Scholars have recently paid growing attention to the transfer of family legacies across generations, but existing work has been mainly focused on an inward-oriented, intra-family, perspective. In this article, we seek to understand how family firms engage in rhetorical history to transfer their social family legacy to external stakeholders, what we call “outward-oriented social legacy.” By carrying out a 12-months field study in three Italian family business foundations, our findings unveil three distinctive narrative practices—founder foreshadowing, emplacing the legacy within the broader community, and weaving family history with macro—history—that contribute to transferring outward-oriented social legacies.
ArregleJ.-L.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95.
2.
BarberaF.StammI.DeWittR. L. (2018). The development of an entrepreneurial legacy: Exploring the role of anticipated futures in transgenerational entrepreneurship. Family Business Review, 31(3), 352–378.
3.
BelenzonS.ChatterjiA. K.DaleyB. (2017). Eponymous entrepreneurs. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1638–1655.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
6.
BoersB.LjungkvistT. (2019). A founder’s heritage: The development of organizational identity. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 73–95.
7.
BoothC.ClarkP.DelahayeA.ProcterS.RowlinsonM. (2007). Accounting for the dark side of corporate history: Organizational culture perspectives and the Bertelsmann case. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(6), 625–644.
8.
BothelloJ.GauthierA.PacheA.-C. (2020). Families, firms and philanthropy: Shareholder foundation responses to competing goals. In RozaL.MeijsL.von SchnurbeinG. (Eds.), Handbook on corporate foundations (pp. 63–82). Springer.
9.
BrunerJ. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.
10.
BurtonN.VuM. C.CruzA. D. (2022). Our social legacy will go on: Understanding outcomes of family SME succession through engaged Buddhism. Journal of Business Research, 143, 105–118.
11.
CalabròA. (2022). L’avvenire della memoria. Raccontare l’impresa per stimolare l’innovazione. [The future of memory. Narrating the enterprise to stimulate innovation]. EGEA.
12.
CennamoC.BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153–1173.
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.
14.
CoraiolaD. M.FosterW. M.SuddabyR. (2015). Varieties of history in organization studies. In McLarenP. G.MillsA. J.WeatherbeeT. G. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to management & organizational history (pp. 206–221). Routledge.
15.
CrawfordB.CoraiolaD. M.DacinM. T. (2022). Painful memories as mnemonic resources: Grand Canyon Dories and the protection of place. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 51–79.
16.
DalpiazE.Di StefanoG. (2018). A universe of stories: Mobilizing narrative practices during transformative change. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 664–696.
17.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12(4), 311–323.
18.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337–360.
19.
De GrootM. B. T.MihalacheO. R.ElfringT. (2022). Toward a theory of family social capital in wealthy transgenerational enterprise families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(1), 159–192.
20.
De MassisA.AudretschD. B.UhlanerL. M.KammerlanderN. H. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.
21.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.KotlarJ.Messeni PetruzzelliA. (2016). Innovation through Tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116.
22.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ManelliL. (2021). Family firms, family boundary organizations and the family-related organizational ecosystem. Family Business Review, 34(4), 250–264.
23.
Diaz-MorianaV.ClintonE.KammerlanderN. H.LumpkinG. T.CraigJ. B. (2020). Innovation motives in family firms: A transgenerational view. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 256–287.
24.
ErdoganI.RondiE.De MassisA. (2020). Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: A family imprinting perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 20–54.
25.
FeliuN.BoteroI. C. (2016). Philanthropy in family enterprises: A review of literature. Family Business Review, 29(1), 121–141.
26.
FosterW. M.CoraiolaD. M.SuddabyR.KroezenJ. J.ChandlerD. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: A theoretical framework. Business History, 59(8), 1176–1200.
27.
FosterW. M.SuddabyR.MinkusA.WiebeE. (2011). History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons. Management & Organizational History, 6(1), 101–120.
28.
FosterW. M.WiebeE.CoraiolaD. M.BastienF.SuddabyR. (2020). Memory work: Corporate archivists and long-term remembering in organizations. In ReineckeJ.SuddabyR.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Time, temporality, and history in process organization studies (pp. 240–258). Oxford University Press.
29.
GeB.De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2022). Mining the past: History scripting strategies and competitive advantage in a family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(1), 223–251.
30.
GehringerT. (2021). Corporate Foundations as hybrid organizations: A systematic review of the literature. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 257–275.
31.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
32.
HammondN. L.PearsonA. W.HoltD. T. (2016). The quagmire of legacy in family firms: Definition and implications of family and family firm legacy orientations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 1209–1231.
33.
HarrisL. C.OgbonnaE. (1999). The strategic legacy of company founders. Long Range Planning, 32(3), 333–343.
34.
HatchM. J.SchultzM. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(4), 657–697.
35.
HjorthD.DawsonA. (2016). The burden of history in the family business organization. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1089–1111.
36.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.NelsonA.VoughH.ZilberT. B. (2021). From the editors: Achieving fit and avoiding misfit in qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 64(5), 1313–1323.
37.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.RauS. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49.
38.
KammerlanderN. H.DessìC.BirdM.FlorisM.MurruA. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332–354.
39.
LasewiczP. C. (2015). Forget the past? Or history matters? Selected academic perspectives on the strategic value of organizational pasts. American Archivist, 78(1), 59–83.
40.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2011). Commentary: Family firms and the advantage of multitemporality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1171–1177.
41.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
42.
LubinskiC. (2018). From “history as told” to “history as experienced”: Contextualizing the uses of the past. Organization Studies, 39(12), 1785–1809.
43.
