Performances have only recently been addressed in business history research, partly because of problems concerning data quality and availability. As a consequence, performance measurement in family firms has been a neglected area in historical studies. Family business historians are thus increasingly interested in this topic. However, the longitudinal perspective adopted requires a problematical approach to the concept of performance. This article provides a critical assessment of the relationship between family firms and performance measurement from the perspective of business history and, at the same time, suggests the potential contribution of historical analysis to theory building in this field.
AmatoriF. (1989). La Rinascente. Proprietà e direzione, 1917-1969 [La Rinascente. Ownership and management 1917-1969]. Milan, Italy: Angeli.
2.
AmatoriF.ColliA. (2000). Impresa e industria in Italia dall’Unità ad oggi [Business Enterprise and Industry in Italy from the Unification to today]. Venezia, Italy: Marsilio.
3.
BascoR.RodriguezM. J. P. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically: Evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22, 82-95.
4.
BerghoffH. (2006). The End of Family Business? The Mittelstand and German Capitalism in Transition. Business History Review, 80, 263-295.
5.
BoyceG. (2010). Language and culture in a Liverpool merchant family firm, 1870-1950. Business History Review, 84(1), 1-26.
6.
BuckleyP. (2009). Business history and international business. Business History, 51, 307-333.
7.
CarrollA. B.SabanaK. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
8.
CassonM. (1999). The economics of the family firms. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47, 10-23.
9.
ChandlerA. D. (1990). Scale and scope. The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
CraigJ. B.DibrellC.DavisP. S. (2008). Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 351-371.
11.
ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChanK. C.LianoK. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
12.
DanesS. M.StaffordK.HaynesG.AmarapurkarS. S. (2009). Family capital of family firms: Bridging human, social and financial capital. Family Business Review, 222, 199-215.
13.
FaveroC. A.GiglioS. W.HonoratiM.PanunziF. (2006). The performance of Italian family firms (Discussion Paper 5786). London, England: Centre of Economic Policy Research.
14.
FearJ. (1995). AugustThyssen and German Steel. In McCrawT. (Ed.), Creating modern capitalism (pp. 183-227), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
FernandezP.PuigN. (2007). Bonsais in a wild forest? A historical interpretation of the longevity of large Spanish family firms. Revista de Historia Economica, 25, 459-497.
16.
Fernandez-MoyaM. (2010). A family-owned publishing multinational: The Salvat company (1869-1988). Business History, 52, 453-470.
17.
GinalskiS. (2010). Business elites and family networks: The case of the Swiss metallurgy industry during the 20th century. Paper presented at the European Business History Association Conference, Glasgow, England.
18.
HudsonP. (1994). Financing firms, 1700-1850. In KirbyM.RoseM. B. (Eds.), Business enterprise in modern Britain: From the eighteenth to the twentieth century (pp. 88-112). London, England: Routledge.
19.
JamesH. (2006). Family capitalism. Wendels, Haniels, Falcks and the continental European model. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
20.
JohnsG. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408.
21.
JonesG.KhannaT. (2006). Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 453-468.
22.
JonesG.ZeitlinJ. (2008). Introduction. In JonesG.ZeitlinJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business history (pp. 1-8). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23.
LandesD. (2006). Dynasties: Fortunes and misfortunes of the World’s great family businesses. New York, NY: Viking Press.
24.
LitzR. A.PearsonA. W.LitchfieldS. (2012). Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review, 25, 16-32.
25.
McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C.ZacharyM. A.Tyge PayneG. (2012). Assessing espoused goals in private family firms using content analysis. Family Business Review, 25, 298-317.
26.
NiehmL.SwinneyJ.MillerN. J. (2008). Community social responsibility and its consequences for family business performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 331-350.
27.
O’SullivanM.GrahamM. (2010). Moving forward by looking backward: Business history and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 775-790.
28.
SalvatoC.MooresK. (2010). Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23, 193-215.
29.
SalvatoC.MelinL. (2008). Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review, 21, 259-276.
30.
SorensonR. L.GoodpasterK. E.HedbergP. R.YuA. (2009). The family point of view, family social capital and firm performance: An exploratory test. Family Business Review, 22, 239-253.
31.
TesiF. (2010). From paternalism to the Michelin performance and responsibility charter: Aspects of the non-profit activities of a family firm. Paper presented at the European Business History Association Conference, Glasgow, England.
32.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
WoodD. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
34.
WoodD. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 50-84.
35.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203-216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
