This study draws on agency theory and the resource-based view to hypothesize that family and nonfamily businesses differ in the capital that they deploy and the way that they deploy it. It, and test this hypothesis in a large U.K.-based sample of 319 family business and 258 nonfamily business owner/managers. The analysis revealed that adverse selection, opportunism, and niche marginalization are more prevalent among family business owner/managers. Yet, their businesses are similar to those of their nonfamily business peers in performance outcomes such as size and growth, which suggests that weaknesses in human and financial capital choice are offset by strengths in the social capital of family firms.
Aldrich, H.E., & Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
2.
Anderson, R.C., & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
3.
Arregle, J., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies , 44, 73-95.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage . Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
6.
Blanco-Mazagatos, V., de Quevedo-Puente, E., & Castrillo, L.A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business. Family Business Review, 20, 199-213.
7.
Cabrera-Suarez, K., Saa-Perez, P.D., & Almeida, D.G. (2001). The succession process from a resource and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-47.
8.
Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 29, 249-265.
9.
Castillo, J., & Wakefield, M.W. (2007). An exploration of firm performance factors in family businesses: Do families value only the "bottom line"? Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 37-51.
10.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Sharma, P. (2003). Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm. Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.usasbe.org/knowledge/whitepapers/chrisman2003.pdf
11.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-575.
12.
Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Steier, L.P. (2003). Extending the theoretical horizons of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 331-338.
13.
Colbert, B.A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29, 341-358.
14.
Craig, J.B., Dibrell, C., & Davis, P.S. (2008). Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 351-371.
15.
Cromie, S., Stephenson, B., & Monteith, D. (1995). The management of family firms: An empirical investigation . International Small Business Journal, 13(4), 11-34.
16.
Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., & Teik-Cheok Loy, J. (2007). Family business performance: The effects of gender and management. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1058-1069.
17.
Davis, J.H., Schoorman, D.F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Towards a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
18.
Denison, D., Lief, C., & Ward, J. (2004). Culture in family-owned enterprises: Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Family Business Review, 17, 61-70.
19.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49-64.
20.
Dyer, W.G., Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transactions. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
21.
Dyer, W.G., Jr. (2006). Examining the "family effect" on firm performance . Family Business Review, 19, 253-273.
22.
Eddleston, K.A., & Kellermanns, F.W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 545-565.
23.
Eddleston, K.A., Kellermanns, F.W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance . Journal of Management Studies, 46, 26-50.
24.
Francis, A. (1980). Families, firms and finance capital: The development of UK industrial firms with particular reference to their ownership and control . Sociology, 14, 1-27.
25.
Gallo, M.A., Tapies, J., & Cappuyns, K. (2004). Comparison of family and nonfamily business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, 17, 303-318.
26.
Greenwood, R. (2003). Commentary on: "Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms." Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 491-494.
27.
Habbershon, T.G., & Williams, M.L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25.
28.
Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M.L., & MacMillan, I.C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing , 18, 451-465.
29.
Harris, R.D., Reid, R.S., & McAdam, R. (2004). Consultation and communication in family businesses in Great Britain. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1424-1444.
30.
Hatch, N.W., & Dyer, J.H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1155-1178.
31.
Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19, 135-145.
32.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
33.
Kang, D. (2000). Family ownership and performance in public corporations: A study of the U.S. Fortune 500, 1982-1994 (Working Paper No. 00-0051). Boston: Harvard Business School.
34.
Karra, N., Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861-877.
35.
Kotey, B. (2005). Are performance differences between family and nonfamily SMEs uniform across all firm sizes? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 11, 394-421.
36.
Lee, J. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19, 103-115.
37.
Levie, J. (2007). Immigration, in-migration, ethnicity and entrepreneurship in the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 28,143-169.
38.
Levie, J., Hart, M., Harding, R., &Anyadyke-Danes, M. (2007, November). How does ethnic minority entrepreneurship differ? Evidence from GEM. Paper presented at the Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference , Glasgow, UK.
39.
Lubatkin, M.H., Ling, Y., & Schulze, W.S. (2007). An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies , 44, 955-971.
40.
Martin, W.L., Vaughn, M.J., & Lumpkin, G.T. (2005, June). Towards a clarification of "family orientation": An integration of entrepreneurship and family business theories. Paper presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference , Babson Park, MA.
41.
McConaughy, D.L., Matthews, C.H., & Fialko, A.S. (2001). Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk, and value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 31-49.
42.
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 51-78.
43.
Murphy, D.L. (2005). Understanding the complexities of private family firms: An empirical investigation. Family Business Review , 28, 123-133.
44.
Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20, 33-58.
45.
Nordqvist, M. (2005). Familiness in top management teams: Commentary on Ensley and Pearson's "An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 29, 285-291.
46.
Pearson, A.W., Carr, J.C., & Shaw, J.C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949-969.
47.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.
48.
Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
49.
Poza, E.J., Hanlon, S., & Kishida, R. (2004). Does the family business interaction factor represent a resource or a cost? Family Business Review, 17, 99-118.
50.
Reid, R.S., & Adams, J.S. (2001). Human resource management-A survey of practices within family and non-family firms. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25, 310-320.
51.
Reid, R., Dunn, B., Cromie, S., & Adams, J. (1999). Family orientation in family firms: A model and some empirical evidence. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 6, 55-67.
52.
Reynolds, P.P., Bosma, N., & Autio, E. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data collection design and implementation, 1998-2003. Small Business Economics , 24, 205-231.
53.
Romano, C. A., Tanewski, G. A., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2001). Capital structure decision making: A model for family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 285-310.
54.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., & Dino, R.N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-491.
55.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., & Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
56.
Sharma, P. (2008) Commentary: Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 32, 971-977.
57.
Sirmon, D.G., & Hitt, M.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
58.
Smith, M. (2006). An empirical comparison of the managerial development of family and non-family SMEs from Australia's manufacturing sector. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 14, 125-141.
59.
Stafford, K., Duncan, K.A., Dane, S., & Winter, M. (1999). A research model of sustainable family businesses . Family Business Review, 12, 197-208.
60.
Tokarczyk, J., Hansen, E.Green, M., & Down, J. (2007). A resource-based view and market orientation theory examination of the role of familiness in family business success. Family Business Review, 20, 17-31.
61.
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, management and control affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.
62.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). Resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
63.
Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 31-56.
64.
Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and management isues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19, 301-316.
65.
Wu, Z., Chua, J.H., & Chrisman, J.J. (2007). Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 875-895.
66.
Zahra, S.A. (2003). Ownership involvement and international expansion: An empirical test of the stewardship theory among family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 495-512.
67.
Zahra, S., & Sharma, P. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection . Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