MagrelliV.RondiE.De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2022). Generational brokerage: An intersubjective perspective on managing temporal orientations in family firm succession. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 164–199.
44.
MarquisC.TilcsikA. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 193–243.
45.
MenaS.RintamäkiJ. (2020). Managing the past responsibly: A collective memory perspective on responsibility, sustainability and ethics. In LaaschO.SuddabyR.GustavsonP. B.FreemanR. E.JamaliD. (Eds.), Research handbook of responsible management (pp. 470–483). Edward Elgar.
46.
MicelottaE. R.GlaserV. L.DorianG. (2019). Qualitative research in family business: Methodological insights to leverage inspiration, avoid data asphyxiation, and develop robust theory. In De MassisA.KammerlanderN. H. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for family business (pp. 25–47). Edward Elgar.
47.
MicelottaE. R.RaynardM. (2011). Concealing or revealing the family? Corporate brand identity strategies in family firms. Family Business Review, 24(3), 197–216.
48.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
49.
MillerD.Le-Breton MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press.
50.
NissleyN.CaseyA. (2002). The politics of the exhibition: Viewing corporate museums through the paradigmatic lens of organizational memory. British Journal of Management, 13(S2), S35–S45.
51.
PedriniM.MinciulloM. (2011). Italian corporate foundations and the challenges of multiple stakeholder interests. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(2), 173–194.
52.
PoppA.FellmanS. (2020). Power, archives and the making of rhetorical organizational histories: A stakeholder perspective. Organization Studies, 41(11), 1531–1549.
53.
RabakiR.BernhardF.CailluetL. (2019). The strategic use of historical narratives in the family business. In MemiliE.DibrellC. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of heterogeneity among family firms (pp. 531–553). Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
RandolphR. V.AlexanderB. N.MadisonK.BarberaF. (2022). When family business meets social enterprise: An integrative review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 35(3), 219–245.
55.
RavasiD.RindovaV.StiglianiI. (2019). The stuff of legend: History, memory and the temporality of organizational identity construction. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1523–1555.
56.
ReayT.JaskiewiczP.HiningsC. R. (2015). How family, business, and community logics shape family firm behavior and “rules of the game” in an organizational field. Family Business Review, 28(4), 292–311.
57.
RenzD.RozaL.SimmonsF.-J. (2020). Challenges in corporate foundation governance. In Lonneke RozaBethmannS.MejisL.von SchnurbeinG. (Eds.), Handbook on corporate foundations (pp. 17–37). Springer.
58.
SalvatoC.ChiricoF.SharmaP. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3–4), 321–348.
59.
SasakiI.RavasiD.MicelottaE. R. (2019). Family firms as institutions: Cultural reproduction and status maintenance among multi-centenary shinise in Kyoto. Organization Studies, 40(6), 793–831.
60.
SchillaciC. E.RomanoM.NicotraM. (2013). Family business foundations: Theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-2-22
61.
Schrempf-StirlingJ.PalazzoG.PhillipsR. A. (2016). Historic corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 700–719.
62.
SharmaP.SalvatoC.ReayT. (2014). Temporal dimensions of family enterprise research. Family Business Review, 27(1), 10–19.
63.
SinhaP. N.JaskiewiczP.GibbJ.CombsJ. G. (2020). Managing history: How New Zealand’s Gallagher Group used rhetorical narratives to reprioritize and modify imprinted strategic guideposts. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 557–589.
64.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
65.
SteierL. P.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2015). Governance challenges in family businesses and business families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1265–1280.
66.
SuddabyR. (2016). Toward a historical consciousness: Following the historic turn in management thought. M@n@gement, 19(1), 46–60.
67.
SuddabyR.CoraiolaD. M.HarveyC.FosterW. M. (2020). History and the micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 530–556.
68.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M. (2017). History and organizational change. Journal of Management, 43(1), 19–38.
69.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M.Quinn TrankC. (2010). Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. In BaumJ. A. C.LampelJ. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management: The globalization of strategy research (Vol. 27, pp. 147–173). Emerald Group.
70.
SuddabyR.IsraelsenT.BastienF.SaylorsR.CoraiolaD. (2023). Rhetorical history as institutional work. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 242–278.
71.
SuddabyR.IsraelsenT. L.MitchellJ. R.LimD. S. K. (2021). Entrepreneurial visions as rhetorical history: A diegetic narrative model of stakeholder enrollment. Academy of Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0010
72.
SuddabyR.JaskiewiczP. (2020). Managing traditions: A critical capability for family business success. Family Business Review, 33(3), 234–243.
73.
SuddabyR.SchultzM.IsraelsenT. L. (2020). Autobiographical memory and organizational identity: The role of temporal fluidity. In BrownA. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of identities in organizations (pp. 375–390). Oxford University Press.
74.
WadhwaniR. D.SuddabyR.MordhorstM.PoppA. (2018). History as organizing: Uses of the past in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39(12), 1663–1683.
75.
WrightA. L.IrvingG.ZafarA.ReayT. (2022). The role of space and place in organizational and institutional change: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12868
76.
YbemaS. (2014). The invention of transitions: History as a symbolic site for discursive struggles over organizational change. Organization, 21(4), 495–513.
77.
ZaghiA. (2021). La memoria e il futuro. Alle radici dell’innovazione nell’industria del Terzo Millennio [The memory and the future. At the roots of innovation in the industry of the third millennium]. Luiss University Press.
78.
ZerubavelE. (2003). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. The University of Chicago Press.
79.
ZundelM.HoltR.PoppA. (2016). Using history in the creation of organizational identity. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 211–235.
