We engaged in a multicase comparative study exploring how family farm businesses continue when economic returns are minimal. We analyzed strategic approaches used by 20 family dairy farms operating in the United Kingdom and identified four different strategic behaviors chosen by the family farm businesses—diversifying the business, maximizing debt, sacrificing family needs, and compromising. Each strategy allows the firm to survive, but has consequences for the family, the business, or both. Our study contributes to the socioemotional wealth literature by showing how emotional attachment to the business can influence firm decision making.
AlvessonM. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organisational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 13-33.
3.
AndersonA. R.JackS. J. (2000, February). The production of prestige: An entrepreneurial Viagra, entrepreneurship and innovation. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 45-57.
4.
AustinE. J.DearyI. J.GibsonG. J.McGreggorM. J.DentJ. B. (1996). Attitudes and values of Scottish farmers: “Yeoman” and “Entrepreneur” as factors, not distinct types. Rural Sociology, 61, 464-474.
5.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future researchFamily Business Review, 25, 258-279.
6.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejiaL. R.LarrazaM. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and organizational response to institutional pressures: Do family controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 82-113.
7.
BrownR. B.CoverleyR. (1999). Succession planning in family business: A study from East Anglia, U.K. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(1), 93-97.
8.
BurtonR. J. F. (1998). The role of farmer self-identity in agricultural decision making in the Marston Vale Community Forest (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). De Montfort University, Leicester, England.
9.
CarlockR. S.WardJ. L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business: Parallel planning to unify the family and business. Houndmills, England: Palgrave.
10.
CassonM. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 17(1), 10-23.
11.
ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChanK. C.LianoK. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
12.
ColliA. (2012). Contextualizing performances of family firms: The perspective of business history. Family Business Review, 25, 243-257.
13.
CruzC.JustoR.De CastroJ. O. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs performance? Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 62-76.
14.
DanesS. M.StaffordK.HaynesG.AmarapurkarS. S. (2009). Family capital of family firms: Bridging human, social and financial capital, Family Business Review, 22, 199-215.
15.
Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. (2012). Agriculture in the United Kingdom (National Statistics Report). London, England: Author.
16.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London, England: Sage.
17.
DonnelleyR. G. (1964). The family business. Harvard Business Review, 42, 93-105.
18.
DunnB. (1995). Success themes in Scottish family enterprises: Philosophies and practices through generations. Family Business Review, 3, 225-244.
19.
DyerW. G. (1994). Potential contributions of organizational behavior to the study of family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 7, 109-131.
20.
Farmers Weekly. (2003, May16). Diversification activities in UK farming. Retrieved from www.farmersweekly.co.uk
21.
GassonR.ErringtonA. (1993). The family farm business. Oxon, England: CAB International.
22.
GloverJ. L. (2009). Why do dairy farmers continue to farm? Can Bourideu’s theory aid our understanding (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Loughborough University, Leicestershire, England.
23.
Gómez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK.Nuñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
24.
Gómez-MejiaL. R.MakriM.Larraza-KintanaM. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 223-252.
25.
GrayJ. (1998). Family farms in the Scottish borders: A practical definition by hill sheep farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 14, 341-356.
26.
GubittaP.GianecchiniM. (2002). Governance and flexibility in family-owned SMEs. Family Business Review, 15, 277-298.
27.
HandlerW. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next generation family members. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-51.
28.
HoworthC.RoseM.HamiltonE.WestheadP. (2010). Family firm diversity and development: An introduction. International Small Business Journal, 28, 437-451.
29.
JervellA. M. (1999). Changing patterns of family farming and pluriactivity. Sociologica Ruralis, 39, 100-116.
30.
JohnsonD.BoothA. (1990). Rural economic decline and marital quality: A panel study of farm marriages. Family Relations, 39, 159-165.
KeatingN. C.MunroB. (1989). Transferring the family farm: Process and implications. Family Relations, 38, 215-219.
33.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59-71.
34.
KimhiA. (1994). Optimal timing of farm transferral from parent to child. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 228-236.
35.
KimhiA.LopezR. (1999). A note on farmers’ retirement and succession considerations: Evidence from a household survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 154-162.
36.
LabandD. N.LentzB. F. (1983). Occupational inheritance in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 311-314.
37.
LobleyM.ErringtonA.McGeorgeA.MillardN.PotterC. (2002). Implications of changes in the structure of agricultural businesses (Research Report Prepared for DEFRA). Plymouth, England: University of Plymouth.
38.
McKeeD.MaddenT. M.KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2014). Conflicts in family firms: The good and the bad. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 514-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005a). Management Insights from great and struggling family businesses. Long Range Planning, 38, 517-530.
40.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005b). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
NewbyH.RoseD.SaundersP.BellC. (1981). Farming for survival: The smaller farmer in the contemporary rural class structure. In BechoferF.ElliotB. (Eds.), The petit bourgeoisie (pp. 38-70). London, England: MacMillan.
42.
OndersteijnC. J. M.GiesenG. W. J.HuirneR. B. M. (2003). Identification of farmer characteristics and farm strategies explaining changes in environmental management and environmental and economic performance of dairy farms. Agricultural Systems, 78, 31-55.
43.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London, England: Sage.
44.
PoutziourisP.SteierL.SmyrniosK. X. (2004). A commentary on family business entrepreneurial developments. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 10(1/2), 7-11.
45.
PotterC.LobleyM. (1992). Ageing and succession on family farms: The impact on decision-making and land use. Sociologia Ruralis, 32, 317-334.
46.
SchulzeW. G.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-203.
47.
SimonH. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York, NY: Wiley.
48.
SmithN.DaviesA.HirschD. (2010). A minimum income standard for rural households. Leicestershire, England: Loughborough University.
49.
StokesD.BlackburnR. (2002). Learning the hard way: The lessons of owner-managers who have closed their businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(1), 17-27.
50.
StockmansA.LybaertN.VoordeckersW. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and earnings management in private family firms. Family Business Review, 23, 280-294.
51.
Van der PloegJ. D. (2000). Revitalising agriculture: Farming economically as starting ground for rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 497-511.
52.
VoronovM.VinceR. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37, 58-81.
53.
WeigelD. J.Ballard-ReischD. S. (1997). Merging family and firm: An integrated systems approach to process and change. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18, 7-31.
54.
WeigelD. J.WeigelR. R. (1990). Family satisfaction in Two-generational farm families: The role of stress and resources. Family Relations, 39, 449-455.
55.
WillokJ.DearyI. J.Edwards-JonesG.GibsonG. J.McGregorM. J.SuntherlandA.. . . GrieveR. (1999). The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision-making: Business and environmentally orientated behavior in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 286-303.
56.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
57.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25, 136-155.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
