges but also and predominantly to family challenges. The cluster model is suggested as a necessary extension of the circle models, positing the family as the relevant level of analysis when considering entrepreneurial behavior and introducing the distinction between organic and portfolio, core and peripheral firms.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
2.
AndersonA. R.JackS. L.Drakopoulou-DoddS. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review, 18, 135-154.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Perez-GonzalezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.
5.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
6.
BirleyS.WestheadP. (1993). A comparison of new businesses established by novice and habitual founders in Great Britain. International Small Business Journal, 12, 38-60.
7.
BrannonD. L.WiklundJ.HaynieJ. M. (2013). The varying effects of family relationships in entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 107-132.
8.
BrockhausR. H. (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business research: Comparisons, critique, and lessons. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 25-38.
9.
CarlockR. S.WardJ. L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business. New York, NY: Palgrave.
10.
CarterS.RamM. (2003). Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21, 371-380.
11.
ChangE. P. C.MemiliE.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChuaJ. H. (2009). Family social capital, venture preparedness, and start-up decisions. Family Business Review, 22, 279-292.
12.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103-1113.
14.
CliffJ. E.JenningsP. D. (2005). Commentary on the multidimensional degree of family influence construct and the F-PEC measurement instrument. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 341-347.
15.
CoaseR. H.WangN. (2011). The industrial structure of production: A research agenda for innovation in an entrepreneurial economy. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(2), 1-11.
16.
CorbettaG.SalvatoC. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28, 355-362.
17.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173-208.
18.
CramtonC. D. (1993). Is rugged individualism the whole story? Public and private accounts of a firm’s founding. Family Business Review, 6, 233-261.
19.
CruzC.JustoR.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2011). Solving the paradox: A multifaced approach to corporate entrepreneurship in family firms. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
DanesS. M. (2011). Pillow talk leaks: Integrating couple interactions into entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(3), 1-5.
21.
DanesS. M. (2013). Entrepreneurship success: “The lone ranger” versus “It takes a village” approach?Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3(3), 277-285.
22.
DanesS. M.StaffordK.HaynesG. W.AmarapurkerS. S. (2009). Family capital of family firms: Bridging human, social, and financial capital. Family Business Review, 22, 199-215.
23.
DavidssonP.WiklundJ. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 81-100.
24.
DavisP.SternD. (1988). Adaptation, survival, and growyh of the family business: An integrated systems perspective. Family Business Review, 1, 69-85.
25.
DeyI. (2003). Qualitative data analysis. London, England: Routledge.
26.
Discua-CruzA.HoworthC.HamiltonE. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and mebmership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 17-46.
27.
DistelbergB. J.BlowA. (2011). Variations in family system boundaries. Family Business Review, 24, 28-46.
28.
DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143-162.
29.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
30.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
31.
ElderG. H. (Ed.). (1985). Life course dynamics: Trajectoires and transitions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
GephartR. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454-462.
33.
GersickK. E.DavisJ.McCollomHampton, M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Lifecycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De-CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
35.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK. T.Nunez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
36.
GreensteinT. N.DavisS. N. (2013). Methods of family research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
HabbershonT. G.NordqvistM.ZellwegerT. M. (2010). Transgenerational entrepreneurship. In NordqvistM.ZellwegerT. M. (Eds.), Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring growth and performance of family firms across generations (pp. 1-38). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
38.
HabbershonT. G.PistruiJ. (2002). Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in persuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15, 223-237.
39.
HanielF. (2008). A haniel chronology 1756-2008. Duisburg, Germany.
40.
HarveyM.EvansR. E. (1994). Family business and multiple levels of conflict. Family Business Review, 7, 331-348.
41.
HeckR. K. Z. (Ed.). (1998). The entrepreneurial family. Needham, MA: Family Business Resources.
42.
HeckR. K. Z.TrentE. S. (1999). The prevalence of family business from a household sample. Family Business Review, 12, 209-224.
43.
IacobucciD.RosaP. (2010). The growth of business groups by habitual entrepreneurs: The role of entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 351-377.
44.
IravaW.MooresK. (2010). Resources supporting entrepreneurial orientation in multigenerational family firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2(3/4), 222-245.
45.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkreuzR. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 87-108.
46.
KabanoffB.WalderseeR.CohenM. (1995). Espousedvalues and organizational change themes. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1075-1104.
47.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 809-830.
48.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A.BarnettT.PearsonA. (2008). An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review, 21, 1-14.
49.
KotlerP.KellerK. L. (2009). Marketing management (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.
LabakiR.Michael-TsabariN.ZacharyR. K. (2013). Exploring the emotional nexus in cogent family business archetypes. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3, 301-330.
51.
LansbergI. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 39-46.
52.
LitzR. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definition clarity. Family Business Review, 8, 71-81.
53.
LitzR. A.PearsonA. W.LitchfieldS. (2012). Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review, 25, 16-32.
54.
MäkimattilaM.RautiainenM.PihkalaT. (2013, July). Systemic innovation in SME context: A family business portfolio case. Paper presented at the IFERA Conference, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
55.
MartinezM. A.YangT.AldrichH. E. (2011). Entrepreneurship as an evolutionary process: Research progress and challenges. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1, 1-26.
56.
MillerD.SteierL. P.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
57.
MoenP. (1998). A life course approach to the entrepreneurial family. In HeckR. K. Z. (Ed.), The entrepreneurial family (pp. 16-29). Needham, MA: Family Business Resources.
58.
MooresK. (2009). Paradigms and theory building in the domain of business families. Family Business Review, 22, 167-180.
59.
MorrisM. W.PengK. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
60.
NordqvistM.MelinL. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 211-239.
61.
NordqvistM.ZellwegerT. M. (2010). A qualitative research approach to the study of transgenerational entrepreneurship. In NordqvistM.ZellwegerT. M. (Eds.), Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring growth and performance in family firms across generations (pp. 39-57). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
62.
PistruiD.MurphyP. J.Deprez-SimsA-S. (2010). The transgenerational family effect on new venture growth strategy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 12, 3-16.
63.
PlateM.SchiedeC.von-SchlippeA. (2010). Portfolio entrepreneurship in the context of family owned businesses. In NordqvistM.ZellwegerT. M. (Eds.), Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring growth and performance in family firms across generations (pp. 96-122). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
64.
PloyhartR. E.VandenbergR. I. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94-120.
65.
PrattM. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 481-509.
66.
PrattM. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 856-862.
67.
RogoffE. G.HeckR. K. Z. (2003). Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship [Editorial]. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 559-566.
68.
RosaP.HoworthC.CruzA. D. (2014). Habitual and portfolio entrepreneurship and the family in business. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 364-382). London, England: Sage.
69.
RosenblattP. C.de MikL.AndersonR. M.JohnsonP. A. (1985). The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challanges entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70.
SchjoedtL.MonsenE.PearsonA.BarnettT.ChrismanJ. J. (2013). New venture and family business teams: Understanding team formation, composition, behaviors, and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1-15.
71.
SchneiderB. R. (2010). Business groups and the state: The politics of expension, restructuring, and collapse. In ColpanA. M.HikinoT.LincolnJ. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business groups (pp. 650-669). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
72.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
73.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.ChiricoF. (2013). Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 69-85.
74.
ScottM.RosaP. (1996). Has firm level analysis reached its limits? Time for a rethink. International Business Journal, 14(4), 81-89.
75.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1-35.
76.
ShepherdD. A.SutcliffeK. M. (2011). Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36, 361-380.
77.
ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.BrighamK. H.LumpkinG. T.BrobergJ. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 22, 9-24.
78.
SiegerP.ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.ClintonE. (2011). Portfolio entrepreneurship in family firms: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 327-351.
79.
SteierL. (2007). New venture creation and organization: A familial sub-narrative. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1099-1107.
80.
SundaramurthyC.KreinerG. E. (2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 415-436.
81.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
82.
WeigelD. J.Ballard-ReishD. S. (1997). Merging family and firm: An integrated systems approach to process and change. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18, 7-31.
83.
WestheadP.WrightM. (1998). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different?Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 173-204.
84.
WhitesideM. F.BrownF. H. (1991). Drawbacks of a dual systems approach to family firms: Can we expand our thinking?Family Business Review, 4, 383-395.
85.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousasnd Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
ZacharyR. K. (2011). The importance of the family system in family business. Journal of Family Business Management, 1, 26-36.
87.
ZacharyR. K.DanesS. M.StaffordK. (2013). Extensions of the sustainable family business theory (SFBT): Operationalization and application. In SmyrniosK. X.PoutziourisP. Z.GoelS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on family business (2nd ed., pp. 507-553). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
88.
ZahraS. A.CovinJ. G. (1995). Contextual Influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43-58.
89.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25, 136-155.
90.
ZodyZ.SprenkleD.MacDermidS.SchrankH. (2006). Boundaries and the functioning of family and business systems. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 185-206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
